The Data Ethics Challenges of Explainable AI and Their Knowledge-Based Solutions

M. d’Aquin
{"title":"The Data Ethics Challenges of Explainable AI and Their Knowledge-Based Solutions","authors":"M. d’Aquin","doi":"10.3233/SSW200023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explainable AI has recently gained momentum as an approach to overcome some of the more obvious ethical implications of the increasingly widespread application of AI (mostly machine learning). It is however not always completely evident whether providing explanations actually achieves to overcome those ethical issues, or rather create a false sense of control and transparency. This and other possible misuses of Explainable AI leads to the need to consider the possibility that providing explanations might itself represent a risk with respect to ethical implications at several levels. In this chapter, we explore through a series of scenarios how explanations in certain circunstances might affect negatively specific ethical values, from human agency to fairness. Through those scenarios, we discuss the need to consider ethical implications in the design and deployment of Explainable AI systems, focusing on how knowledge-based approaches can offer elements of solutions to the issues raised. We conclude on the requirements for ethical explanations, and on how hybrid-systems, combining machine learning with background knowledge, offer a way towards achieving those requirements.","PeriodicalId":331476,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Graphs for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence","volume":"120 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Graphs for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW200023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Explainable AI has recently gained momentum as an approach to overcome some of the more obvious ethical implications of the increasingly widespread application of AI (mostly machine learning). It is however not always completely evident whether providing explanations actually achieves to overcome those ethical issues, or rather create a false sense of control and transparency. This and other possible misuses of Explainable AI leads to the need to consider the possibility that providing explanations might itself represent a risk with respect to ethical implications at several levels. In this chapter, we explore through a series of scenarios how explanations in certain circunstances might affect negatively specific ethical values, from human agency to fairness. Through those scenarios, we discuss the need to consider ethical implications in the design and deployment of Explainable AI systems, focusing on how knowledge-based approaches can offer elements of solutions to the issues raised. We conclude on the requirements for ethical explanations, and on how hybrid-systems, combining machine learning with background knowledge, offer a way towards achieving those requirements.
可解释人工智能的数据伦理挑战及其基于知识的解决方案
最近,可解释的人工智能作为一种克服人工智能日益广泛应用(主要是机器学习)所带来的一些更明显的伦理影响的方法,获得了势头。然而,提供解释是否真的能够克服这些道德问题,或者创造一种虚假的控制和透明度,并不总是完全清楚的。这种情况以及其他可能滥用可解释人工智能的情况,导致我们需要考虑提供解释本身可能在几个层面上代表道德影响风险的可能性。在本章中,我们通过一系列的场景来探讨在某些情况下,解释如何对特定的道德价值观产生负面影响,从人类代理到公平。通过这些场景,我们讨论了在设计和部署可解释的人工智能系统时考虑伦理影响的必要性,重点关注基于知识的方法如何为所提出的问题提供解决方案的要素。我们总结了对伦理解释的要求,以及混合系统如何将机器学习与背景知识相结合,为实现这些要求提供了一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信