Moving on to surgical stage of glaucoma treatment

V. Erichev, S. N. Basinsky, A. Kuroyedov
{"title":"Moving on to surgical stage of glaucoma treatment","authors":"V. Erichev, S. N. Basinsky, A. Kuroyedov","doi":"10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-92-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making a decision about the need for surgical intervention in glaucoma patients is not easy, and the rationale for it involves a balanced approach based on numerous objective, as well as, unfortunately, subjective factors. Therapeutic approaches in modern glaucomatology have temporarily, and as it seems, for quite some time, have shifted towards active observational therapeutic strategy, which brought negative results expressed in deteriorating outcomes of surgical treatment. At the same time, it is obvious that not all indications for surgical treatment have the same \"weight\", which also determines the need for a differentiated approach. The discussion about the decisionmaking time for transition to surgical tactics of glaucoma treatment has been repeatedly discussed, is being discussed, and will continue to be discussed in the professional circles, with new arguments arising due to clarification of the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, active use of interdisciplinary approaches, emergence of new tools, devices and technologies, coupled with improvement of surgical skills, increase in the life expectancy of the population, as well as the need for rational assessment of socio-economic resources of the state and the individual. This review describes the generalized experience and the authors' own point of view on this problem.","PeriodicalId":129515,"journal":{"name":"National Journal glaucoma","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-92-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Making a decision about the need for surgical intervention in glaucoma patients is not easy, and the rationale for it involves a balanced approach based on numerous objective, as well as, unfortunately, subjective factors. Therapeutic approaches in modern glaucomatology have temporarily, and as it seems, for quite some time, have shifted towards active observational therapeutic strategy, which brought negative results expressed in deteriorating outcomes of surgical treatment. At the same time, it is obvious that not all indications for surgical treatment have the same "weight", which also determines the need for a differentiated approach. The discussion about the decisionmaking time for transition to surgical tactics of glaucoma treatment has been repeatedly discussed, is being discussed, and will continue to be discussed in the professional circles, with new arguments arising due to clarification of the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, active use of interdisciplinary approaches, emergence of new tools, devices and technologies, coupled with improvement of surgical skills, increase in the life expectancy of the population, as well as the need for rational assessment of socio-economic resources of the state and the individual. This review describes the generalized experience and the authors' own point of view on this problem.
接下来是青光眼的手术治疗阶段
决定青光眼患者是否需要手术干预并不容易,其基本原理涉及基于众多客观因素的平衡方法,以及不幸的是,主观因素。现代青光眼的治疗方法已经暂时转向了积极的观察治疗策略,这在相当长的一段时间内似乎已经转向了积极的观察治疗策略,这带来了消极的结果,表现为手术治疗结果的恶化。同时,很明显,并非所有的手术治疗适应症都具有相同的“权重”,这也决定了需要区分入路。青光眼治疗转向手术策略的决策时间的讨论在专业领域已经反复讨论,正在讨论,并将继续讨论,由于青光眼视神经病变病理生理的澄清,跨学科方法的积极使用,新工具、设备和技术的出现,加上手术技术的提高,产生了新的争论。人口预期寿命的增加,以及合理评估国家和个人社会经济资源的必要性。本文叙述了笔者在这一问题上的一般经验和自己的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信