Posterior communicating artery aneurysms: Analysis of predictors of surgical outcome

Sumeet Narang, H. Kaur, J. Dil, A. Raja
{"title":"Posterior communicating artery aneurysms: Analysis of predictors of surgical outcome","authors":"Sumeet Narang, H. Kaur, J. Dil, A. Raja","doi":"10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_16_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although aneurysms of the posterior circulation are not as common as those of the anterior circulation, the threat they pose can be reduced with timely surgical intervention. The study analyses factors that influence the outcome in surgically clipped posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 85 cases of surgically clipped PCoA aneurysms was carried out, taking into consideration, the presenting signs and World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS) grade at admission, the timing of the surgery and the outcome of the surgery as per the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Results: About 56.8% of cases were clinically WFNS Grade I at admission. About 75.9% of all patients and 90% of patients who were Grade I and 74% of patients who were Grade II had a good recovery as per the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The overall mortality was 6.9%, and all patients who did not survive despite surgery were initially WFNS Grade IV patients. Conclusion: A higher or clinically worse WFNS grade of subarachnoid haemorrhage at the time of admission in patients with PCoA aneurysms predicts a poor surgical outcome, regardless of the timing of the surgery.","PeriodicalId":218723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_16_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although aneurysms of the posterior circulation are not as common as those of the anterior circulation, the threat they pose can be reduced with timely surgical intervention. The study analyses factors that influence the outcome in surgically clipped posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 85 cases of surgically clipped PCoA aneurysms was carried out, taking into consideration, the presenting signs and World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS) grade at admission, the timing of the surgery and the outcome of the surgery as per the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Results: About 56.8% of cases were clinically WFNS Grade I at admission. About 75.9% of all patients and 90% of patients who were Grade I and 74% of patients who were Grade II had a good recovery as per the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The overall mortality was 6.9%, and all patients who did not survive despite surgery were initially WFNS Grade IV patients. Conclusion: A higher or clinically worse WFNS grade of subarachnoid haemorrhage at the time of admission in patients with PCoA aneurysms predicts a poor surgical outcome, regardless of the timing of the surgery.
后交通动脉瘤:手术预后的预测因素分析
背景:虽然后循环动脉瘤不像前循环动脉瘤那样常见,但及时的手术干预可以减少其构成的威胁。本研究分析了影响手术夹闭后交通动脉(PCoA)动脉瘤预后的因素。方法:回顾性分析85例经手术夹闭的PCoA动脉瘤,根据患者入院时的表现、世界神经学会联合会(WFNS)评分、手术时间和格拉斯哥预后评分标准对手术结果进行分析。结果:56.8%的患者入院时临床WFNS为I级。根据格拉斯哥结果量表,约75.9%的患者、90%的I级患者和74%的II级患者恢复良好。总死亡率为6.9%,所有手术后未能存活的患者最初均为WFNS IV级患者。结论:PCoA动脉瘤患者入院时蛛网膜下腔出血的WFNS分级较高或临床较差预示着较差的手术结果,与手术时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信