Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations.

W. Caughman, D. Chan, F. Rueggeberg
{"title":"Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations.","authors":"W. Caughman, D. Chan, F. Rueggeberg","doi":"10.1067/MPR.2001.114842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\nLittle is known about the ability of dual-polymerizable resin cements to polymerize when they are used in various clinical scenarios.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThis study was conducted to determine whether any of 6 commercially available dual-polymerizable resin cements should be classified as an \"all-purpose\" resin cement.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\n. Chemical conversion values (C=C converted to C-C, or the extent of the curing reaction) of 6 commercially available dual-polymerizable resin cements were determined with infrared spectroscopy in 5 clinically relevant scenarios. Scenarios included: using each cement in a dual-polymerizable mode (mixing of 2 pastes); light polymerizing curing through Mylar sheets (dual-Mylar), which served as the control; light polymerizing through 3-mm porcelain (dual-3 mm); and no exposure to light (dual-no light). The single-component light-polymerizable product was also tested as follows: exposed directly through Mylar (light-Mylar) or exposed through 3 mm of porcelain (light-3 mm). Results. For each product, dual-Mylar treatment yielded the highest conversion value of all treatments (control for each product). For all products, dual-3 mm conversion was at least 97% of control and equivalent to control, with the exception of Lute-It!. Dual-no light conversion was less than control treatment but at least 86% of control for all products except for Variolink II (62% of control). For all products in dual-no light mode, except Choice and Variolink II, conversion was at least equal to the light-Mylar values. Only 1 product (Variolink II) did not demonstrate increased conversion values for dual-Mylar compared with light-Mylar treatments. For most other products (Calibra, Insure, and Lute-It!), conversion values for light-3 mm were significantly less than for light-Mylar. Conversion values for Nexus, Choice, and Variolink II were equivalent between light-Mylar and light-3 mm treatments.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe choice of a dual-polymerizable cement should be based on its intended use because not all products polymerize adequately in every clinical situation. Although no cement met the stated criteria for an \"all-purpose\" cement, those tested did produce a range of product-specific results.","PeriodicalId":185384,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2001.114842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Little is known about the ability of dual-polymerizable resin cements to polymerize when they are used in various clinical scenarios. PURPOSE This study was conducted to determine whether any of 6 commercially available dual-polymerizable resin cements should be classified as an "all-purpose" resin cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS . Chemical conversion values (C=C converted to C-C, or the extent of the curing reaction) of 6 commercially available dual-polymerizable resin cements were determined with infrared spectroscopy in 5 clinically relevant scenarios. Scenarios included: using each cement in a dual-polymerizable mode (mixing of 2 pastes); light polymerizing curing through Mylar sheets (dual-Mylar), which served as the control; light polymerizing through 3-mm porcelain (dual-3 mm); and no exposure to light (dual-no light). The single-component light-polymerizable product was also tested as follows: exposed directly through Mylar (light-Mylar) or exposed through 3 mm of porcelain (light-3 mm). Results. For each product, dual-Mylar treatment yielded the highest conversion value of all treatments (control for each product). For all products, dual-3 mm conversion was at least 97% of control and equivalent to control, with the exception of Lute-It!. Dual-no light conversion was less than control treatment but at least 86% of control for all products except for Variolink II (62% of control). For all products in dual-no light mode, except Choice and Variolink II, conversion was at least equal to the light-Mylar values. Only 1 product (Variolink II) did not demonstrate increased conversion values for dual-Mylar compared with light-Mylar treatments. For most other products (Calibra, Insure, and Lute-It!), conversion values for light-3 mm were significantly less than for light-Mylar. Conversion values for Nexus, Choice, and Variolink II were equivalent between light-Mylar and light-3 mm treatments. CONCLUSION The choice of a dual-polymerizable cement should be based on its intended use because not all products polymerize adequately in every clinical situation. Although no cement met the stated criteria for an "all-purpose" cement, those tested did produce a range of product-specific results.
双可聚合树脂水泥在模拟临床情况下的固化潜力。
问题说明当双可聚合树脂水泥用于各种临床场景时,其聚合能力尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在确定6种市售双聚合树脂水泥中是否有任何一种应被归类为“通用”树脂水泥。材料和方法。采用红外光谱法测定了6种市售双可聚合树脂水泥在5种临床相关情况下的化学转化值(C=C转化为C-C,或固化反应的程度)。场景包括:以双可聚合模式使用每种水泥(混合2种膏体);光聚合固化通过Mylar片材(双Mylar片材),作为对照;光聚合通过3毫米瓷(双-3毫米);不暴露在光线下(双重不暴露)。单组分光聚合产品也进行了如下测试:直接通过聚酯薄膜(light-Mylar)暴露或通过3毫米的陶瓷(light-3毫米)暴露。结果。对于每种产品,双聚酯薄膜处理产生了所有处理中最高的转化值(每种产品的对照)。对于所有产品,除了Lute-It!外,双-3毫米转换至少为控制的97%,相当于控制。双无光转换低于对照处理,但除Variolink II(62%)外,所有产品至少为对照的86%。除Choice和Variolink II外,所有双无光模式下的产品,转换值至少等于光- mylar值。只有一种产品(Variolink II)没有显示出双mylar与光mylar处理相比增加的转换值。对于大多数其他产品(Calibra、Insure和Lute-It!), light-3毫米的转换值明显小于light-Mylar。Nexus、Choice和Variolink II的转换值在light-Mylar和light- 3mm处理之间是相等的。结论双聚合水泥的选择应基于其预期用途,因为并非所有产品在每种临床情况下都能充分聚合。尽管没有一种水泥符合“通用”水泥的规定标准,但这些测试确实产生了一系列产品特定的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信