Promising role for pleural vent in pneumothorax following CT-Guided biopsy of lung lesions.

M. Ball, S. Babu, A. Wallis, R. Asciak
{"title":"Promising role for pleural vent in pneumothorax following CT-Guided biopsy of lung lesions.","authors":"M. Ball, S. Babu, A. Wallis, R. Asciak","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20210965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate the safety, effectiveness and cost benefit of ambulatory pleural vent compared to conventional chest drain for pneumothorax following CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions (CTGB).\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively analysed electronic hospital records of patients requiring intervention for pneumothorax following CTGB. All patients treated with pleural vent over a 2 year period (August 2017 - July 2019) were included and compared to a control group of all patients treated with chest drain over a previous 2 year period (August 2014 - July 2016).\n\n\nRESULTS\nPatients managed with a pleural vent had a shorter length of hospital stay compared to the chest drain group (median 0 days vs 4.5 days, p < 0.01). The mean cost of follow-up in the pleural vent group was £530.36 per patient compared to a mean of £2699.38 per patient in the chest drain group (p value < 0.01).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPleural vent can be a safe and effective alternative to conventional chest drain for the management of CTGB-related pneumothorax which allows patients to be managed on an outpatient basis with reduced hospital stays and lower associated healthcare costs.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of pleural vent for CT guided biopsy-related pneumothorax.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety, effectiveness and cost benefit of ambulatory pleural vent compared to conventional chest drain for pneumothorax following CT-guided biopsy of lung lesions (CTGB). METHODS We retrospectively analysed electronic hospital records of patients requiring intervention for pneumothorax following CTGB. All patients treated with pleural vent over a 2 year period (August 2017 - July 2019) were included and compared to a control group of all patients treated with chest drain over a previous 2 year period (August 2014 - July 2016). RESULTS Patients managed with a pleural vent had a shorter length of hospital stay compared to the chest drain group (median 0 days vs 4.5 days, p < 0.01). The mean cost of follow-up in the pleural vent group was £530.36 per patient compared to a mean of £2699.38 per patient in the chest drain group (p value < 0.01). CONCLUSION Pleural vent can be a safe and effective alternative to conventional chest drain for the management of CTGB-related pneumothorax which allows patients to be managed on an outpatient basis with reduced hospital stays and lower associated healthcare costs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of pleural vent for CT guided biopsy-related pneumothorax.
胸膜通风口在气胸ct引导下肺组织活检中的应用前景。
目的评价ct引导下肺病变活检(CTGB)后动态胸腔放空与常规胸腔引流治疗气胸的安全性、有效性和成本效益。方法回顾性分析CTGB术后需要干预的气胸患者的电子病历。纳入所有在2年期间(2017年8月至2019年7月)接受胸腔引流的患者,并与前2年期间(2014年8月至2016年7月)接受胸腔引流的所有患者的对照组进行比较。结果胸腔引流组患者住院时间短于胸腔引流组(中位0天vs中位4.5天,p < 0.01)。胸膜通气组的平均随访费用为每位患者530.36英镑,而胸腔引流组的平均随访费用为每位患者2699.38英镑(p值< 0.01)。结论胸膜通气是一种安全有效的治疗ctgb相关性气胸的替代方法,可使患者在门诊进行治疗,减少住院时间,降低相关医疗费用。据我们所知,这是第一个证明胸膜通气治疗CT引导活检相关气胸的安全性和有效性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信