Automated Firearm Identification: On using a novel Multiple-Slice-Shape (MSS) Approach for Comparison and Matching of Firing Pin Impression Topography

R. Fischer, C. Vielhauer
{"title":"Automated Firearm Identification: On using a novel Multiple-Slice-Shape (MSS) Approach for Comparison and Matching of Firing Pin Impression Topography","authors":"R. Fischer, C. Vielhauer","doi":"10.1145/2756601.2756619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The examination of firearm related toolmarks impressed to cartridges and bullets is a well known forensic discipline. The application of three dimensional imaging systems and pattern recognition techniques for automatic comparison and matching of topographic data is a central field of research in the domain of digital crime scene analysis. In this work, we introduce and evaluate a novel Multiple-Slice-Shape (MSS) approach with the objective to closer link the preprocessing and feature extraction stages and improve the automated examinations of firearm toolmark surface data. We employ two existing features which are applied to the topography of firing pin impressions and aim at an automatic matching of the shapes based on multiple line-profile measurement. We suggest several modifications of the original Multiple-Angle-Path (MAP) and Multiple-Circle-Path (MCP) features to achieve an optimal integration into the proposed processing pipeline. Our evaluation approach is three-fold. First, we aim at the determination of an initial parameterization for MSS processing and feature extraction. Second, we evaluate the accuracy of discrimination for two firearms of the same mark and model. Third, we evaluate the accuracy using six different weapons. The test set contains 72 cartridge samples including six guns and three ammunition manufactures. Regarding the first evaluation, the results indicate an improvement of the accuracy for both features. Regarding the second evaluation, the achieved accuracy ranges between 67% and 100% for the MAP feature, and between 92% and 100% for the MCP feature. With respect to the third evaluation, the best result is achieved for MAP32 with 73% and for MCP15 with 92% compared to 56% and 82% correct classification rate regarding the original versions. It is supposed that various 3D spatial features can be combined and maybe improved by using the proposed MSS approach. We motivate the evaluation of this question for future work.","PeriodicalId":153680,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756601.2756619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The examination of firearm related toolmarks impressed to cartridges and bullets is a well known forensic discipline. The application of three dimensional imaging systems and pattern recognition techniques for automatic comparison and matching of topographic data is a central field of research in the domain of digital crime scene analysis. In this work, we introduce and evaluate a novel Multiple-Slice-Shape (MSS) approach with the objective to closer link the preprocessing and feature extraction stages and improve the automated examinations of firearm toolmark surface data. We employ two existing features which are applied to the topography of firing pin impressions and aim at an automatic matching of the shapes based on multiple line-profile measurement. We suggest several modifications of the original Multiple-Angle-Path (MAP) and Multiple-Circle-Path (MCP) features to achieve an optimal integration into the proposed processing pipeline. Our evaluation approach is three-fold. First, we aim at the determination of an initial parameterization for MSS processing and feature extraction. Second, we evaluate the accuracy of discrimination for two firearms of the same mark and model. Third, we evaluate the accuracy using six different weapons. The test set contains 72 cartridge samples including six guns and three ammunition manufactures. Regarding the first evaluation, the results indicate an improvement of the accuracy for both features. Regarding the second evaluation, the achieved accuracy ranges between 67% and 100% for the MAP feature, and between 92% and 100% for the MCP feature. With respect to the third evaluation, the best result is achieved for MAP32 with 73% and for MCP15 with 92% compared to 56% and 82% correct classification rate regarding the original versions. It is supposed that various 3D spatial features can be combined and maybe improved by using the proposed MSS approach. We motivate the evaluation of this question for future work.
枪械自动识别:利用一种新的多片形(MSS)方法对射针凹痕形貌进行比较和匹配
检查枪弹和子弹上留下的与火器有关的工具痕迹是一门众所周知的法医学科。应用三维成像系统和模式识别技术对地形数据进行自动比较和匹配是数字犯罪现场分析领域的研究热点。在这项工作中,我们介绍并评估了一种新的多片形状(MSS)方法,目的是将预处理和特征提取阶段更紧密地联系起来,并改进枪支工具标记表面数据的自动化检查。我们利用两个现有的特征,应用于击针印痕的地形,旨在实现基于多线轮廓测量的形状自动匹配。我们建议对原始的多角度路径(MAP)和多圆路径(MCP)特征进行一些修改,以实现与所提出的处理管道的最佳集成。我们的评估方法有三个方面。首先,我们的目标是确定用于MSS处理和特征提取的初始参数化。其次,对同一标号和型号的两种枪械的识别精度进行了评估。第三,我们使用六种不同的武器来评估精度。测试集包含72个弹药样本,包括6支枪和3家弹药制造商。对于第一次评估,结果表明两个特征的准确性都有所提高。对于第二次评估,MAP特征的准确率在67%到100%之间,MCP特征的准确率在92%到100%之间。在第三次评估中,MAP32和MCP15的正确分类率分别为73%和92%,而原始版本的正确分类率分别为56%和82%。利用该方法可以将各种三维空间特征组合在一起,并对其进行改进。我们鼓励在今后的工作中对这个问题进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信