Ethical challenges of researching emergent socio-material-technological phenomena: insights from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods project using mobile eye-tracking

Katja Kaufmann, T. Bork-Hüffer, Niklas Gudowsky, M. Rauhala, M. Rutzinger
{"title":"Ethical challenges of researching emergent socio-material-technological phenomena: insights from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods project using mobile eye-tracking","authors":"Katja Kaufmann, T. Bork-Hüffer, Niklas Gudowsky, M. Rauhala, M. Rutzinger","doi":"10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to discuss research ethics in mixed-methods research (MMR) and MMR development with a focus on ethical challenges that stem from working with technical instruments such as mobile eye-trackers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe case of an interdisciplinary mixed-methods development study that aimed at researching the impacts of emerging mobile augmented-reality technologies on the perception of public places serves as an example to discuss research-ethical challenges regarding (1) the practical implementation of the study, (2) data processing and management and (3) societal implications of developing instruments to track and understand human practices.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study reports challenges and experiences in ethical decision-making in the practical implementation of the study regarding the relationship to research subjects, the use of mobile research instruments in public places and the interdisciplinary cooperation among research team members. Further, this paper expounds on ethical challenges and recommendations in data processing and management and with a view to societal implications of method development and the aspirations of transdisciplinarity. This study concludes that institutionalized ethics need to become more flexible, while applied ethics and reflection must make their entry into university curricula across disciplines.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nComplex interdisciplinary mobile and mixed-methods projects that involve sensors and instruments such as mobile eye-trackers are on the rise. However, there is a significant lack of engagement with practical research ethical challenges, practices and requirements in both mixed-methods and method-development literature. By taking a context- and process-oriented perspective focusing on doing ethics, the paper contributes a concrete empirical case to these underdeveloped fields.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to discuss research ethics in mixed-methods research (MMR) and MMR development with a focus on ethical challenges that stem from working with technical instruments such as mobile eye-trackers. Design/methodology/approach The case of an interdisciplinary mixed-methods development study that aimed at researching the impacts of emerging mobile augmented-reality technologies on the perception of public places serves as an example to discuss research-ethical challenges regarding (1) the practical implementation of the study, (2) data processing and management and (3) societal implications of developing instruments to track and understand human practices. Findings This study reports challenges and experiences in ethical decision-making in the practical implementation of the study regarding the relationship to research subjects, the use of mobile research instruments in public places and the interdisciplinary cooperation among research team members. Further, this paper expounds on ethical challenges and recommendations in data processing and management and with a view to societal implications of method development and the aspirations of transdisciplinarity. This study concludes that institutionalized ethics need to become more flexible, while applied ethics and reflection must make their entry into university curricula across disciplines. Originality/value Complex interdisciplinary mobile and mixed-methods projects that involve sensors and instruments such as mobile eye-trackers are on the rise. However, there is a significant lack of engagement with practical research ethical challenges, practices and requirements in both mixed-methods and method-development literature. By taking a context- and process-oriented perspective focusing on doing ethics, the paper contributes a concrete empirical case to these underdeveloped fields.
研究新兴社会-物质-技术现象的伦理挑战:使用移动眼动追踪的跨学科混合方法项目的见解
本文旨在讨论混合方法研究(MMR)和MMR开发中的研究伦理,重点关注使用移动眼动仪等技术工具所产生的伦理挑战。设计/方法/方法一个跨学科的混合方法开发研究的案例,旨在研究新兴的移动增强现实技术对公共场所感知的影响,作为一个例子,讨论研究伦理挑战,涉及(1)研究的实际实施,(2)数据处理和管理,以及(3)开发工具跟踪和理解人类行为的社会影响。本研究报告了在研究的实际实施过程中,在与研究对象的关系、公共场所移动研究工具的使用以及研究团队成员之间的跨学科合作等方面,在伦理决策方面所面临的挑战和经验。此外,本文阐述了数据处理和管理中的伦理挑战和建议,并着眼于方法发展的社会影响和跨学科的愿望。本研究的结论是,制度化的伦理学需要变得更加灵活,而应用伦理学和反思必须进入跨学科的大学课程。涉及传感器和仪器(如移动眼动仪)的复杂跨学科移动和混合方法项目正在增加。然而,在混合方法和方法开发文献中,都明显缺乏对实际研究伦理挑战、实践和要求的参与。本文以情境和过程为导向,聚焦于行为伦理,为这些欠发达领域提供了一个具体的实证案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信