{"title":"Weed Control and Glyphosate-tolerant Sugarbeet Response to Herbicide Treatments","authors":"A. Mesbah, Stephen D. Miller","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.41.3.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Wyoming locations, Powell and Torrington Research and Extension Centers, to evaluate weed control efficacy and glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeet response to glyphosate alone and in combination with residual herbicides. Weed control with a single glyphosate application was inadequate for all species except wild mustard. Two sequential applications starting at 2-, 4-, and 6-leaf sugarbeet with a two week interval between applications provided more than 90% weed control. Similar weed control was provided with three applications starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet with one or two week intervals between applications, respective ly. Residual herbicides followed by one or two applications of' glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet provided excel lent weed control. No sugarbeet injury was recorded with glyphosate alone. However, sugarbeet injury with treat ments containing residual herbicides ranged from 0 to 10%. With glyphosate alone, sugarbeet root yield increased as the number and frequency of applications increased. Highest yields were obtained with two or three applications of glyphosate starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet. Similar yields were obtained with residual herbicides in combina tion with one or two applications of glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet. None of the treatments, including the weedy check, affected sucrose content. Sucrose yield dif fered among treatments and corresponded to sugarbeet root yield. Additional Key Words: Ethofumesate, desmedipham, phenmedipham,","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.41.3.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Wyoming locations, Powell and Torrington Research and Extension Centers, to evaluate weed control efficacy and glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeet response to glyphosate alone and in combination with residual herbicides. Weed control with a single glyphosate application was inadequate for all species except wild mustard. Two sequential applications starting at 2-, 4-, and 6-leaf sugarbeet with a two week interval between applications provided more than 90% weed control. Similar weed control was provided with three applications starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet with one or two week intervals between applications, respective ly. Residual herbicides followed by one or two applications of' glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet provided excel lent weed control. No sugarbeet injury was recorded with glyphosate alone. However, sugarbeet injury with treat ments containing residual herbicides ranged from 0 to 10%. With glyphosate alone, sugarbeet root yield increased as the number and frequency of applications increased. Highest yields were obtained with two or three applications of glyphosate starting at 2- or 4-leaf sugarbeet. Similar yields were obtained with residual herbicides in combina tion with one or two applications of glyphosate starting at 4-leaf sugarbeet. None of the treatments, including the weedy check, affected sucrose content. Sucrose yield dif fered among treatments and corresponded to sugarbeet root yield. Additional Key Words: Ethofumesate, desmedipham, phenmedipham,