A comparison of TCP-friendly congestion control protocols

Surekha Biyani, James J. Martin
{"title":"A comparison of TCP-friendly congestion control protocols","authors":"Surekha Biyani, James J. Martin","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the ns simulator, we perform a detailed study of the fairness and the smoothness properties of SimdNR, an enhanced version of SIMD. Our study includes TFRC and TCP congestion control protocols in both steady-state and highly dynamic network conditions through RED and DropTail routers. Our results show that SimdNR is fair to TCP through RED routers in steady-state scenario. But, SimdNR is not fair to TCP over drop tail routers. Also our results show that SimdNR demonstrates less smoothness than TFRC in steady-state scenario and superior smoothness than TFRC in dynamic network conditions","PeriodicalId":229045,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Using the ns simulator, we perform a detailed study of the fairness and the smoothness properties of SimdNR, an enhanced version of SIMD. Our study includes TFRC and TCP congestion control protocols in both steady-state and highly dynamic network conditions through RED and DropTail routers. Our results show that SimdNR is fair to TCP through RED routers in steady-state scenario. But, SimdNR is not fair to TCP over drop tail routers. Also our results show that SimdNR demonstrates less smoothness than TFRC in steady-state scenario and superior smoothness than TFRC in dynamic network conditions
tcp友好型拥塞控制协议的比较
利用ns模拟器对SimdNR (SIMD的增强版本)的公平性和平滑性进行了详细研究。我们的研究包括通过RED和DropTail路由器在稳态和高动态网络条件下的TFRC和TCP拥塞控制协议。结果表明,在稳态情况下,SimdNR通过RED路由器对TCP是公平的。但是,SimdNR对TCP在丢尾路由器上是不公平的。结果表明,SimdNR在稳态情况下的平滑性低于TFRC,而在动态网络条件下的平滑性优于TFRC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信