The Impact of Adding a Labyrinth Surface to an Optimal Helical Seal Design

W. Paudel, Cori Watson, H. Wood
{"title":"The Impact of Adding a Labyrinth Surface to an Optimal Helical Seal Design","authors":"W. Paudel, Cori Watson, H. Wood","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-contacting annular seals are used in rotating machinery to reduce the flow of working fluid across a pressure differential. Helical and labyrinth grooved seals are two types of non-contacting annular seals frequently used between the impeller stages in a pump and at the balance drum. Labyrinth seals have circumferential grooves cut into the surface of the rotor, the stator, or both. They function to reduce leakage by dissipating kinetic energy as fluid expands in the grooves and then is forced to contract in the jet stream region. Helical groove seals have continuously cut grooves on either or both the rotor and stator surfaces. Like labyrinth seals, they reduce leakage through dissipation of kinetic energy, but have the added mechanism of functioning as a pump to push the fluid back towards the high-pressure region. Previous work has shown that mixed helical-labyrinth seals with labyrinth grooves on stator and helical grooves on rotor or labyrinth grooves on rotor and helical grooves on stator have an approximately 45% lower leakage than an optimized helical groove seal with grooves just on the stator in a high pressure application. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the same performance gains can also be achieved in a low pressure application. Simulations were run in ANSYS CFX for seal designs with a helical stator and labyrinth rotor. Several labyrinth design parameters including the number of grooves and the groove width and depth are varied while the helical variables such as the groove width and depth as well as helix angle are kept constant. The data obtained are analyzed using backward regression methods and various response plots to determine the relationship between the design parameters and mass flow and power loss. The optimized helical design was simulated and the axial pressure profiles of the designs were compared to analyze the mechanism of the mixed helical-labyrinth seal. Then, the same labyrinth seal designs were simulated for a labyrinth rotor and a smooth stator to determine whether the optimal number of grooves, groove width and groove depth change due to the helical stator. The findings of this study show the effectiveness of mixed helical labyrinth grooved seals for both low and high pressure cases, and thus their efficiency and reliability for numerous industrial applications.","PeriodicalId":229616,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Non-contacting annular seals are used in rotating machinery to reduce the flow of working fluid across a pressure differential. Helical and labyrinth grooved seals are two types of non-contacting annular seals frequently used between the impeller stages in a pump and at the balance drum. Labyrinth seals have circumferential grooves cut into the surface of the rotor, the stator, or both. They function to reduce leakage by dissipating kinetic energy as fluid expands in the grooves and then is forced to contract in the jet stream region. Helical groove seals have continuously cut grooves on either or both the rotor and stator surfaces. Like labyrinth seals, they reduce leakage through dissipation of kinetic energy, but have the added mechanism of functioning as a pump to push the fluid back towards the high-pressure region. Previous work has shown that mixed helical-labyrinth seals with labyrinth grooves on stator and helical grooves on rotor or labyrinth grooves on rotor and helical grooves on stator have an approximately 45% lower leakage than an optimized helical groove seal with grooves just on the stator in a high pressure application. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the same performance gains can also be achieved in a low pressure application. Simulations were run in ANSYS CFX for seal designs with a helical stator and labyrinth rotor. Several labyrinth design parameters including the number of grooves and the groove width and depth are varied while the helical variables such as the groove width and depth as well as helix angle are kept constant. The data obtained are analyzed using backward regression methods and various response plots to determine the relationship between the design parameters and mass flow and power loss. The optimized helical design was simulated and the axial pressure profiles of the designs were compared to analyze the mechanism of the mixed helical-labyrinth seal. Then, the same labyrinth seal designs were simulated for a labyrinth rotor and a smooth stator to determine whether the optimal number of grooves, groove width and groove depth change due to the helical stator. The findings of this study show the effectiveness of mixed helical labyrinth grooved seals for both low and high pressure cases, and thus their efficiency and reliability for numerous industrial applications.
添加迷宫面对优化螺旋密封设计的影响
非接触式环空密封用于旋转机械,以减少工作流体在压差上的流动。螺旋槽密封和迷宫槽密封是两种非接触式环形密封,常用于泵的叶轮级之间和平衡鼓处。迷宫式密封在转子、定子或两者的表面上都有环形凹槽。它们的作用是通过耗散动能来减少泄漏,因为流体在沟槽中膨胀,然后在急流区域被迫收缩。螺旋槽密封在转子和定子的一个或两个表面上有连续的切槽。像迷宫式密封一样,它们通过耗散动能来减少泄漏,但附加了泵的作用机制,将流体推回高压区域。先前的工作表明,在高压应用中,与仅在定子上有槽的优化螺旋槽密封相比,在定子上有槽的螺旋槽和转子上有螺旋槽或转子上有迷宫槽和定子上有螺旋槽的混合螺旋-迷宫密封的泄漏量降低了约45%。本研究的主要目的是确定在低压应用中是否也能获得相同的性能增益。在ANSYS CFX中对螺旋定子和迷宫式转子的密封设计进行了仿真。槽数、槽宽、槽深等迷宫设计参数变化,而槽宽、槽深、螺旋角等螺旋参数保持不变。利用反向回归方法和各种响应图对所得数据进行分析,确定设计参数与质量流量和功率损失之间的关系。对优化后的螺旋设计进行了仿真,并对各设计的轴向压力分布进行了比较,分析了螺旋-迷宫混合密封的机理。然后,对相同的迷宫密封设计进行了迷宫转子和光滑定子的仿真,以确定螺旋定子是否会改变最优槽数、槽宽和槽深。该研究结果表明,混合螺旋迷宫沟槽密封在低压和高压情况下都是有效的,因此在许多工业应用中都是高效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信