Unit Pricing in Supermarkets: Review of Past Evidence from Academic and Industry Studies

S. Bogomolova, I. Jarratt
{"title":"Unit Pricing in Supermarkets: Review of Past Evidence from Academic and Industry Studies","authors":"S. Bogomolova, I. Jarratt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2853977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This document was prepared to inform the work of the International Standards Organisation’s Committee ISP/PC 294 developing a guidance standard for unit pricing. Unit price (from now on UP) is the price per a standardised unit of measure presented to consumers at a point of sale (such as on a supermarket shelf). The document reviews existing studies conducted by academic and other organisations on UP, and summarises current legislative practices in different countries. \nKey recommendations for the development of a Unit Price guidance standard: \nPart 1 – Addressing awareness, barriers and benefits consumer awareness and usage of UP: \nConsumers demonstrated higher levels of UP awareness and usage in more recent studies (compared to those conducted in 70s/80s). This may be due to the longer presence of UP labels on the shelves. However, the level of UP usage varies considerably between studies with a lot of room for growth. \nWe recommend a two-part approach conducted simultaneously: \n1) Consistent, prominent and legible provision of UP across retailers (to ease consumer learning process by multiple exposures to UP); combined with, \n2) Mass communication program aimed to educate consumers on UP application in typical buying situations. A particular effort should be made to target low socioeconomic groups and younger consumers – both groups are the least likely to currently use UP, but are the most likely to benefit greatly from it. \nBenefits of UP: Research studies identified numerous benefits of UP including: \n• The ability to save money on groceries (by switching to cheaper alternatives); \n• Improved accuracy, speed and ease of decision-making; and \n• Better price recall, facilitating more well-informed decisions. \nWe recommend that UP education campaigns use the above benefits of UP, as these have been shown to be valuable outcomes for consumers. \nBarriers to UP adoption: \nPast research has pointed out a number of problems that could reduce UP usage by consumers, and its diligent provision by retailers. Issues with consumer (un)awareness or lack of understanding, and poor perceptions, could be addressed by changing consumer perceptions through education programs. Barriers to retail provision (such as cost of implementation, or lack of guidance on how best to do it) would require the systematic support and monitoring from the Government, for example, through subsidising the cost of UP installation for small retailers and consistent effort on further clarification of established UP principles – the aim of the best practice guidance standard. \nTo overcome the above-mentioned barriers, the UP information should be: \n• Presented at a point of sale in a consistent, prominent and legible manner across all retailers. This could be achieved with a unified best practice guide, and, potentially mandated provision and presentation guidelines; \n• Visual presentation of the UP should require very limited cognitive effort from consumers – it should be intuitively easy to use; \n• The UP information should be clearly marked as being different from the main selling price – to avoid any potential confusion among consumers; \n• The UP presentation should incorporate best practice on labeling and information processing, including the use of font type, size, height, color, verbal signposting (words “unit price”), and consistent and prominent position on price label clearly delineated from the main selling price. \nPart 2 – Specific recommendations regarding provision of UP Consistency of UP provision: \n• From consumer learning and adoption perspectives, the more retailers consistently provide UP information (in terms of display, units of measure used and products covered) the easier it is for consumers to learn and adopt UP. Consistency of provision is also likely to facilitate consumer education and reduce the time of adoption. • Mandatory UP schemes should be accompanied by requirements designed to achieve high levels of consistency in UP provision within and between retailers. \n• High levels of provision consistency when provision is voluntary are likely to be facilitated by the availability of best practice guides. These could also make it easier for retailers to voluntarily adopt UP provision, especially small and medium retailers who may not have special staff to make decisions about how UP should be provided. \nVisual presentation of UP - The following elements of the UP presentation influence how easily consumers can locate, attend to and use the UP information: \n• Font height (larger) is shown to facilitate ease of UP use. However, care should be taken not to create a confusion with the selling price; color highlight, empty space or dividers on price labels could also be used to separate the UP information from the rest of the price label thus creating a dedicated space for UP; \n• Positioning of the UP information in a prominent location on a price label could improve its use. Better locations are next to the main selling price because this is the most important part of the price label and consumers will naturally look in that area (as opposed to parts of the label where bar code or technical information is displayed); \n• Color (yellow or orange) is a good way to increase consumer attention to UP information, although potential cost implications for retailers have to be considered; \n• Showing the words “unit price” could be useful in some situations; care should be taken not to overload the price label and the area devoted to UP with too much “noise” – careful layout and font choices are important; \n• To reiterate the point of the previous section, consistency in visual presentation of the UP information across multiple retailers. If different retailers use different layouts, this will make it harder for consumers (who naturally shop across different stores) to find and use the UP.","PeriodicalId":321987,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2853977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This document was prepared to inform the work of the International Standards Organisation’s Committee ISP/PC 294 developing a guidance standard for unit pricing. Unit price (from now on UP) is the price per a standardised unit of measure presented to consumers at a point of sale (such as on a supermarket shelf). The document reviews existing studies conducted by academic and other organisations on UP, and summarises current legislative practices in different countries. Key recommendations for the development of a Unit Price guidance standard: Part 1 – Addressing awareness, barriers and benefits consumer awareness and usage of UP: Consumers demonstrated higher levels of UP awareness and usage in more recent studies (compared to those conducted in 70s/80s). This may be due to the longer presence of UP labels on the shelves. However, the level of UP usage varies considerably between studies with a lot of room for growth. We recommend a two-part approach conducted simultaneously: 1) Consistent, prominent and legible provision of UP across retailers (to ease consumer learning process by multiple exposures to UP); combined with, 2) Mass communication program aimed to educate consumers on UP application in typical buying situations. A particular effort should be made to target low socioeconomic groups and younger consumers – both groups are the least likely to currently use UP, but are the most likely to benefit greatly from it. Benefits of UP: Research studies identified numerous benefits of UP including: • The ability to save money on groceries (by switching to cheaper alternatives); • Improved accuracy, speed and ease of decision-making; and • Better price recall, facilitating more well-informed decisions. We recommend that UP education campaigns use the above benefits of UP, as these have been shown to be valuable outcomes for consumers. Barriers to UP adoption: Past research has pointed out a number of problems that could reduce UP usage by consumers, and its diligent provision by retailers. Issues with consumer (un)awareness or lack of understanding, and poor perceptions, could be addressed by changing consumer perceptions through education programs. Barriers to retail provision (such as cost of implementation, or lack of guidance on how best to do it) would require the systematic support and monitoring from the Government, for example, through subsidising the cost of UP installation for small retailers and consistent effort on further clarification of established UP principles – the aim of the best practice guidance standard. To overcome the above-mentioned barriers, the UP information should be: • Presented at a point of sale in a consistent, prominent and legible manner across all retailers. This could be achieved with a unified best practice guide, and, potentially mandated provision and presentation guidelines; • Visual presentation of the UP should require very limited cognitive effort from consumers – it should be intuitively easy to use; • The UP information should be clearly marked as being different from the main selling price – to avoid any potential confusion among consumers; • The UP presentation should incorporate best practice on labeling and information processing, including the use of font type, size, height, color, verbal signposting (words “unit price”), and consistent and prominent position on price label clearly delineated from the main selling price. Part 2 – Specific recommendations regarding provision of UP Consistency of UP provision: • From consumer learning and adoption perspectives, the more retailers consistently provide UP information (in terms of display, units of measure used and products covered) the easier it is for consumers to learn and adopt UP. Consistency of provision is also likely to facilitate consumer education and reduce the time of adoption. • Mandatory UP schemes should be accompanied by requirements designed to achieve high levels of consistency in UP provision within and between retailers. • High levels of provision consistency when provision is voluntary are likely to be facilitated by the availability of best practice guides. These could also make it easier for retailers to voluntarily adopt UP provision, especially small and medium retailers who may not have special staff to make decisions about how UP should be provided. Visual presentation of UP - The following elements of the UP presentation influence how easily consumers can locate, attend to and use the UP information: • Font height (larger) is shown to facilitate ease of UP use. However, care should be taken not to create a confusion with the selling price; color highlight, empty space or dividers on price labels could also be used to separate the UP information from the rest of the price label thus creating a dedicated space for UP; • Positioning of the UP information in a prominent location on a price label could improve its use. Better locations are next to the main selling price because this is the most important part of the price label and consumers will naturally look in that area (as opposed to parts of the label where bar code or technical information is displayed); • Color (yellow or orange) is a good way to increase consumer attention to UP information, although potential cost implications for retailers have to be considered; • Showing the words “unit price” could be useful in some situations; care should be taken not to overload the price label and the area devoted to UP with too much “noise” – careful layout and font choices are important; • To reiterate the point of the previous section, consistency in visual presentation of the UP information across multiple retailers. If different retailers use different layouts, this will make it harder for consumers (who naturally shop across different stores) to find and use the UP.
超市单位定价:对过去学术和行业研究证据的回顾
本文件旨在为国际标准组织委员会ISP/PC 294制定单位定价指导标准的工作提供信息。单位价格(从现在起)是在销售点(如超市货架上)呈现给消费者的每一个标准化度量单位的价格。该文件回顾了学术界和其他组织对UP进行的现有研究,并总结了不同国家当前的立法实践。制定单价指导标准的关键建议:第1部分-解决消费者对UP的意识、障碍和好处:在最近的研究中(与70年代/80年代进行的研究相比),消费者表现出更高水平的UP意识和使用。这可能是由于货架上UP标签的存在时间较长。然而,在不同的研究中,UP的使用水平差异很大,有很大的增长空间。我们建议同时进行两部分的方法:1)在零售商之间提供一致、突出和清晰的UP(通过多次接触UP来简化消费者的学习过程);2)大众传播计划,旨在教育消费者在典型购买情况下的UP应用。应该特别努力针对低社会经济群体和年轻消费者-这两个群体目前最不可能使用UP,但最有可能从中受益。UP的好处:研究确定了UP的许多好处,包括:•在杂货上省钱的能力(通过切换到更便宜的替代品);•提高决策的准确性、速度和便利性;•更好的价格召回,促进更明智的决策。我们建议UP教育活动利用UP的上述好处,因为这些已被证明是对消费者有价值的结果。UP采用的障碍:过去的研究已经指出了一些问题,这些问题可能会减少消费者对UP的使用,以及零售商对UP的勤勉供应。消费者(不)意识或缺乏理解的问题,以及不良观念,可以通过教育计划改变消费者的观念来解决。零售供应的障碍(例如实施成本,或缺乏关于如何最好地做到这一点的指导)将需要政府的系统支持和监测,例如,通过补贴小型零售商安装UP的费用,并不断努力进一步澄清既定的UP原则- -最佳做法指导标准的目的。为了克服上述障碍,UP信息应:•在销售点以一致、突出和易读的方式呈现给所有零售商。这可以通过统一的最佳做法指南以及可能规定的规定和列报准则来实现;•UP的视觉呈现应该需要消费者非常有限的认知努力-它应该直观地易于使用;•UP信息应清楚地标记为与主要销售价格不同,以避免消费者之间的任何潜在混淆;•UP演示应结合标签和信息处理的最佳实践,包括使用字体类型,大小,高度,颜色,口头标志(“单价”字样),以及与主要销售价格明确划分的价格标签上一致和突出的位置。第2部分-关于UP规定的具体建议UP规定的一致性:•从消费者学习和采用的角度来看,零售商越一致地提供UP信息(在显示、使用的度量单位和涵盖的产品方面),消费者就越容易学习和采用UP。规定的一致性也可能促进消费者教育和缩短采用时间。•强制性UP计划应伴随着旨在实现零售商内部和零售商之间UP规定的高度一致性的要求。•在自愿提供的情况下,提供高水平的一致性可能会因提供最佳做法指南而得到促进。这也可以使零售商更容易自愿采用UP规定,特别是中小型零售商,他们可能没有专门的人员来决定如何提供UP。UP的可视化表示- UP表示的以下元素影响消费者查找、注意和使用UP信息的容易程度:•显示字体高度(较大)以方便UP的使用。但是,应注意不要与销售价格混淆;价格标签上的颜色突出,空白空间或分隔符也可用于将UP信息与价格标签的其余部分分开,从而为UP创建专用空间;•将UP信息定位在价格标签的显著位置可以提高其使用效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信