Confessional Hospitality

R. Kearney, M. Fitzpatrick
{"title":"Confessional Hospitality","authors":"R. Kearney, M. Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823294428.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at critical debates on religious hospitality-as-translation in contemporary political philosophy—notably in critical theory and Jürgen Habermas. Interestingly, Jürgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida, and Joseph Ratzinger all agree with Ricoeur on the central need for “hospitality” in our modern political discourse. While they speak from different perspectives—Habermas, secular; Derrida, Messianic; Ratzinger, Catholic—they all concur that hospitality offers a radical alternative, however complicated, to the infamous friend-enemy opposition made intellectually current by Samuel Huntington after 9/11. After analysing key aspects of these debates, the chapter ends by addressing the difficulties that arise in regard to Habermas’s model of secular hospitality to religion.","PeriodicalId":359072,"journal":{"name":"Radical Hospitality","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Hospitality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294428.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at critical debates on religious hospitality-as-translation in contemporary political philosophy—notably in critical theory and Jürgen Habermas. Interestingly, Jürgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida, and Joseph Ratzinger all agree with Ricoeur on the central need for “hospitality” in our modern political discourse. While they speak from different perspectives—Habermas, secular; Derrida, Messianic; Ratzinger, Catholic—they all concur that hospitality offers a radical alternative, however complicated, to the infamous friend-enemy opposition made intellectually current by Samuel Huntington after 9/11. After analysing key aspects of these debates, the chapter ends by addressing the difficulties that arise in regard to Habermas’s model of secular hospitality to religion.
忏悔的款待
本章着眼于当代政治哲学中关于宗教接待作为翻译的批判性辩论,特别是在批判理论和j根·哈贝马斯中。有趣的是,j根·哈贝马斯(rgen Habermas)、雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)和约瑟夫·拉辛格(Joseph Ratzinger)都同意利科尔的观点,即“好客”是我们现代政治话语的核心需求。虽然他们从不同的角度说话——哈贝马斯是世俗的;德里达,弥赛亚;拉辛格,天主教徒——他们都同意,对于塞缪尔·亨廷顿在9/11之后提出的臭名昭著的友敌对立,好客提供了一种激进的选择,尽管复杂。在分析了这些辩论的关键方面之后,本章以解决哈贝马斯对宗教的世俗好客模式所产生的困难作为结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信