Vocal Fold Medialization Procedures for 30 Cases of Glottic Insufficiency: Our Experience

V. Khattar, V. Khattar, S. Gala
{"title":"Vocal Fold Medialization Procedures for 30 Cases of Glottic Insufficiency: Our Experience","authors":"V. Khattar, V. Khattar, S. Gala","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Glottic insufficiency which is inability to obtain complete vocal fold approximation during phonation is a common cause for dysphonia. Vocal fold immobility, vocal fold sulcus, presbylaryngis, vocal fold scarring are common causes. Materials and methods: We have studied 30 cases of glottic insufficiency that failed conservative management and underwent surgical intervention. Voice parameters like maximal phonation time (MPT) and voice handicap index (VHI) have been used as assessment parameters along with laryngoscopic examination. Observations and results: Twenty-one cases had vocal fold immobility, while the rest had vocal sulcus (7), vocal fold atrophy (1), vocal fold scarring (1) as the cause. All cases presented with voice change with few having symptoms of aspiration. Patients were subjected to either vocal fold injection or medialization thyroplasty depending on the etiology and severity, and the outcomes assessed. Majority of our cases showed good amount of improvement on videolaryngoscopy and voice analysis (MPT, VHI scores). Mean MPT scores improved from 7.57 seconds (pre-operative) to 18.83 seconds (final post-operative) and VHI scores changed from a mean of 49.6 to 26.57. Few had post operative problems like vocal fold oedema, under correction, implant malposition. Four patients needed revision procedures due to suboptimal results. Conclusion: Selection of the most suitable procedure for each patient, meticulous and precise technique and adequate follow up will promise best results and minimize complications and undesired results in patients of glottic insufficiency.","PeriodicalId":258448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10023-1157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Glottic insufficiency which is inability to obtain complete vocal fold approximation during phonation is a common cause for dysphonia. Vocal fold immobility, vocal fold sulcus, presbylaryngis, vocal fold scarring are common causes. Materials and methods: We have studied 30 cases of glottic insufficiency that failed conservative management and underwent surgical intervention. Voice parameters like maximal phonation time (MPT) and voice handicap index (VHI) have been used as assessment parameters along with laryngoscopic examination. Observations and results: Twenty-one cases had vocal fold immobility, while the rest had vocal sulcus (7), vocal fold atrophy (1), vocal fold scarring (1) as the cause. All cases presented with voice change with few having symptoms of aspiration. Patients were subjected to either vocal fold injection or medialization thyroplasty depending on the etiology and severity, and the outcomes assessed. Majority of our cases showed good amount of improvement on videolaryngoscopy and voice analysis (MPT, VHI scores). Mean MPT scores improved from 7.57 seconds (pre-operative) to 18.83 seconds (final post-operative) and VHI scores changed from a mean of 49.6 to 26.57. Few had post operative problems like vocal fold oedema, under correction, implant malposition. Four patients needed revision procedures due to suboptimal results. Conclusion: Selection of the most suitable procedure for each patient, meticulous and precise technique and adequate follow up will promise best results and minimize complications and undesired results in patients of glottic insufficiency.
30例声门不全的声带中间化治疗经验
声门功能不全,即在发声过程中无法获得完整的声带近似,是发音困难的常见原因。声带不动,声带沟,喉老,声带瘢痕是常见的原因。材料与方法:我们对30例声门功能不全保守治疗失败而行手术治疗的病例进行了研究。最大发声时间(MPT)和语音障碍指数(VHI)等语音参数已被用作喉镜检查的评估参数。观察与结果:声带不动21例,其余为声带沟7例,声带萎缩1例,声带瘢痕1例。所有病例均表现为声音改变,少数有误吸症状。根据病因和严重程度,对患者进行声带注射或中间化甲状腺成形术,并对结果进行评估。我们的大多数病例在视频喉镜检查和声音分析(MPT, VHI评分)方面表现出良好的改善。平均MPT评分从术前的7.57秒提高到术后的18.83秒,VHI评分从49.6秒提高到26.57秒。术后声带水肿、矫正不足、种植体错位等问题较少。4例患者因治疗结果不理想而需要翻修手术。结论:对于声门不全患者,选择最适合的手术方式、细致精确的技术和充分的随访可以保证最佳的治疗效果,最大限度地减少并发症和不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信