{"title":"The Impact of Adding a Labyrinth Surface to an Optimal Helical Seal Design","authors":"W. Paudel, Cori Watson, H. Wood","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-contacting annular seals are used in rotating machinery to reduce the flow of working fluid across a pressure differential. Helical and labyrinth grooved seals are two types of non-contacting annular seals frequently used between the impeller stages in a pump and at the balance drum. Labyrinth seals have circumferential grooves cut into the surface of the rotor, the stator, or both. They function to reduce leakage by dissipating kinetic energy as fluid expands in the grooves and then is forced to contract in the jet stream region. Helical groove seals have continuously cut grooves on either or both the rotor and stator surfaces. Like labyrinth seals, they reduce leakage through dissipation of kinetic energy, but have the added mechanism of functioning as a pump to push the fluid back towards the high-pressure region. Previous work has shown that mixed helical-labyrinth seals with labyrinth grooves on stator and helical grooves on rotor or labyrinth grooves on rotor and helical grooves on stator have an approximately 45% lower leakage than an optimized helical groove seal with grooves just on the stator in a high pressure application. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the same performance gains can also be achieved in a low pressure application. Simulations were run in ANSYS CFX for seal designs with a helical stator and labyrinth rotor. Several labyrinth design parameters including the number of grooves and the groove width and depth are varied while the helical variables such as the groove width and depth as well as helix angle are kept constant. The data obtained are analyzed using backward regression methods and various response plots to determine the relationship between the design parameters and mass flow and power loss. The optimized helical design was simulated and the axial pressure profiles of the designs were compared to analyze the mechanism of the mixed helical-labyrinth seal. Then, the same labyrinth seal designs were simulated for a labyrinth rotor and a smooth stator to determine whether the optimal number of grooves, groove width and groove depth change due to the helical stator. The findings of this study show the effectiveness of mixed helical labyrinth grooved seals for both low and high pressure cases, and thus their efficiency and reliability for numerous industrial applications.","PeriodicalId":229616,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Non-contacting annular seals are used in rotating machinery to reduce the flow of working fluid across a pressure differential. Helical and labyrinth grooved seals are two types of non-contacting annular seals frequently used between the impeller stages in a pump and at the balance drum. Labyrinth seals have circumferential grooves cut into the surface of the rotor, the stator, or both. They function to reduce leakage by dissipating kinetic energy as fluid expands in the grooves and then is forced to contract in the jet stream region. Helical groove seals have continuously cut grooves on either or both the rotor and stator surfaces. Like labyrinth seals, they reduce leakage through dissipation of kinetic energy, but have the added mechanism of functioning as a pump to push the fluid back towards the high-pressure region. Previous work has shown that mixed helical-labyrinth seals with labyrinth grooves on stator and helical grooves on rotor or labyrinth grooves on rotor and helical grooves on stator have an approximately 45% lower leakage than an optimized helical groove seal with grooves just on the stator in a high pressure application. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the same performance gains can also be achieved in a low pressure application. Simulations were run in ANSYS CFX for seal designs with a helical stator and labyrinth rotor. Several labyrinth design parameters including the number of grooves and the groove width and depth are varied while the helical variables such as the groove width and depth as well as helix angle are kept constant. The data obtained are analyzed using backward regression methods and various response plots to determine the relationship between the design parameters and mass flow and power loss. The optimized helical design was simulated and the axial pressure profiles of the designs were compared to analyze the mechanism of the mixed helical-labyrinth seal. Then, the same labyrinth seal designs were simulated for a labyrinth rotor and a smooth stator to determine whether the optimal number of grooves, groove width and groove depth change due to the helical stator. The findings of this study show the effectiveness of mixed helical labyrinth grooved seals for both low and high pressure cases, and thus their efficiency and reliability for numerous industrial applications.