Money Talks: Gender Budgeting in the University of Iceland

Finnborg S. Steinþórsdóttir, Þorgerður J. Einarsdóttir, T. Heijstra, G. Pétursdóttir
{"title":"Money Talks: Gender Budgeting in the University of Iceland","authors":"Finnborg S. Steinþórsdóttir, Þorgerður J. Einarsdóttir, T. Heijstra, G. Pétursdóttir","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2016.12.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the financial framework, decision-making and budgeting processes of the University of Iceland from a gender perspective. The newly appointed rector of the University of Iceland (elected 2015) together with the university council is currently revising the UI system of the distribution formula of budget allocation. This provides an opportunity to examine the system which is inspired by New Public Management, with emphasis on global competition and performance based indicators. The aim of the article is to scrutinize the current system of budget allocation and distribution and its significance when it comes to gender. We ask how the, allegedly gender neutral, system plays out for different schools and disciplines and for academics in different ranks, when the gender dimension is taken into account. We draw on empirical data collected as part of the GARCIA research project, Gendering the Academy and Research combating Career Instability and Asymmetries, which is supported by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union. To shed a light on the process we focus on the male-dominated School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (SENS) and the more feminised School of Social Sciences (SSS). The exploration shows that the financial framework, decision-making and budgeting processes at the University of Iceland are rather non-transparent, and biased in favour of the natural sciences. This applies to funding from the state; third party funding; the allocation of funding in the teaching part of the budgeting, as well as the research part. From the article it can be concluded that the current system contains an internal, though unintended, gender bias that needs to be corrected.","PeriodicalId":294103,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2016.12.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The article addresses the financial framework, decision-making and budgeting processes of the University of Iceland from a gender perspective. The newly appointed rector of the University of Iceland (elected 2015) together with the university council is currently revising the UI system of the distribution formula of budget allocation. This provides an opportunity to examine the system which is inspired by New Public Management, with emphasis on global competition and performance based indicators. The aim of the article is to scrutinize the current system of budget allocation and distribution and its significance when it comes to gender. We ask how the, allegedly gender neutral, system plays out for different schools and disciplines and for academics in different ranks, when the gender dimension is taken into account. We draw on empirical data collected as part of the GARCIA research project, Gendering the Academy and Research combating Career Instability and Asymmetries, which is supported by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union. To shed a light on the process we focus on the male-dominated School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (SENS) and the more feminised School of Social Sciences (SSS). The exploration shows that the financial framework, decision-making and budgeting processes at the University of Iceland are rather non-transparent, and biased in favour of the natural sciences. This applies to funding from the state; third party funding; the allocation of funding in the teaching part of the budgeting, as well as the research part. From the article it can be concluded that the current system contains an internal, though unintended, gender bias that needs to be corrected.
金钱谈话:冰岛大学的性别预算
文章从性别角度论述了冰岛大学的财务框架、决策和预算编制过程。新任命的冰岛大学校长(2015年当选)与大学理事会目前正在修订预算分配公式的UI系统。这提供了一个机会来审查受新公共管理启发的制度,强调全球竞争和基于业绩的指标。本文的目的是审视当前的预算分配和分配制度及其在性别方面的意义。我们想知道,当考虑到性别因素时,这个号称性别中立的体系在不同的学校、学科和不同级别的学者中是如何发挥作用的。我们利用了作为加西亚研究项目的一部分收集的经验数据,该项目是由欧盟第七框架计划支持的,“性别化学院和研究对抗职业不稳定和不对称”。为了阐明这一过程,我们将重点放在男性主导的工程与自然科学学院(SENS)和女性主导的社会科学学院(SSS)上。研究表明,冰岛大学的财务框架、决策和预算过程相当不透明,而且偏向于自然科学。这适用于来自国家的资金;第三方资助;预算的教学部分以及研究部分的资金分配。从这篇文章中可以得出结论,目前的系统包含一种内部的,尽管是无意的,需要纠正的性别偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信