Party Discipline and the Electoral Process in Nigeria\'s Fourth Republic (1999-2005): An Analysis of Problems and Prospects

Remi Anifowose, A. Akinbobola
{"title":"Party Discipline and the Electoral Process in Nigeria\\'s Fourth Republic (1999-2005): An Analysis of Problems and Prospects","authors":"Remi Anifowose, A. Akinbobola","doi":"10.4314/LHR.V5I1.32527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the fact that the most important institution in a democracy is the political party, the paper appraises the degree to which discipline is maintained among party members and the impact of this on governance in Nigeria\\'s Fourth Republic. It is evident in the paper that party discipline is at the low ebb in the Fourth Republic when compared with previous regimes. This is discernible from the ease with which party members cross-carpet from one party to the other thus betraying the public trust reposed in them by the electorate who voted them into their respective elective offices. Party disagreements and differences are often advertised regrettably in the print and electronic media. The paper argues that every political party should institutionalize party primaries as a vehicle to promote democratic culture and enhance democratic political socialization. None of the three dominant parties—the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP), and the Alliance for Democracy—conducted any meaningful primaries. Even when primaries were conducted these were marked by irregularities and discontent. Indeed candidates were largely selected on the basis of preferment. The paper contends that any political party whose members are not sufficiently disciplined to conduct effective primaries cannot succeed in any inter-party political process. Lagos Historical Review , vol. 5 (2005), 111-130","PeriodicalId":339050,"journal":{"name":"Lagos Historical Review","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lagos Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LHR.V5I1.32527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the fact that the most important institution in a democracy is the political party, the paper appraises the degree to which discipline is maintained among party members and the impact of this on governance in Nigeria\'s Fourth Republic. It is evident in the paper that party discipline is at the low ebb in the Fourth Republic when compared with previous regimes. This is discernible from the ease with which party members cross-carpet from one party to the other thus betraying the public trust reposed in them by the electorate who voted them into their respective elective offices. Party disagreements and differences are often advertised regrettably in the print and electronic media. The paper argues that every political party should institutionalize party primaries as a vehicle to promote democratic culture and enhance democratic political socialization. None of the three dominant parties—the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP), and the Alliance for Democracy—conducted any meaningful primaries. Even when primaries were conducted these were marked by irregularities and discontent. Indeed candidates were largely selected on the basis of preferment. The paper contends that any political party whose members are not sufficiently disciplined to conduct effective primaries cannot succeed in any inter-party political process. Lagos Historical Review , vol. 5 (2005), 111-130
尼日利亚第四共和国的党纪与选举过程(1999-2005):问题与展望分析
鉴于民主制度中最重要的机构是政党,本文评估了在尼日利亚第四共和国党员中保持纪律的程度及其对治理的影响。在论文中可以明显看出,与以前的政权相比,第四共和国的党纪处于低潮。这一点可以从党员轻易地从一个政党转到另一个政党中看出,从而背叛了选民投票给他们进入各自选举职位的公众对他们的信任。政党间的分歧和分歧常常令人遗憾地刊登在印刷和电子媒体上。本文认为,各政党都应将党内初选制度化,作为推进民主文化、促进民主政治社会化的载体。三个主要政党——人民民主党(PDP)、全尼日利亚人民党(ANPP)和民主联盟——都没有进行任何有意义的初选。即使在初选进行的时候,也充斥着不规范和不满。事实上,候选人在很大程度上是根据晋升来选择的。本文认为,任何政党,如果其成员没有足够的纪律来进行有效的初选,就不可能在任何政党间的政治进程中取得成功。拉各斯历史评论,卷5 (2005),111-130
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信