Environmental Regionalism in the Caspian Sea: A Functionalist Approach

A. Bayramov
{"title":"Environmental Regionalism in the Caspian Sea: A Functionalist Approach","authors":"A. Bayramov","doi":"10.46692/9781529217162.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that the new literature on comparative regionalism should keep away from classical functionalism because it is an idealistic theory and it does not supposed to explain regional integration other than the EU. Against this established backdrop, the starting point of this chapter is to challenge this perception and demonstrate the usefulness of classical functionalism’s relevance to contemporary regionalism and regionalizing process in the Caspian. This chapter revises functionalism via social constructivist insights. Integrating constructivist assumptions broadens the theoretical contours of functionalism and adds a richer understanding of regional integration process highlighted by functionalism. Empirically, this chapter examines environmental regionalism in the Caspian Sea. More specifically, it shows how common environmental issues challenged the individual littoral states and brought their respective governments under the Caspian Environmental Program (CEP) in 1998. Lessons learned from environmental cooperation have spilled over into the discussion on the uncertain legal status of the sea, which culminated in the signing of the Legal Status Convention.","PeriodicalId":425075,"journal":{"name":"Globalizing Regionalism and International Relations","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalizing Regionalism and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529217162.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is argued that the new literature on comparative regionalism should keep away from classical functionalism because it is an idealistic theory and it does not supposed to explain regional integration other than the EU. Against this established backdrop, the starting point of this chapter is to challenge this perception and demonstrate the usefulness of classical functionalism’s relevance to contemporary regionalism and regionalizing process in the Caspian. This chapter revises functionalism via social constructivist insights. Integrating constructivist assumptions broadens the theoretical contours of functionalism and adds a richer understanding of regional integration process highlighted by functionalism. Empirically, this chapter examines environmental regionalism in the Caspian Sea. More specifically, it shows how common environmental issues challenged the individual littoral states and brought their respective governments under the Caspian Environmental Program (CEP) in 1998. Lessons learned from environmental cooperation have spilled over into the discussion on the uncertain legal status of the sea, which culminated in the signing of the Legal Status Convention.
里海的环境区域主义:一种功能主义方法
比较区域主义是一种理想主义理论,它不应该解释欧盟以外的区域一体化,因此比较区域主义的新文献应该远离古典功能主义。在这种既定的背景下,本章的出发点是挑战这种看法,并展示古典功能主义与里海当代地区主义和区域化进程的相关性的有用性。本章通过社会建构主义的观点来修正功能主义。整合建构主义假设拓宽了功能主义的理论轮廓,丰富了对功能主义所强调的区域一体化过程的理解。本章从经验上考察里海的环境区域主义。更具体地说,它显示了共同的环境问题如何挑战个别沿海国家,并将各自的政府纳入1998年的里海环境计划(CEP)。从环境合作中吸取的教训已蔓延到关于海洋法律地位不确定的讨论中,这种讨论最终导致了《法律地位公约》的签署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信