A Somewhat Wilder Grace: Hawthorne, Humboldt, and Withstanding the Collapse of Nature into Symbol in The House of the Seven Gables

Evan Manzanetti
{"title":"A Somewhat Wilder Grace: Hawthorne, Humboldt, and Withstanding the Collapse of Nature into Symbol in The House of the Seven Gables","authors":"Evan Manzanetti","doi":"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The first members of the Pyncheon family Nathaniel Hawthorne names in The House of the Seven Gables include no humans, but “the old Pyncheon-house” and “the Pyncheon-elm” (5). I argue that Hawthorne’s representation of nature produces a cultural–natural place-sense in which environment acts both as cultural symbol and endemic nature separate from human conceptions. By reading Hawthorne via Lawrence Buell’s “place-sense,” I argue for doubled existences of Hawthorne’s environment and position Hawthorne in dialogue with Alexander von Humboldt. Hawthorne’s depiction of nature that displays the “external world and our ideas and feelings melt[ing] into each other” both demonstrates a Humboldtian response to a common division between pre reason and experience in natural philosophy up through the nineteenth-century and also resonates with Donna Haraway’s call for “ongoing multispecies stories and practices of becoming-with” that defy preexisting anthropocentric models (Humboldt 1:64; Trouble 55). This consideration of Hawthorne alongside Humboldt invites interplay between nineteenth-century American literature and nascent nineteenth-century ecological philosophies, reading both in a cultural–natural framework engaging across multiple disciplines and foregrounds the opportunities to reexamine representations of nature in American literature considering nature’s difference from and dependence upon cultural conceptions.","PeriodicalId":261601,"journal":{"name":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The first members of the Pyncheon family Nathaniel Hawthorne names in The House of the Seven Gables include no humans, but “the old Pyncheon-house” and “the Pyncheon-elm” (5). I argue that Hawthorne’s representation of nature produces a cultural–natural place-sense in which environment acts both as cultural symbol and endemic nature separate from human conceptions. By reading Hawthorne via Lawrence Buell’s “place-sense,” I argue for doubled existences of Hawthorne’s environment and position Hawthorne in dialogue with Alexander von Humboldt. Hawthorne’s depiction of nature that displays the “external world and our ideas and feelings melt[ing] into each other” both demonstrates a Humboldtian response to a common division between pre reason and experience in natural philosophy up through the nineteenth-century and also resonates with Donna Haraway’s call for “ongoing multispecies stories and practices of becoming-with” that defy preexisting anthropocentric models (Humboldt 1:64; Trouble 55). This consideration of Hawthorne alongside Humboldt invites interplay between nineteenth-century American literature and nascent nineteenth-century ecological philosophies, reading both in a cultural–natural framework engaging across multiple disciplines and foregrounds the opportunities to reexamine representations of nature in American literature considering nature’s difference from and dependence upon cultural conceptions.
更狂野的优雅:霍桑、洪堡与《七面山墙之屋》中对自然崩塌的抗拒
《七座山墙之屋》中的第一个品钦家族成员纳撒尼尔·霍桑(Nathaniel Hawthorne)的名字不包括人类,而是“品钦老房子”和“品钦榆树”(5)。我认为,霍桑对自然的描绘产生了一种文化自然的场所感,在这种场所感中,环境既是文化符号,也是与人类概念分离的地方性自然。通过劳伦斯·布尔的“场所感”来阅读霍桑,我论证了霍桑环境的双重存在,并将霍桑置于与亚历山大·冯·洪堡的对话中。霍桑对自然的描述显示了“外部世界和我们的思想和情感相互融合”,这既表明了洪堡式的对19世纪自然哲学中前理性和经验之间的共同划分的回应,也与唐娜·哈拉威(Donna Haraway)的呼吁产生了共鸣,即“正在进行的多物种故事和实践”,这违背了先前存在的人类中心主义模型(洪堡1:64;麻烦55)。这种对霍桑和洪堡的思考邀请了19世纪美国文学和19世纪新生生态哲学之间的相互作用,在跨学科的文化-自然框架中阅读,并为重新审视美国文学中自然的表现提供了机会,考虑到自然与文化概念的差异和依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信