The Entrepreneur’s Dilemma of Ethics versus Professional Acceptability with Online Reputation Management Systems

D. Kuratko, Travis J. Brown, Marcus Wadell
{"title":"The Entrepreneur’s Dilemma of Ethics versus Professional Acceptability with Online Reputation Management Systems","authors":"D. Kuratko, Travis J. Brown, Marcus Wadell","doi":"10.1108/S1048-473620150000025002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In e-commerce, consumers have begun to rely on the opinions of fellow consumers who posted through online consumer reviews to a reputation management system. An ethical concern has arisen in the use and abuse of these new systems. We examine the underlying ethical issues that entrepreneurs are confronting in this time of surging e-commerce. Using 32 vignettes, one for each cross-section of our research construct framework, followed by two Likert scales for respondents to indicate their agreement with the action described from both the perspective of ethicality and professional acceptability, we received responses for 1,252 vignettes, which generated a dataset of 2,504 data points. The results of our pilot study suggest that the ethical considerations for business professionals conducting business online are more nuanced and complex than conventional wisdom on the subject might suggest. While 60 research subjects are small, the use of paired vignettes in our survey allowed us to measure at least 1,000 paired responses for each research construct. The results have the potential of revealing how young professionals have been conditioned by the prevalence of web-based interactions and the anonymity they afford participants, as well as the degree to which they rationalize the misrepresentation of information by business professionals for the purpose of manipulating consumers’ purchasing decisions in order to drive sales. If consumers’ trust in reputation management systems erodes, the result could be a collapse of the entire system as a meaningful source of information. We also demonstrate the tolerance of what is deemed ethical versus professionally acceptable with online business practices.","PeriodicalId":108758,"journal":{"name":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-473620150000025002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In e-commerce, consumers have begun to rely on the opinions of fellow consumers who posted through online consumer reviews to a reputation management system. An ethical concern has arisen in the use and abuse of these new systems. We examine the underlying ethical issues that entrepreneurs are confronting in this time of surging e-commerce. Using 32 vignettes, one for each cross-section of our research construct framework, followed by two Likert scales for respondents to indicate their agreement with the action described from both the perspective of ethicality and professional acceptability, we received responses for 1,252 vignettes, which generated a dataset of 2,504 data points. The results of our pilot study suggest that the ethical considerations for business professionals conducting business online are more nuanced and complex than conventional wisdom on the subject might suggest. While 60 research subjects are small, the use of paired vignettes in our survey allowed us to measure at least 1,000 paired responses for each research construct. The results have the potential of revealing how young professionals have been conditioned by the prevalence of web-based interactions and the anonymity they afford participants, as well as the degree to which they rationalize the misrepresentation of information by business professionals for the purpose of manipulating consumers’ purchasing decisions in order to drive sales. If consumers’ trust in reputation management systems erodes, the result could be a collapse of the entire system as a meaningful source of information. We also demonstrate the tolerance of what is deemed ethical versus professionally acceptable with online business practices.
企业家的道德困境与职业可接受性与在线声誉管理系统
在电子商务中,消费者已经开始依赖其他消费者通过在线消费者评论发布到信誉管理系统的意见。在这些新系统的使用和滥用中出现了道德问题。我们研究了企业家在这个电子商务蓬勃发展的时代所面临的潜在道德问题。使用32个小插曲,每个小插曲对应我们的研究构建框架的横截面,然后是两个李克特量表,用于受访者表明他们从道德和专业可接受性的角度对所描述的行动的同意,我们收到了1,252个小插曲的回应,产生了2,504个数据点的数据集。我们的初步研究结果表明,商业专业人士在网上开展业务时所考虑的道德因素比传统观点所认为的更为微妙和复杂。虽然60个研究对象很小,但在我们的调查中使用配对小片段使我们能够为每个研究结构测量至少1000个配对反应。研究结果有可能揭示年轻的专业人士是如何被网络互动的盛行所制约的,以及他们为参与者提供的匿名性,以及他们在多大程度上合理化了商业专业人士为了操纵消费者的购买决策而歪曲信息的程度,以推动销售。如果消费者对信誉管理系统的信任受到侵蚀,其结果可能是整个系统作为有意义的信息来源的崩溃。我们还展示了在线商业实践中被认为是道德的和专业的可接受的容忍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信