Automated Classification of Discrete Human Thoughts Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Comparison between Voxel-Based and Atlas-Based Feature Selection Methods

Jong-Hwan Lee, Junghoe Kim
{"title":"Automated Classification of Discrete Human Thoughts Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Comparison between Voxel-Based and Atlas-Based Feature Selection Methods","authors":"Jong-Hwan Lee, Junghoe Kim","doi":"10.1109/PRNI.2011.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been reported that human thoughts processes of sensory-motor functions as well as high level of cognitive processes may be highly reproducible between multiple trials as measured via functional MRI data. This trend of the reproducibility seems consistent between multiple subjects as well. We have also presented in our earlier study that six distinct thought processes were shown highly consistent spatial patterns of activations as evaluated from automated classification performance. In the present study, this automated classification performance was compared depending on the feature vector selection methods. A general linear model (GLM) was adopted to define a neuronal activity and voxel-based or atlas-based approaches were adopted as feature vector selection methods. The classification results showed superior performance from the voxel-based feature selection method than the atlas-based method. Nonetheless, when multiple atlases were used to defined feature vector elements, the resulting performance was comparable to that of the voxel-based method with greatly reduced computational time.","PeriodicalId":196419,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2011.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It has been reported that human thoughts processes of sensory-motor functions as well as high level of cognitive processes may be highly reproducible between multiple trials as measured via functional MRI data. This trend of the reproducibility seems consistent between multiple subjects as well. We have also presented in our earlier study that six distinct thought processes were shown highly consistent spatial patterns of activations as evaluated from automated classification performance. In the present study, this automated classification performance was compared depending on the feature vector selection methods. A general linear model (GLM) was adopted to define a neuronal activity and voxel-based or atlas-based approaches were adopted as feature vector selection methods. The classification results showed superior performance from the voxel-based feature selection method than the atlas-based method. Nonetheless, when multiple atlases were used to defined feature vector elements, the resulting performance was comparable to that of the voxel-based method with greatly reduced computational time.
使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的离散人类思想的自动分类:基于体素和基于阿特拉斯的特征选择方法的比较
据报道,人类的感觉-运动功能的思维过程以及高水平的认知过程可以在多个试验之间高度重复,通过功能性MRI数据测量。这种可重复性的趋势似乎在多个受试者之间也是一致的。在我们早期的研究中,我们也提出了六种不同的思维过程在自动分类性能的评估中显示出高度一致的空间激活模式。在本研究中,比较了基于特征向量选择方法的自动分类性能。采用一般线性模型(GLM)定义神经元活动,并采用基于体素或基于图集的方法作为特征向量选择方法。分类结果表明,基于体素的特征选择方法优于基于图集的分类方法。然而,当使用多个地图集来定义特征向量元素时,所得到的性能与基于体素的方法相当,并且大大减少了计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信