First results on flight rules and conflict avoidance maneuvers for a sectorless ATM concept

B. Birkmeier, C. Edinger, S. Tittel, B. Korn, D. Kugler
{"title":"First results on flight rules and conflict avoidance maneuvers for a sectorless ATM concept","authors":"B. Birkmeier, C. Edinger, S. Tittel, B. Korn, D. Kugler","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of sectorless ATM (Air Traffic Management) envisages the airspace as a whole instead of dividing it into sectors. The dismissal of sectors, however, necessitates the definition of a complete and unambiguous set of flight rules in order to regulate which aircraft has to introduce an avoidance maneuver in case of a conflict. This paper describes the research on flight rules conducted within DLR's research project on sectorless ATM and describes the developed rule set in detail. Since in a sectorless concept only one specified aircraft amongst the ones in conflict is responsible for the conflict resolution different kinds of avoidance maneuvers than nowadays are necessary. This paper specifies the avoidance maneuvers that have been developed for automatic conflict resolution by DLR's traffic simulator. In particular, vertical conflict resolution often combines horizontal and vertical avoidance to allow for inaccuracies of the vertical movement and trajectory prediction. The conflict resolutions are also offered as suggestions to the controller, who can either choose one of them or develop his or her own solution. It is debated why for short and medium-term conflict resolutions the automatically generated solutions might seem more sensible or efficient than for long-term conflict resolutions. It is explained that in long-term situations the system can be able to analyze situations more thoroughly than the controller. The discussion elaborates on possibilities to implement and apply these findings in a sectorless ATM concept.","PeriodicalId":263977,"journal":{"name":"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The idea of sectorless ATM (Air Traffic Management) envisages the airspace as a whole instead of dividing it into sectors. The dismissal of sectors, however, necessitates the definition of a complete and unambiguous set of flight rules in order to regulate which aircraft has to introduce an avoidance maneuver in case of a conflict. This paper describes the research on flight rules conducted within DLR's research project on sectorless ATM and describes the developed rule set in detail. Since in a sectorless concept only one specified aircraft amongst the ones in conflict is responsible for the conflict resolution different kinds of avoidance maneuvers than nowadays are necessary. This paper specifies the avoidance maneuvers that have been developed for automatic conflict resolution by DLR's traffic simulator. In particular, vertical conflict resolution often combines horizontal and vertical avoidance to allow for inaccuracies of the vertical movement and trajectory prediction. The conflict resolutions are also offered as suggestions to the controller, who can either choose one of them or develop his or her own solution. It is debated why for short and medium-term conflict resolutions the automatically generated solutions might seem more sensible or efficient than for long-term conflict resolutions. It is explained that in long-term situations the system can be able to analyze situations more thoroughly than the controller. The discussion elaborates on possibilities to implement and apply these findings in a sectorless ATM concept.
无扇区ATM概念的飞行规则和冲突避免机动的初步结果
无扇区空中交通管理(ATM)的想法将空域视为一个整体,而不是将其划分为扇区。然而,要取消扇区,就必须定义一套完整而明确的飞行规则,以规范哪些飞机在发生冲突时必须采用规避机动。本文介绍了在DLR无扇区ATM研究项目中对飞行规则的研究,并对所开发的规则集进行了详细的描述。由于在无扇区概念中,在冲突的飞机中只有一架指定的飞机负责解决冲突,因此与现在相比,需要不同种类的规避机动。本文详细介绍了利用DLR交通模拟器实现自动冲突解决的避撞机动。特别是,垂直冲突解决通常结合了水平和垂直回避,以允许垂直运动和轨迹预测的不准确性。冲突解决方案也作为建议提供给控制者,控制者可以选择其中之一,也可以制定自己的解决方案。人们争论为什么对于短期和中期的冲突解决,自动产生的解决办法似乎比长期的冲突解决办法更明智或更有效。它解释说,在长期的情况下,系统可以比控制器更彻底地分析情况。讨论详细阐述了在无部门ATM概念中实现和应用这些发现的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信