Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) Assay and Direct Binding ELISA (S-IgG) with the Cytopathic Effect Assay (CPE) in Analyzing the Neutralization Antibody of Vaccination People

Xiiang Yang
{"title":"Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) Assay and Direct Binding ELISA (S-IgG) with the Cytopathic Effect Assay (CPE) in Analyzing the Neutralization Antibody of Vaccination People","authors":"Xiiang Yang","doi":"10.24966/CIIT-8844/1000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) Assay and Direct Binding ELISA (S-IgG) with the Cytopathic Effect Assay (CPE) in Analyzing the Neutralization of Vaccination Abstract The safety and effectiveness of the COVID19 vaccine are the key in vaccine development. Due to the difficulty and dangerous of virus neutralization experiment, many replacement assays were de- veloped for testing neutralization antibody. In this report, two kits that based on the competition assay (cPass sVAT) and based on direct antigen binding assay(S-IgG) were compared. The positive rate of cPass sVAT kit and S-IgG assay was 72.9% and 84.2% respectively in 59 sample of vaccinators. Both kit’s specificities reached 100% in 46 health control samples. Quantity analysis of the S-IgG results found that 94.9% (56/59) of vaccinators have produced neutralizing antibodies. The total coincidence rate between cPass sVAT and CPE was 86%, similar to the coincidence rate between S-IgG and CPE, which was 84.2%. S-IgG is relatively more sensitive and easier in quantitating the neutralization antibodies than the other two experi- ments.","PeriodicalId":148952,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Immunology & Immunotherapy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Immunology & Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/CIIT-8844/1000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) Assay and Direct Binding ELISA (S-IgG) with the Cytopathic Effect Assay (CPE) in Analyzing the Neutralization of Vaccination Abstract The safety and effectiveness of the COVID19 vaccine are the key in vaccine development. Due to the difficulty and dangerous of virus neutralization experiment, many replacement assays were de- veloped for testing neutralization antibody. In this report, two kits that based on the competition assay (cPass sVAT) and based on direct antigen binding assay(S-IgG) were compared. The positive rate of cPass sVAT kit and S-IgG assay was 72.9% and 84.2% respectively in 59 sample of vaccinators. Both kit’s specificities reached 100% in 46 health control samples. Quantity analysis of the S-IgG results found that 94.9% (56/59) of vaccinators have produced neutralizing antibodies. The total coincidence rate between cPass sVAT and CPE was 86%, similar to the coincidence rate between S-IgG and CPE, which was 84.2%. S-IgG is relatively more sensitive and easier in quantitating the neutralization antibodies than the other two experi- ments.
SARS-CoV-2替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)和直接结合ELISA (S-IgG)与细胞病变效应试验(CPE)在疫苗接种人群中和抗体分析中的比较
SARS-CoV-2替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)和直接结合ELISA (S-IgG)与细胞病变效应试验(CPE)在疫苗中和分析中的比较摘要covid - 19疫苗的安全性和有效性是疫苗开发的关键。由于病毒中和实验的难度和危险性,人们开发了许多替代方法来检测病毒中和抗体。本报告比较了基于竞争分析法(cPass sVAT)和基于直接抗原结合分析法(S-IgG)的两种试剂盒。59例接种者cPass sVAT试剂盒阳性率为72.9%,S-IgG检测阳性率为84.2%。在46个健康对照样本中,这两种试剂盒的特异性均达到100%。S-IgG定量分析结果显示,94.9%(56/59)接种者产生了中和抗体。cPass sVAT与CPE的总符合率为86%,S-IgG与CPE的符合率为84.2%。与其他两种实验相比,S-IgG相对更敏感,更容易定量测定中和抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信