Bodily anxieties in enlightenment sex literature

J. Peakman
{"title":"Bodily anxieties in enlightenment sex literature","authors":"J. Peakman","doi":"10.5040/9781474226479.ch-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional beliefs about the early modern body were based on ancient theories which expounded a humoral system; this humoral body needed regulated discharges of fluids in order to maintain a healthy equilibrium. These views were still circulating in Enlightenment sex advice literature. With the development of new medical opinion, fresh attempts were made to 'civilise' the body through the control of bodily fluids, with masturbation seen as being particularly unhealthy. Often in opposition to these new 'scientific' promulgations, erotica would stand as an expression of popular concern about the body which expressed disbelief in dominant medical opinion while retaining acceptance of some of the older theories. Moral anxieties about the body were raised in erotica through the investigation of body parts and bodily fluids in the themes of sexual initiation, blood and ejaculation (both male and female). All these discussions on bodily fluids -circulating in the Enlightenment (traditional views on the body, new medical opinion and erotica) expressed gendered notions about bodily fluids, including blood; male fluids were seen as 'precious', but female fluids were, on the other hand, dispensable.","PeriodicalId":341308,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century Norwich","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century Norwich","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474226479.ch-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Traditional beliefs about the early modern body were based on ancient theories which expounded a humoral system; this humoral body needed regulated discharges of fluids in order to maintain a healthy equilibrium. These views were still circulating in Enlightenment sex advice literature. With the development of new medical opinion, fresh attempts were made to 'civilise' the body through the control of bodily fluids, with masturbation seen as being particularly unhealthy. Often in opposition to these new 'scientific' promulgations, erotica would stand as an expression of popular concern about the body which expressed disbelief in dominant medical opinion while retaining acceptance of some of the older theories. Moral anxieties about the body were raised in erotica through the investigation of body parts and bodily fluids in the themes of sexual initiation, blood and ejaculation (both male and female). All these discussions on bodily fluids -circulating in the Enlightenment (traditional views on the body, new medical opinion and erotica) expressed gendered notions about bodily fluids, including blood; male fluids were seen as 'precious', but female fluids were, on the other hand, dispensable.
启蒙性文学中的身体焦虑
关于早期现代人身体的传统信仰是建立在阐述体液系统的古代理论基础上的;这种体液体需要有规律地排出液体,以维持健康的平衡。这些观点仍然在启蒙运动时期的性建议文献中流传。随着新的医学观点的发展,人们试图通过控制体液来“教化”身体,而手淫被认为是特别不健康的。通常在反对这些新的“科学”的颁布,情色文学将作为一种表达大众对身体的关注,表达对主流医学观点的怀疑,同时保留对一些旧理论的接受。在色情作品中,通过对身体部位和体液的调查,提出了对身体的道德焦虑,这些身体部位和体液以性开始、血液和射精(男性和女性)为主题。所有这些关于在启蒙运动中流传的体液的讨论(关于身体的传统观点,新的医学观点和色情)都表达了关于体液(包括血液)的性别观念;男性体液被视为"宝贵的",而女性体液则是可有可无的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信