An Exploratory Health Outcome Analysis of Lumbar Surgery Patients Utilizing Korean Medical Services: Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patients Sample (HIRA-NPS 2019) Data

Hye-Yoon Lee, Namkwen Kim, Yun-kyung Song
{"title":"An Exploratory Health Outcome Analysis of Lumbar Surgery Patients Utilizing Korean Medical Services: Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patients Sample (HIRA-NPS 2019) Data","authors":"Hye-Yoon Lee, Namkwen Kim, Yun-kyung Song","doi":"10.30581/jcmm.2022.17.2.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aimed to analyze the medical utilization of low back pain (LBP) patients after back surgery and estimate the medical costs of Korean and Western medicine collaborative treatment, odds ratio, and hazard ratio between the two groups using the 2019 Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patient Sample (HIRA-NPS-2019). Methods Data management and descriptive analysis, logistic regression, and survival analysis were conducted for defining and estimating the LBP patients after back surgery in the NPS 2019 dataset. Results A total of 216,424 patients out of 991,189 were identified as having LBP. Among the patients with LBP, 1,734 were treated with surgery while 214,690 were not. Among those who had surgery, 937 were treated with conventional treatments only and 797 underwent Korean medicine treatments. The odds ratio of the logistic regression analysis was 0.7129, suggesting that Korean medical treatment experience group had a 28.7% lower risk of reoperation than the Western medical treatments only group. The hazard ratio of the survival analysis was 0.9145; thus, the risk probability of reoperation was estimated to be approximately 8.55% lower. The 50% risk of reoperation was 69 days (0.5044) for the conventional group, and 97 days (0.5008) for the Korean medical group in the survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier graph. Conclusions These results could be utilized in future studies in conducting economic evaluation for estimating cost-effectiveness of Western medicine and Korean medicine treatment compared to Western medicine alone in LBP patients after back surgery in a South Korean perspective. mended and should be applied while taking the necessary precautions.","PeriodicalId":430318,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30581/jcmm.2022.17.2.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to analyze the medical utilization of low back pain (LBP) patients after back surgery and estimate the medical costs of Korean and Western medicine collaborative treatment, odds ratio, and hazard ratio between the two groups using the 2019 Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patient Sample (HIRA-NPS-2019). Methods Data management and descriptive analysis, logistic regression, and survival analysis were conducted for defining and estimating the LBP patients after back surgery in the NPS 2019 dataset. Results A total of 216,424 patients out of 991,189 were identified as having LBP. Among the patients with LBP, 1,734 were treated with surgery while 214,690 were not. Among those who had surgery, 937 were treated with conventional treatments only and 797 underwent Korean medicine treatments. The odds ratio of the logistic regression analysis was 0.7129, suggesting that Korean medical treatment experience group had a 28.7% lower risk of reoperation than the Western medical treatments only group. The hazard ratio of the survival analysis was 0.9145; thus, the risk probability of reoperation was estimated to be approximately 8.55% lower. The 50% risk of reoperation was 69 days (0.5044) for the conventional group, and 97 days (0.5008) for the Korean medical group in the survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier graph. Conclusions These results could be utilized in future studies in conducting economic evaluation for estimating cost-effectiveness of Western medicine and Korean medicine treatment compared to Western medicine alone in LBP patients after back surgery in a South Korean perspective. mended and should be applied while taking the necessary precautions.
腰椎手术患者利用韩国医疗服务的探索性健康结果分析:使用健康保险审查和评估服务-国家患者样本(HIRA-NPS 2019)数据
目的利用2019年健康保险审查与评估服务国家患者样本(HIRA-NPS-2019),分析背部手术后腰痛(LBP)患者的医疗利用情况,估计两组韩西药协同治疗的医疗费用、优势比和风险比。方法对NPS 2019数据集中的腰痛患者进行数据管理、描述性分析、logistic回归和生存分析,以确定和估计背部手术后腰痛患者。结果991189例患者中有216424例被确诊为腰痛。在LBP患者中,1734人接受了手术治疗,214690人没有接受手术治疗。接受手术的患者中,937人接受了常规治疗,797人接受了韩国药物治疗。logistic回归分析的优势比为0.7129,韩国医疗经验组再手术风险比单纯西医治疗组低28.7%。生存分析的风险比为0.9145;因此,估计再次手术的风险概率约为8.55%。Kaplan-Meier图生存分析中,常规组50%的再手术风险为69天(0.5044),韩国医疗组为97天(0.5008)。结论这些结果可用于未来的研究,以韩国的视角对腰痛患者进行经济评估,以评估西医和韩医治疗与西医单独治疗相比的成本效益。在采取必要的预防措施的同时修补并应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信