{"title":"A First Button Done Up Wrongly: Revisiting Philip H. Stoddard’s “Ottoman Special Organization”","authors":"Polat Safi","doi":"10.1080/23296151.2021.1983943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Ottoman Special Organization made its way into the literature of historical studies during the 1960s in the United States through the work of Philip H. Stoddard. Stoddard’s doctoral dissertation resonated so powerfully within academic circles that his approach to the organization, albeit flawed, was adopted extensively and thus echoed by later researchers. This also holds true for Turkish academia, where the nature, origin and historical course of the Special Organization in particular, and unconventional warfare and intelligence in general, was and remains largely misunderstood due to Stoddard’s fallacious analysis of the organization coupled with the uncritical character of conventional history-writing in Turkey. Through a critique of the paradigms and referential points Stoddard based his study on, as well as the conceptual and terminological aspects of his work, this study offers a more sound approach to both the organization and the units that fulfilled intelligence duties at the institutional level.","PeriodicalId":276818,"journal":{"name":"Special Operations Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Operations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23296151.2021.1983943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Ottoman Special Organization made its way into the literature of historical studies during the 1960s in the United States through the work of Philip H. Stoddard. Stoddard’s doctoral dissertation resonated so powerfully within academic circles that his approach to the organization, albeit flawed, was adopted extensively and thus echoed by later researchers. This also holds true for Turkish academia, where the nature, origin and historical course of the Special Organization in particular, and unconventional warfare and intelligence in general, was and remains largely misunderstood due to Stoddard’s fallacious analysis of the organization coupled with the uncritical character of conventional history-writing in Turkey. Through a critique of the paradigms and referential points Stoddard based his study on, as well as the conceptual and terminological aspects of his work, this study offers a more sound approach to both the organization and the units that fulfilled intelligence duties at the institutional level.
20世纪60年代,通过菲利普·h·斯托达德(Philip H. Stoddard)的工作,奥斯曼特别组织进入了美国历史研究的文学领域。斯托达德的博士论文在学术界引起了强烈的共鸣,他对组织的研究方法尽管存在缺陷,但被广泛采用,并得到了后来研究人员的呼应。这也适用于土耳其学术界,由于斯托达德对该组织的错误分析,加上土耳其传统历史写作的不批判特征,土耳其学术界对特别组织的性质、起源和历史进程,尤其是非常规战争和情报,过去和现在都存在很大的误解。通过对Stoddard研究的范式和参考点的批判,以及他工作的概念和术语方面,本研究为在制度层面上履行情报职责的组织和单位提供了一种更合理的方法。