The Idea of “Proactive Library” in R.A. Baryshev’s Monograph and Dissertation as Manifestation of Dilettantism

Y. Stolyarov
{"title":"The Idea of “Proactive Library” in R.A. Baryshev’s Monograph and Dissertation as Manifestation of Dilettantism","authors":"Y. Stolyarov","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-413-421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The monograph “Proactive library in the information and educational environment of University” (2020) and the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences “University library as a proactive system: modern opportunities and development prospects” (2022; rejected by the Dissertation Council upon the results of defense) by R.A. Baryshev use methodologically flawed basis and theoretically are untenable. The monograph and dissertation on the so-called proactive university library as a system do not contain scientific novelty and of no practical value.The main idea of the “proactive library” is to focus on anticipating readers’ requests and, therefore, it requires reliance on forecasting methodology. However, the author of the monograph and dissertation presents other methodological grounds. The conceptual grounds that should form the essence of the theoretical development of the topic raised and should have theoretical novelty and scientific significance, in fact, are reduced to principles that have long been known and widely used in practice, and the key strategic directions that complement them, as the author himself notes, have been developed by an external institution. R.A. Baryshev did not show how the library services offered by him work ahead of requests. The monograph and dissertation do not contain information on what was exactly provided for in advance and what is the proportion of justified forecasts. The monograph was released without scientific review; it does not make any significant contribution to the library theory and practice. The main text is prepared on the materials of only one library — the Siberian Federal University, it has no grounds to claim generalizations that apply to all university libraries of the country. At the same time, the stated topic — forecasting of readers’ needs and requests and their preventive satisfaction — is of exceptional importance for library science and it requires qualified research.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2022-71-4-413-421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The monograph “Proactive library in the information and educational environment of University” (2020) and the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences “University library as a proactive system: modern opportunities and development prospects” (2022; rejected by the Dissertation Council upon the results of defense) by R.A. Baryshev use methodologically flawed basis and theoretically are untenable. The monograph and dissertation on the so-called proactive university library as a system do not contain scientific novelty and of no practical value.The main idea of the “proactive library” is to focus on anticipating readers’ requests and, therefore, it requires reliance on forecasting methodology. However, the author of the monograph and dissertation presents other methodological grounds. The conceptual grounds that should form the essence of the theoretical development of the topic raised and should have theoretical novelty and scientific significance, in fact, are reduced to principles that have long been known and widely used in practice, and the key strategic directions that complement them, as the author himself notes, have been developed by an external institution. R.A. Baryshev did not show how the library services offered by him work ahead of requests. The monograph and dissertation do not contain information on what was exactly provided for in advance and what is the proportion of justified forecasts. The monograph was released without scientific review; it does not make any significant contribution to the library theory and practice. The main text is prepared on the materials of only one library — the Siberian Federal University, it has no grounds to claim generalizations that apply to all university libraries of the country. At the same time, the stated topic — forecasting of readers’ needs and requests and their preventive satisfaction — is of exceptional importance for library science and it requires qualified research.
巴瑞雪夫专著与论文中的“主动图书馆”理念:业余爱好的表现
专著《高校信息教育环境中的主动图书馆》(2020)、教育学博士学位论文《作为主动系统的高校图书馆:现代机遇与发展前景》(2022);由R.A. Baryshev使用方法论上有缺陷的基础,在理论上是站不住脚的。所谓高校图书馆作为一个系统的前瞻性的专著和论文,没有科学的新颖性,也没有实用价值。“主动图书馆”的主要思想是关注于预测读者的需求,因此,它需要依赖于预测方法。然而,专著和论文的作者提出了其他方法论依据。本应构成本课题理论发展本质的概念依据,本应具有理论新颖性和科学意义,实际上却被简化为早已为人所知并在实践中得到广泛应用的原则,而与之相辅相成的关键战略方向,正如作者本人所指出的,已由外部机构制定出来。R.A.巴里舍夫没有说明他提供的图书馆服务是如何在请求之前工作的。专著和论文不包含信息,什么是准确提供了提前和什么是合理的预测的比例。这本专著没有经过科学审查就发表了;它对图书馆的理论和实践没有任何重大的贡献。主要文本是根据西伯利亚联邦大学这一图书馆的资料编写的,它没有理由声称适用于该国所有大学图书馆的普遍性。同时,预测读者的需求和要求及其预防性满意度这一主题对图书馆学具有特殊的重要性,需要进行合格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信