Use of Models in Reverse Thinking

Romans Vitkovskis, Uldis Heidingers
{"title":"Use of Models in Reverse Thinking","authors":"Romans Vitkovskis, Uldis Heidingers","doi":"10.17265/2161-6248/2018.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The fact that students tend to somewhat ignore the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects can be linked to their belief that the knowledge given in school on these subjects are hopelessly out of date, useless in everyday practice, and therefore, they lack motivation. This belief gets even stronger since the Internet is full with answers and ready-made solutions to handle all the question viewed during the study process. Comprehension of the subject and other things become insignificant if the subject itself is considered useless. For the subject not to be absolutely rejected, each course should include the basic philosophy, structure, and the themes currently viewed in the field as well as the necessary minimum to start getting acquainted with the topicalities of the subject. It is obvious that in a STEM subject (the study courses of STEM subjects have less or almost enough information to start getting acquainted with the topicalities) the comprehension is important. If it lacks, the student starts to dislike and reject the subject. This is also true in everyday life when encountering new concepts, relations, engineer technical solutions, etc., new things. Therefore, alongside building motivation, means of gaining comprehension must be found and knowledge must be used not only in the field of the given subject. For this purpose, reverse thinking is the useful as described in this paper. If someone has the ability to reduce matters of a subject to fit other things of other persons or things previously known to him/her, it is an example of only restricted reverse thinking. If the person has the ability to do so unintentionally in any situation, it can be called reverse thinking as we understand it. Practice of creation and usage of the models in a given subject + models in other subjects and demonstration how this approach is used universally and intentionally show that this approach let you understand a lot of new things, gradually habituates to unintentional use the models and helps to “understand the idea,” and finally, leading to subconscious use of the models. Reverse thinking is one of phenomenons typical to the human brain and, as the eight years long practice shows (see http://www.goerudio.com), is actually possible. Students are able to create models that answer the question “why,” but the created model basis allows inventing or re-discovering the same thing again. This already is an experimental result and is available in the public space (see http://www.goerudio.com), showing the student models for STEM subject","PeriodicalId":159185,"journal":{"name":"US-China education review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US-China education review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2018.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 The fact that students tend to somewhat ignore the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects can be linked to their belief that the knowledge given in school on these subjects are hopelessly out of date, useless in everyday practice, and therefore, they lack motivation. This belief gets even stronger since the Internet is full with answers and ready-made solutions to handle all the question viewed during the study process. Comprehension of the subject and other things become insignificant if the subject itself is considered useless. For the subject not to be absolutely rejected, each course should include the basic philosophy, structure, and the themes currently viewed in the field as well as the necessary minimum to start getting acquainted with the topicalities of the subject. It is obvious that in a STEM subject (the study courses of STEM subjects have less or almost enough information to start getting acquainted with the topicalities) the comprehension is important. If it lacks, the student starts to dislike and reject the subject. This is also true in everyday life when encountering new concepts, relations, engineer technical solutions, etc., new things. Therefore, alongside building motivation, means of gaining comprehension must be found and knowledge must be used not only in the field of the given subject. For this purpose, reverse thinking is the useful as described in this paper. If someone has the ability to reduce matters of a subject to fit other things of other persons or things previously known to him/her, it is an example of only restricted reverse thinking. If the person has the ability to do so unintentionally in any situation, it can be called reverse thinking as we understand it. Practice of creation and usage of the models in a given subject + models in other subjects and demonstration how this approach is used universally and intentionally show that this approach let you understand a lot of new things, gradually habituates to unintentional use the models and helps to “understand the idea,” and finally, leading to subconscious use of the models. Reverse thinking is one of phenomenons typical to the human brain and, as the eight years long practice shows (see http://www.goerudio.com), is actually possible. Students are able to create models that answer the question “why,” but the created model basis allows inventing or re-discovering the same thing again. This already is an experimental result and is available in the public space (see http://www.goerudio.com), showing the student models for STEM subject
模型在逆向思维中的运用
学生倾向于忽略科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)科目的事实可能与他们认为学校所教授的这些科目的知识已经过时,在日常实践中毫无用处的信念有关,因此,他们缺乏动力。这种信念变得更加强烈,因为互联网上充满了答案和现成的解决方案来处理在学习过程中看到的所有问题。如果主题本身被认为是无用的,那么对主题和其他事物的理解就变得无关紧要。为了使这门学科不被完全拒绝,每门课程都应该包括基本的哲学、结构和当前在该领域所看到的主题,以及开始熟悉这门学科的话题所必需的最低限度的内容。很明显,在STEM学科中(STEM学科的学习课程很少或几乎足够的信息来开始熟悉话题),理解是很重要的。如果缺乏,学生就会开始不喜欢和排斥这门学科。在日常生活中遇到新的概念、关系、工程技术解决方案等新事物时也是如此。因此,除了建立动机外,还必须找到获得理解的方法,并且知识必须不仅在给定主题的领域中使用。为此目的,逆向思维是有用的,如本文所述。如果一个人有能力将一个主题的事情简化为适合其他人的其他事情或他/她以前知道的事情,这是一个局限的反向思维的例子。如果一个人在任何情况下都有能力无意识地这样做,我们可以称之为逆向思维。在给定科目中创建和使用模型+在其他科目中使用模型的实践,以及演示这种方法是如何普遍和有意地使用的,表明这种方法让你理解了很多新事物,逐渐习惯了无意中使用模型,并有助于“理解想法”,最终导致潜意识地使用模型。逆向思维是人类大脑的典型现象之一,正如长达8年的实践所表明的那样(见http://www.goerudio.com),逆向思维实际上是可能的。学生能够创建模型来回答“为什么”这个问题,但是创建的模型基础允许再次发明或重新发现相同的事情。这已经是一个实验结果,可以在公共空间(见http://www.goerudio.com),展示了STEM学科的学生模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信