A Preliminary Conceptualization and Analysis on Automated Static Analysis Tools for Vulnerability Detection in Android Apps

Giammaria Giordano, Fabio Palomba, F. Ferrucci
{"title":"A Preliminary Conceptualization and Analysis on Automated Static Analysis Tools for Vulnerability Detection in Android Apps","authors":"Giammaria Giordano, Fabio Palomba, F. Ferrucci","doi":"10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of dependable mobile apps is a crucial need for over three billion people who use apps daily for any social and emergency connectivity. A key challenge for mobile developers concerns the detection of security-related issues. While a number of tools have been proposed over the years—especially for the ANDROID operating system—we point out a lack of empirical investigations on the actual support provided by these tools; these might guide developers in selecting the most appropriate instruments to improve their apps. In this paper, we propose a preliminary conceptualization of the vulnerabilities detected by three automated static analysis tools such as ANDROBUGS2, TRUESEEING, and INSIDER. We first derive a taxonomy of the issues detectable by the tools. Then, we run the tools against a dataset composed of 6,500 ANDROID apps to investigate their detection capabilities in terms of frequency of detection of vulnerabilities and complementarity among tools. Key findings of the study show that current tools identify similar concerns, but they use different naming conventions. Perhaps more importantly, the tools only partially cover the most common vulnerabilities classified by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Foundation.","PeriodicalId":269970,"journal":{"name":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of dependable mobile apps is a crucial need for over three billion people who use apps daily for any social and emergency connectivity. A key challenge for mobile developers concerns the detection of security-related issues. While a number of tools have been proposed over the years—especially for the ANDROID operating system—we point out a lack of empirical investigations on the actual support provided by these tools; these might guide developers in selecting the most appropriate instruments to improve their apps. In this paper, we propose a preliminary conceptualization of the vulnerabilities detected by three automated static analysis tools such as ANDROBUGS2, TRUESEEING, and INSIDER. We first derive a taxonomy of the issues detectable by the tools. Then, we run the tools against a dataset composed of 6,500 ANDROID apps to investigate their detection capabilities in terms of frequency of detection of vulnerabilities and complementarity among tools. Key findings of the study show that current tools identify similar concerns, but they use different naming conventions. Perhaps more importantly, the tools only partially cover the most common vulnerabilities classified by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Foundation.
Android应用程序漏洞检测自动化静态分析工具的初步构想与分析
对于每天使用应用程序进行任何社交和紧急连接的30多亿人来说,可靠的移动应用程序的可用性是一个至关重要的需求。手机开发者面临的一个关键挑战是检测与安全相关的问题。虽然多年来已经提出了许多工具,特别是针对ANDROID操作系统,但我们指出缺乏对这些工具提供的实际支持的实证调查;这些可能会指导开发人员选择最合适的工具来改进他们的应用。在本文中,我们对ANDROBUGS2、TRUESEEING和INSIDER这三种自动化静态分析工具检测到的漏洞进行了初步的概念化。我们首先推导出可由工具检测到的问题的分类。然后,我们对由6500个ANDROID应用程序组成的数据集运行这些工具,以调查它们在漏洞检测频率和工具之间的互补性方面的检测能力。该研究的主要发现表明,当前的工具识别了类似的问题,但它们使用了不同的命名约定。也许更重要的是,这些工具只部分覆盖了开放Web应用程序安全项目基金会(OWASP)分类的最常见的漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信