The Effect of Confucian Values on Support for Democracy and Human Rights in Taiwan

Joel S. Fetzer, J. Soper
{"title":"The Effect of Confucian Values on Support for Democracy and Human Rights in Taiwan","authors":"Joel S. Fetzer, J. Soper","doi":"10.29654/TJD.200707.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen a great deal of interest in the extent to which ”Asian values,” or Confucian ideology, inhibit a country's acceptance of liberal-democratic values. Much of that research, however, focused on the experience of nondemocratic states, concentrated on theory rather than empirical analysis, was written before the complete democratization of Taiwan, and/or created a pan-Confucian-values index instead of estimating the effects of the main components of Confucianism (family loyalty, social hierarchies, and social harmony) individually. In this article, we review theoretical arguments for why Confucian values would decrease public support for democratization, women’s rights, and freedom of speech. We then use OLS and Logit to estimate models of data from the Taiwan subsamples of the 1995 World Values Study and the 2001 East Asia Barometer. Our results indicate that adherence to Confucian values did not consistently undermine public support for liberal democracy in 1995 and even increased support for some liberal-democratic values in 2001. Our findings thus disconfirm previous empirical research on this question. The article concludes by discussing how Confucian and liberal-democratic values might reinforce rather than undermine each other.","PeriodicalId":403398,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan journal of democracy","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan journal of democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200707.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Recent years have seen a great deal of interest in the extent to which ”Asian values,” or Confucian ideology, inhibit a country's acceptance of liberal-democratic values. Much of that research, however, focused on the experience of nondemocratic states, concentrated on theory rather than empirical analysis, was written before the complete democratization of Taiwan, and/or created a pan-Confucian-values index instead of estimating the effects of the main components of Confucianism (family loyalty, social hierarchies, and social harmony) individually. In this article, we review theoretical arguments for why Confucian values would decrease public support for democratization, women’s rights, and freedom of speech. We then use OLS and Logit to estimate models of data from the Taiwan subsamples of the 1995 World Values Study and the 2001 East Asia Barometer. Our results indicate that adherence to Confucian values did not consistently undermine public support for liberal democracy in 1995 and even increased support for some liberal-democratic values in 2001. Our findings thus disconfirm previous empirical research on this question. The article concludes by discussing how Confucian and liberal-democratic values might reinforce rather than undermine each other.
儒家价值观对台湾民主与人权支持的影响
近年来,人们对“亚洲价值观”或儒家意识形态在多大程度上抑制了一个国家对自由民主价值观的接受感兴趣。然而,这些研究大多聚焦于非民主国家的经验,侧重于理论而非实证分析,是在台湾完全民主化之前写的,并且/或者创建了一个泛儒家价值观指数,而不是单独评估儒家思想的主要组成部分(家庭忠诚、社会等级和社会和谐)的影响。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了为什么儒家价值观会降低公众对民主化、妇女权利和言论自由的支持的理论论点。然后,我们使用OLS和Logit来估计1995年世界价值观研究和2001年东亚晴雨表的台湾子样本数据的模型。我们的研究结果表明,在1995年,对儒家价值观的坚持并没有持续削弱公众对自由民主的支持,甚至在2001年还增加了对某些自由民主价值观的支持。因此,我们的发现否定了之前关于这个问题的实证研究。文章最后讨论了儒家和自由民主价值观是如何相互加强而不是相互破坏的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信