Weed Control and Glyphosate-tolerant Sugarbeet Response to Herbicide Treatments

A. Mesbah, Stephen D. Miller
{"title":"Weed Control and Glyphosate-tolerant Sugarbeet Response to Herbicide Treatments","authors":"A. Mesbah, Stephen D. Miller","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.41.3.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Wyoming locations, Powell and Torrington Research and Extension Centers, to evaluate weed control efficacy and glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeet response to glyphosate alone and in combination with residual herbicides. Weed control with a single glyphosate application was inadequate for all species except wild mustard. Two sequential applications starting at 2-, 4-, and 6-leaf sugarbeet with a two week interval between applications provided more than 90% weed control. Similar weed control was provided with three applications starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet with one or two week intervals between applications, respective­ ly. Residual herbicides followed by one or two applications of' glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet provided excel­ lent weed control. No sugarbeet injury was recorded with glyphosate alone. However, sugarbeet injury with treat­ ments containing residual herbicides ranged from 0 to 10%. With glyphosate alone, sugarbeet root yield increased as the number and frequency of applications increased. Highest yields were obtained with two or three applications of glyphosate starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet. Similar yields were obtained with residual herbicides in combina­ tion with one or two applications of glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet. None of the treatments, including the weedy check, affected sucrose content. Sucrose yield dif­ fered among treatments and corresponded to sugarbeet root yield. Additional Key Words: Ethofumesate, desmedipham, phenmedipham,","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.41.3.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Wyoming locations, Powell and Torrington Research and Extension Centers, to evaluate weed control efficacy and glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeet response to glyphosate alone and in combination with residual herbicides. Weed control with a single glyphosate application was inadequate for all species except wild mustard. Two sequential applications starting at 2-, 4-, and 6-leaf sugarbeet with a two week interval between applications provided more than 90% weed control. Similar weed control was provided with three applications starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet with one or two week intervals between applications, respective­ ly. Residual herbicides followed by one or two applications of' glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet provided excel­ lent weed control. No sugarbeet injury was recorded with glyphosate alone. However, sugarbeet injury with treat­ ments containing residual herbicides ranged from 0 to 10%. With glyphosate alone, sugarbeet root yield increased as the number and frequency of applications increased. Highest yields were obtained with two or three applications of glyphosate starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet. Similar yields were obtained with residual herbicides in combina­ tion with one or two applications of glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet. None of the treatments, including the weedy check, affected sucrose content. Sucrose yield dif­ fered among treatments and corresponded to sugarbeet root yield. Additional Key Words: Ethofumesate, desmedipham, phenmedipham,
杂草控制和耐草甘膦甜菜对除草剂处理的反应
1998年和1999年,在怀俄明州的Powell和Torrington研究和推广中心进行了田间试验,以评估杂草控制效果和耐草甘膦甜菜对草甘膦单独使用和与残留除草剂联合使用的反应。除野生芥菜外,单次施用草甘膦对所有品种的杂草控制都是不够的。从2叶、4叶和6叶甜菜开始连续两次施用,间隔两周,可防治90%以上的杂草。在2叶或4叶甜菜上施用3次类似的杂草防治,每次施用间隔1或2周。从四叶甜菜开始施用残留除草剂后,再施用一到两次草甘膦,取得了良好的杂草防治效果。单独使用草甘膦无甜菜损伤记录。然而,除草剂残留处理对甜菜的伤害在0 ~ 10%之间。单独使用草甘膦时,甜菜根产量随着施用次数和频率的增加而增加。从2叶或4叶甜菜开始施用草甘膦2或3次,产量最高。从四叶甜菜开始,使用残留除草剂与1或2次草甘膦联合施用可获得类似的产量。包括杂草检查在内的所有处理都没有影响蔗糖含量。不同处理的蔗糖产量不同,与甜菜根产量相对应。【关键词】乙硫马醋酯,地麦迪芬,苯麦迪芬,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信