Conclusion

Neilan S. Chaturvedi
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Neilan S. Chaturvedi","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197599723.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 7 summarizes that while moderates are often considered to be the power players in Senate politics, in reality they are minimizing their traceability to salient legislation. Indeed, moderates rarely offer amendments or speak in support or opposition of legislation, and frequently vote against their preferences. Behind the scenes, while they work about as hard as their colleagues, they are frequently unsatisfied with the legislative outcome and are not viewed as particularly influential by their colleagues. With increased polarization, the skyrocketing use of the filibuster, and leadership concerned more with winning elections than legislating, we should expect to see fewer broad coalitions built as moderates are unwilling and incapable of playing a pivotal role. Still, moderates are not ineffective legislators—they are about as effective as their colleagues; they are simply not the pivotal players that the media and political science scholarship views them to be.","PeriodicalId":330273,"journal":{"name":"Life in the Middle","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life in the Middle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197599723.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 7 summarizes that while moderates are often considered to be the power players in Senate politics, in reality they are minimizing their traceability to salient legislation. Indeed, moderates rarely offer amendments or speak in support or opposition of legislation, and frequently vote against their preferences. Behind the scenes, while they work about as hard as their colleagues, they are frequently unsatisfied with the legislative outcome and are not viewed as particularly influential by their colleagues. With increased polarization, the skyrocketing use of the filibuster, and leadership concerned more with winning elections than legislating, we should expect to see fewer broad coalitions built as moderates are unwilling and incapable of playing a pivotal role. Still, moderates are not ineffective legislators—they are about as effective as their colleagues; they are simply not the pivotal players that the media and political science scholarship views them to be.
结论
第七章总结说,虽然温和派通常被认为是参议院政治中的权力参与者,但实际上他们正在尽量减少对重要立法的可追溯性。事实上,温和派很少提出修正案,也很少发表支持或反对立法的言论,而且经常投票反对他们的偏好。在幕后,虽然他们和他们的同事一样努力工作,但他们经常对立法结果不满意,在同事眼中也没有特别的影响力。随着两极分化加剧,阻挠议事的使用激增,以及领导层更关心赢得选举而不是立法,我们应该看到更少的广泛联盟的建立,因为温和派不愿意也没有能力发挥关键作用。然而,温和派并不是无效的立法者——他们和他们的同事一样有效;他们根本不是媒体和政治学学者所认为的关键角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信