Cherchez la femme: Power and Female Agency in Bactriaat the dawn of the Hellenistic Age

M. Ferrario
{"title":"Cherchez la femme: Power and Female Agency in Bactriaat the dawn of the Hellenistic Age","authors":"M. Ferrario","doi":"10.5565/rev/karanos.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due prominently to the scanty nature of evidence on the ground attesting to an imperial presence which, however, historiographical sources claim to have been real and lasting over time, the satrapy of Bactria (roughly embracing northeastern Afghanistan, southern Uzbekistan and western Tajikistan) to this day still struggles to free itself of some prejudices, despite some extremely important discoveries and a more general scholarly reevaluation of previous conclusions. Possibly the most stubborn among these is the image of an ungovernable province, constantly on the brink of dynastic revolts (cf. Hdt. 9.113) or threatened by northern barbarians (against whom Cyrus found his end and whom Darius boasts of having subjected in the famous Bīsutūn inscription. With the recently published Aramaic Documents from Ancient Bactria, however, we have acquired an incredibly valuable source regarding the functioning of the satrapy at a crucial period in its history (the late 4th century BCE until the years immediately following Alexander). The present study is based primarily on the following: 1) this documentation, 2) the results of some recent and very significant studies on the Persepolis archive and 3) some methodological reflections on the relationship between empire and the local élite(s) suggested by the comparative analysis of the functioning of this relationship in a different phase of Central Asia’s imperial history (the 1930s). The study is intended, on the one hand, as a first step towards a new appreciation of the role Bactria and Sogdiana played in the delicate transitional phase from Achaemenid to Macedonian hegemony in the upper satrapies. On the other hand, it seeks to raise some hypotheses about the reasons behind the position held during the stormy years of Alexander’s Bactrian campaign and in the subsequent, no less troubled years by two protagonists of these crucial events, who are however still relatively unrecognized in their role as historical agents: the Bactrio-Sogdian princesses Roxane and Apama.","PeriodicalId":129714,"journal":{"name":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/karanos.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due prominently to the scanty nature of evidence on the ground attesting to an imperial presence which, however, historiographical sources claim to have been real and lasting over time, the satrapy of Bactria (roughly embracing northeastern Afghanistan, southern Uzbekistan and western Tajikistan) to this day still struggles to free itself of some prejudices, despite some extremely important discoveries and a more general scholarly reevaluation of previous conclusions. Possibly the most stubborn among these is the image of an ungovernable province, constantly on the brink of dynastic revolts (cf. Hdt. 9.113) or threatened by northern barbarians (against whom Cyrus found his end and whom Darius boasts of having subjected in the famous Bīsutūn inscription. With the recently published Aramaic Documents from Ancient Bactria, however, we have acquired an incredibly valuable source regarding the functioning of the satrapy at a crucial period in its history (the late 4th century BCE until the years immediately following Alexander). The present study is based primarily on the following: 1) this documentation, 2) the results of some recent and very significant studies on the Persepolis archive and 3) some methodological reflections on the relationship between empire and the local élite(s) suggested by the comparative analysis of the functioning of this relationship in a different phase of Central Asia’s imperial history (the 1930s). The study is intended, on the one hand, as a first step towards a new appreciation of the role Bactria and Sogdiana played in the delicate transitional phase from Achaemenid to Macedonian hegemony in the upper satrapies. On the other hand, it seeks to raise some hypotheses about the reasons behind the position held during the stormy years of Alexander’s Bactrian campaign and in the subsequent, no less troubled years by two protagonists of these crucial events, who are however still relatively unrecognized in their role as historical agents: the Bactrio-Sogdian princesses Roxane and Apama.
《女性之家:希腊化时代初期巴克特里亚的权力与女性能动性》
尽管有一些极其重要的发现和对先前结论的更广泛的学术重新评估,但由于证明帝国存在的地面证据的缺乏,然而,史学资料声称这是真实的,并且随着时间的推移而持续存在,大夏的总督(大致包括阿富汗东北部,乌兹别克斯坦南部和塔吉克斯坦西部)直到今天仍然在努力摆脱一些偏见。其中最顽固的可能是一个无法治理的省份的形象,不断处于王朝叛乱的边缘(参见《犹大书》9.113),或者受到北方蛮族的威胁(居鲁士最终打败了他们,大流士在著名的Bīsutūn铭文中吹嘘自己征服了他们)。然而,随着最近出版的来自古巴克特里亚的阿拉姆文献,我们获得了一个关于总督在其历史的关键时期(公元前4世纪晚期直到亚历山大之后的几年)运作的令人难以置信的宝贵资源。本研究主要基于以下内容:1)本文献,2)最近对波斯波利斯档案进行的一些非常重要的研究结果,以及3)对帝国与当地公民之间关系在中亚帝国历史的不同阶段(20世纪30年代)的功能进行比较分析所提出的一些方法论反思。一方面,这项研究的目的是,作为重新认识巴克特里亚和索格黛亚在从阿契美尼德到马其顿的上层总督霸权的微妙过渡阶段所扮演的角色的第一步。另一方面,它试图提出一些假设,关于在亚历山大的巴克特里亚战役的风暴年代和随后的动荡年代中,这些关键事件的两位主角所占据的位置背后的原因,然而,他们作为历史代理人的角色仍然相对不被认可:巴克特里亚-粟特公主罗克珊和阿帕玛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信