THE LEGAL NATURE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Nadezhda V. Aleksandrova, N. V. Ivanov
{"title":"THE LEGAL NATURE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION","authors":"Nadezhda V. Aleksandrova, N. V. Ivanov","doi":"10.47026/2499-9636-2022-2-52-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the article is due to the fact that in civil proceedings, electronic evidence can be considered the most popular method of obtaining evidence to date. However, in law enforcement practice, there are many gaps in the formation of the institution of electronic evidence. The advantage of electronic evidence in civil proceedings is quite obvious, which makes it necessary to take a different look at this type of evidence. The courts, certainly, strive to respect the interests of the parties when considering cases on the basis of competition and equality of the parties, but the study of judicial practice shows that the presence of electronic evidence stands out against the other evidence and acquires a special status that requires research, detailed legislative development and procedural regulation. At the same time, it should be noted that there has been insufficient research on this topic in the scientific and procedural doctrine; in this connection, the opinions of researchers and their assessment are given. The purpose of the article is to determine the legal nature of electronic evidence in civil proceedings, especially in the context of the development of digitalization and electronic information technologies. The procedural legal, formal legal, logical, dialectical and other methods of scientific research make up the methodological basis. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the legal nature of electronic evidence is closely related to modern technical means, and the position on the need to consolidate procedural measures, the use of information and communication tools to provide civil proceedings in the modern judicial system is also justified.","PeriodicalId":431008,"journal":{"name":"Oeconomia et Jus","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oeconomia et Jus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47026/2499-9636-2022-2-52-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the article is due to the fact that in civil proceedings, electronic evidence can be considered the most popular method of obtaining evidence to date. However, in law enforcement practice, there are many gaps in the formation of the institution of electronic evidence. The advantage of electronic evidence in civil proceedings is quite obvious, which makes it necessary to take a different look at this type of evidence. The courts, certainly, strive to respect the interests of the parties when considering cases on the basis of competition and equality of the parties, but the study of judicial practice shows that the presence of electronic evidence stands out against the other evidence and acquires a special status that requires research, detailed legislative development and procedural regulation. At the same time, it should be noted that there has been insufficient research on this topic in the scientific and procedural doctrine; in this connection, the opinions of researchers and their assessment are given. The purpose of the article is to determine the legal nature of electronic evidence in civil proceedings, especially in the context of the development of digitalization and electronic information technologies. The procedural legal, formal legal, logical, dialectical and other methods of scientific research make up the methodological basis. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the legal nature of electronic evidence is closely related to modern technical means, and the position on the need to consolidate procedural measures, the use of information and communication tools to provide civil proceedings in the modern judicial system is also justified.
数字化背景下民事诉讼中电子证据的法律性质
这篇文章的相关性是由于在民事诉讼中,电子证据可以被认为是迄今为止最流行的获取证据的方法。然而,在执法实践中,我国电子证据制度的形成还存在许多空白。电子证据在民事诉讼中的优势非常明显,因此有必要对这类证据进行不同的研究。法院在审理案件时,当然会在当事人竞争、平等的基础上努力尊重当事人的利益,但司法实践的研究表明,电子证据的存在在其他证据中脱颖而出,具有特殊的地位,这需要研究,需要详细的立法发展和程序规范。同时,需要注意的是,科学主义和程序主义对这一问题的研究还不够充分;在这方面,给出了研究人员的意见和评价。本文的目的是确定民事诉讼中电子证据的法律性质,特别是在数字化和电子信息技术发展的背景下。程序法、形式法、逻辑法、辩证法等科学研究方法构成了方法论基础。根据研究结果,认为电子证据的法律性质与现代技术手段密切相关,关于需要巩固程序措施的立场,在现代司法制度中利用信息和通信工具提供民事诉讼也是有道理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信