Book Reviews: Robert Karl Gnuse, NO OTHER GODS: EMERGENT MONOTHEISM IN ISRAEL. JSOT Supplement Series, 241; Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997. Pp. 392. Cloth, $78.00

John F. Craghan
{"title":"Book Reviews: Robert Karl Gnuse, NO OTHER GODS: EMERGENT MONOTHEISM IN ISRAEL. JSOT Supplement Series, 241; Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997. Pp. 392. Cloth, $78.00","authors":"John F. Craghan","doi":"10.1177/014610799802800306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ideational and social implications of that emergent monotheism&dquo; (p. 7). As the author notes elsewhere (p. 19), this book is calculated to be, not an original systematic treatment, but rather a synthesized overview. For Gnuse the emergence of monotheism in ancient Israel was both a revolutionary and an evolutionary process. To begin, the author reviews the three traditional models of the settlement process; (1) gradual, peaceful infiltration (A. Alt, M. Noth, M. Weippert); (2) violent conquest (W. F. Albright, G. E. Wright); and (3) internal revolution (G. Mendenhall, N. Gottwald). He then observes the newer view of the process, which contains four elements. First, there is a peaceful withdrawal from Canaanite cities to Palestinian highlands during Iron Age I (1200-1050 BCE). Second, there is the factor of internal nomadism or the symbiosis hypothesis. As expressed by I. Finkelstein, the Israelites were &dquo;enclosed nomads&dquo; who lived in Palestine through the Late Bronze Age (1550-1200 BCE) in proximity to urban centers but without settling. Third, there is peaceful transition or transformation. Israel evolved as a distinctly natural highland experience of population growth. Fourth, there is peaceful amalgamation or synthesis. This element underlines the diversity of the people who would constitute Israel. Consequently Israel &dquo;did not arise in violent","PeriodicalId":227137,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799802800306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ideational and social implications of that emergent monotheism&dquo; (p. 7). As the author notes elsewhere (p. 19), this book is calculated to be, not an original systematic treatment, but rather a synthesized overview. For Gnuse the emergence of monotheism in ancient Israel was both a revolutionary and an evolutionary process. To begin, the author reviews the three traditional models of the settlement process; (1) gradual, peaceful infiltration (A. Alt, M. Noth, M. Weippert); (2) violent conquest (W. F. Albright, G. E. Wright); and (3) internal revolution (G. Mendenhall, N. Gottwald). He then observes the newer view of the process, which contains four elements. First, there is a peaceful withdrawal from Canaanite cities to Palestinian highlands during Iron Age I (1200-1050 BCE). Second, there is the factor of internal nomadism or the symbiosis hypothesis. As expressed by I. Finkelstein, the Israelites were &dquo;enclosed nomads&dquo; who lived in Palestine through the Late Bronze Age (1550-1200 BCE) in proximity to urban centers but without settling. Third, there is peaceful transition or transformation. Israel evolved as a distinctly natural highland experience of population growth. Fourth, there is peaceful amalgamation or synthesis. This element underlines the diversity of the people who would constitute Israel. Consequently Israel &dquo;did not arise in violent
书评:罗伯特·卡尔·格努斯,没有其他的神:以色列新兴的一神论。JSOT增补系列,第241期;谢菲尔德,英国:谢菲尔德学术出版社,1997。392页。布,78.00美元
新兴的一神论的观念和社会含义;(第7页)。正如作者在其他地方(第19页)指出的那样,这本书的目的不是原创的系统论述,而是综合的概述。对于Gnuse来说,一神论在古代以色列的出现既是一个革命的过程,也是一个进化的过程。首先,作者回顾了结算过程的三种传统模型;(1)渐进、和平渗透(A. Alt, M. north, M. Weippert);(2)暴力征服(W. F.奥尔布赖特,G. E.赖特);(3)内部革命(G. Mendenhall, N. Gottwald)。然后,他观察了该过程的更新视图,其中包含四个元素。首先,在铁器时代I(公元前1200-1050年),迦南人从城市和平撤退到巴勒斯坦高地。二是内部游牧民因素或共生假说。正如芬克尔斯坦(I. Finkelstein)所说,以色列人是封闭的游牧民族;他们在青铜时代晚期(公元前1550-1200年)居住在巴勒斯坦,靠近城市中心,但没有定居下来。第三,和平过渡或转型。以色列是一个人口增长明显的自然高地。第四,和平合并或综合。这一因素强调了构成以色列的人民的多样性。因此,以色列并没有在暴力中崛起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信