Synchronous Consensus with Mortal Byzantines

Josef Widder, G. Gridling, Bettina Weiss, J. Blanquart
{"title":"Synchronous Consensus with Mortal Byzantines","authors":"Josef Widder, G. Gridling, Bettina Weiss, J. Blanquart","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2007.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of reaching agreement in synchronous systems under a fault model whose severity lies between Byzantine and crash faults. For these \"mortal\" Byzantine faults, we assume that faulty processes take a finite number of arbitrary steps before they eventually crash. After discussing several application examples where this model is justified, we present and prove correct a consensus algorithm that tolerates a minority of faulty processes; i.e., more faults can be tolerated compared to classic Byzantine faults. We also show that the algorithm is optimal regarding the required number of processes and that no algorithm can solve consensus with just a majority of correct processes in a bounded number of rounds under our fault assumption. Finally, we consider more restricted fault models that allow to further reduce the required number of processes.","PeriodicalId":405751,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2007.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

We consider the problem of reaching agreement in synchronous systems under a fault model whose severity lies between Byzantine and crash faults. For these "mortal" Byzantine faults, we assume that faulty processes take a finite number of arbitrary steps before they eventually crash. After discussing several application examples where this model is justified, we present and prove correct a consensus algorithm that tolerates a minority of faulty processes; i.e., more faults can be tolerated compared to classic Byzantine faults. We also show that the algorithm is optimal regarding the required number of processes and that no algorithm can solve consensus with just a majority of correct processes in a bounded number of rounds under our fault assumption. Finally, we consider more restricted fault models that allow to further reduce the required number of processes.
与凡人拜占庭人的同步共识
考虑了在拜占庭故障和崩溃故障之间的故障模型下同步系统的一致性问题。对于这些“致命的”拜占庭式错误,我们假设有缺陷的进程在最终崩溃之前采取有限数量的任意步骤。在讨论了该模型合理的几个应用示例之后,我们提出并证明了一个容忍少数错误过程的共识算法是正确的;也就是说,与经典的拜占庭式故障相比,可以容忍更多的故障。我们还证明了该算法对于所需的进程数量是最优的,并且在我们的错误假设下,没有算法可以在有限的轮数中仅使用大多数正确的进程来解决共识。最后,我们考虑更多的限制故障模型,允许进一步减少所需的过程数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信