{"title":"Perspectives on the Relationship Between Phonological and Language Disorders","authors":"D. Aram, A. Kamhi","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theme of this review, phonological disorders in the context of language, reflects the increasing awareness of the importance of studying the interaction between phonological and language disorders in children rather than studying each of these disorder types separately. We should not fault ourselves entirely, however, for first having devoted a considerable amount of research effort toward describing the various behavioral and physiological correlates of children who demonstrate one or the other disorder type. The complexity of language suggests that its individual parts must first be understood before the relationship between those parts can be determined, though this is probably not the primary reason phonological and language disorders have been treated as separate disciplines in our field. Forces both outside and within this field have functioned to create and maintain the distinction between phonological and language disorders. Outside our field, psychologists and linguists traditionally have separated the two linguistic domains in question, phonology, on one hand, and syntax/semantics (language) on the other. For example, it has been only during the last decade or so that psycholinguists have attempted to determine the effect of higher level linguistic knowledge on the processes of speech perception and production (cf. Clark and Clark, 1977; Cutting and Pisoni, 1978). In the same vein, psychologists interested in language development typically have not been concerned with the processes of speech perception and production. As a case in point, Slobin's (1979) book on psycholinguistics does not even contain a chapter on speech perception or production. The same division can be found in linguistics. Despite some recent attempts to create integrative linguistic models which incorporate phonological and linguistic information (e.g., Chomsky and Halle, 1968; MacWhinney, 1978), linguists are divided readily into those who consider themselves phonologists or phoneticians as opposed to","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
The theme of this review, phonological disorders in the context of language, reflects the increasing awareness of the importance of studying the interaction between phonological and language disorders in children rather than studying each of these disorder types separately. We should not fault ourselves entirely, however, for first having devoted a considerable amount of research effort toward describing the various behavioral and physiological correlates of children who demonstrate one or the other disorder type. The complexity of language suggests that its individual parts must first be understood before the relationship between those parts can be determined, though this is probably not the primary reason phonological and language disorders have been treated as separate disciplines in our field. Forces both outside and within this field have functioned to create and maintain the distinction between phonological and language disorders. Outside our field, psychologists and linguists traditionally have separated the two linguistic domains in question, phonology, on one hand, and syntax/semantics (language) on the other. For example, it has been only during the last decade or so that psycholinguists have attempted to determine the effect of higher level linguistic knowledge on the processes of speech perception and production (cf. Clark and Clark, 1977; Cutting and Pisoni, 1978). In the same vein, psychologists interested in language development typically have not been concerned with the processes of speech perception and production. As a case in point, Slobin's (1979) book on psycholinguistics does not even contain a chapter on speech perception or production. The same division can be found in linguistics. Despite some recent attempts to create integrative linguistic models which incorporate phonological and linguistic information (e.g., Chomsky and Halle, 1968; MacWhinney, 1978), linguists are divided readily into those who consider themselves phonologists or phoneticians as opposed to
这篇综述的主题是语言语境中的语音障碍,反映了人们越来越意识到研究儿童语音和语言障碍之间的相互作用而不是单独研究每种类型的障碍的重要性。然而,我们不应该完全责怪自己,因为我们首先投入了大量的研究努力来描述表现出一种或另一种障碍类型的儿童的各种行为和生理关联。语言的复杂性表明,在确定各个部分之间的关系之前,必须首先理解语言的各个部分,尽管这可能不是语音障碍和语言障碍在我们的领域被视为单独学科的主要原因。这个领域内外的力量都在发挥作用,创造和维持语音障碍和语言障碍之间的区别。在我们的领域之外,心理学家和语言学家传统上把两个语言领域分开,一方面是音韵学,另一方面是语法/语义(语言)。例如,直到最近十年左右,心理语言学家才试图确定更高层次的语言知识对言语感知和产生过程的影响(参见Clark and Clark, 1977;Cutting and Pisoni, 1978)。同样,对语言发展感兴趣的心理学家通常不关注语言感知和产生的过程。作为一个恰当的例子,斯洛宾(1979)关于心理语言学的书甚至没有包含一个关于言语感知或产生的章节。在语言学中也可以找到同样的划分。尽管最近有一些尝试创建整合语音和语言信息的综合语言模型(例如,Chomsky和Halle, 1968;MacWhinney, 1978),语言学家很容易分为那些认为自己是语音学家或语音学家