Formuojamojo vertinimo raiška Lietuvos mokyklose: ką rodo nacionaliniai mokinių pasiekimų tyrimai?

Irena Raudienė
{"title":"Formuojamojo vertinimo raiška Lietuvos mokyklose: ką rodo nacionaliniai mokinių pasiekimų tyrimai?","authors":"Irena Raudienė","doi":"10.15823/su.2018.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current challenges of Lithuanian education system are reflected in the poor learning outcomes as indicated by national and international student achievement surveys: a relatively small number of Lithuanian students perform at the highest achievement levels in PISA and the average performance of 15-year-olds trails that of its Baltic neighbours (OECD, 2017). The influence of low socio-economic status of student families on disparities in learning outcomes is also a big concern for the country. The scientific research provides some insights into how student achievement could benefit if certain educational policies and practices were adopted. The works of Hattie (2009), Black and Wiliam (1998), Wiliam (2012) focus on effective feedback techniques and formative assessment strategies that are proved to contribute to high learning gains. In Lithuania students’ achievement surveys were carried out in 2014 and 2015, the results represent students’ perspective on how formative assessment is implemented at schools and what are the effects of some variables that are attributed to formative assessment on learning outcomes. In the article, national tendencies related to implementation of formative assessment based on survey results are discussed and compared to international trends. The analysis revealed that the use of formative assessment in Lithuanian schools is not effective enough to improve student learning. Policy makers should prioritize formative assessment policies and invest into teacher training. Keywords: formative assessment, effective feedback, assessment of student achievement.","PeriodicalId":303026,"journal":{"name":"Socialinis ugdymas","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialinis ugdymas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15823/su.2018.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current challenges of Lithuanian education system are reflected in the poor learning outcomes as indicated by national and international student achievement surveys: a relatively small number of Lithuanian students perform at the highest achievement levels in PISA and the average performance of 15-year-olds trails that of its Baltic neighbours (OECD, 2017). The influence of low socio-economic status of student families on disparities in learning outcomes is also a big concern for the country. The scientific research provides some insights into how student achievement could benefit if certain educational policies and practices were adopted. The works of Hattie (2009), Black and Wiliam (1998), Wiliam (2012) focus on effective feedback techniques and formative assessment strategies that are proved to contribute to high learning gains. In Lithuania students’ achievement surveys were carried out in 2014 and 2015, the results represent students’ perspective on how formative assessment is implemented at schools and what are the effects of some variables that are attributed to formative assessment on learning outcomes. In the article, national tendencies related to implementation of formative assessment based on survey results are discussed and compared to international trends. The analysis revealed that the use of formative assessment in Lithuanian schools is not effective enough to improve student learning. Policy makers should prioritize formative assessment policies and invest into teacher training. Keywords: formative assessment, effective feedback, assessment of student achievement.
立陶宛教育体系目前面临的挑战反映在国家和国际学生成绩调查显示的糟糕的学习成果上:相对较少的立陶宛学生在PISA中达到最高成绩水平,15岁学生的平均表现落后于其波罗的海邻国(经合组织,2017年)。学生家庭的低社会经济地位对学习成果差异的影响也是该国的一大关切。科学研究提供了一些见解,说明如果采用某些教育政策和实践,学生的成绩将如何受益。Hattie(2009)、Black和william(1998)、william(2012)的研究重点是有效的反馈技术和形成性评估策略,这些都被证明有助于提高学习收益。在立陶宛,2014年和2015年进行了学生成就调查,结果代表了学生对学校如何实施形成性评估的看法,以及归因于形成性评估的一些变量对学习成果的影响。本文讨论了基于调查结果实施形成性评价的国家趋势,并与国际趋势进行了比较。分析显示,在立陶宛学校使用形成性评估不足以有效提高学生的学习。决策者应优先考虑形成性评估政策,并投资于教师培训。关键词:形成性评价,有效反馈,学生成绩评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信