An application study of CT perfusion imaging in assessing metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes in patients with T1 gastric cancer.

Zongqiong Sun, Shudong Hu, Jie Li, Teng Wang, Zhihui Xie, Lin-fang Jin
{"title":"An application study of CT perfusion imaging in assessing metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes in patients with T1 gastric cancer.","authors":"Zongqiong Sun, Shudong Hu, Jie Li, Teng Wang, Zhihui Xie, Lin-fang Jin","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20190790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo assess metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes (PLNs) in patients with T1 gastric cancer by using CT perfusion imaging (CTPI).\n\n\nMETHODS\nA total of 82 annotated PLNs of 33 patients with T1 gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) underwent CTPI and portal Phase CT scan before operation. The scan data were postprocessed to acquire perfusion maps and calculate perfusion parameters including blood flow (BF) and permeability surface (PS). A radiologist measured the short axis diameters and perfusion parameters of PLNs. According to the post-operative pathology result, PLNs were divided into two groups: metastatic and inflammatory LNs. Perfusion parameters values and the size of PLNs between two groups were respectively compared statistically by t test, and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff value with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nExamined 82 PLNs were metastatic in 45 (54.9%) and inflammatory in 37 (45.1%). The mean values of perfusion parameters and the short axis diameters in metastatic and inflammatory PLNs, respectively, were BF of 97.48 vs 81.21 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), PS of 45.11 vs 36.80 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), and the size of 1.51 cm vs 1.29 cm (p = 0.059). The sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 67.6% and AUC of 0.826 for BF with cutoff value of 88.89 ml/100 mg /min for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory nodes were higher than those of PS or the size of PLNs (p < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCT perfusion parameters values were different between metastatic and inflammatory PLNs in T1 gastric cancer. BF value may be the most reliable diagnostic marker of metastatic PLNs, and it is helpful for clinicians to choose treatment modality or management plan in T1 gastric cancer patients.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nCTPI gives information on vascularization of LNs.BF value might be a more effective marker than PS or the size of LNs for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory LNs in patients with T1 gastric cancer.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"40 23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess metastatic involvement of perigastric lymph nodes (PLNs) in patients with T1 gastric cancer by using CT perfusion imaging (CTPI). METHODS A total of 82 annotated PLNs of 33 patients with T1 gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) underwent CTPI and portal Phase CT scan before operation. The scan data were postprocessed to acquire perfusion maps and calculate perfusion parameters including blood flow (BF) and permeability surface (PS). A radiologist measured the short axis diameters and perfusion parameters of PLNs. According to the post-operative pathology result, PLNs were divided into two groups: metastatic and inflammatory LNs. Perfusion parameters values and the size of PLNs between two groups were respectively compared statistically by t test, and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff value with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Examined 82 PLNs were metastatic in 45 (54.9%) and inflammatory in 37 (45.1%). The mean values of perfusion parameters and the short axis diameters in metastatic and inflammatory PLNs, respectively, were BF of 97.48 vs 81.21 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), PS of 45.11 vs 36.80 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), and the size of 1.51 cm vs 1.29 cm (p = 0.059). The sensitivity of 84.4%, specificity of 67.6% and AUC of 0.826 for BF with cutoff value of 88.89 ml/100 mg /min for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory nodes were higher than those of PS or the size of PLNs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CT perfusion parameters values were different between metastatic and inflammatory PLNs in T1 gastric cancer. BF value may be the most reliable diagnostic marker of metastatic PLNs, and it is helpful for clinicians to choose treatment modality or management plan in T1 gastric cancer patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE CTPI gives information on vascularization of LNs.BF value might be a more effective marker than PS or the size of LNs for differentiating metastatic from inflammatory LNs in patients with T1 gastric cancer.
CT灌注成像在T1期胃癌胃周淋巴结转移累及评估中的应用研究。
目的应用CT灌注成像(CTPI)评价T1期胃癌患者胃周淋巴结(PLNs)转移情况。方法33例经超声内镜(EUS)确诊的T1期胃癌患者,术前行CTPI和门静脉期CT扫描,共82例带注释的pln。对扫描数据进行后处理,获得灌注图,计算血流(BF)、通透面(PS)等灌注参数。放射科医生测量了pln的短轴直径和灌注参数。根据术后病理结果,将pln分为转移性和炎性两组。采用t检验对两组灌注参数值及pln大小进行统计学比较,采用受试者-工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,结合敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)确定最佳诊断截断值。结果82例pln转移45例(54.9%),炎性37例(45.1%)。转移性和炎症性PLNs灌注参数均值和短轴直径均值分别为:BF 97.48 vs 81.21 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001), PS 45.11 vs 36.80 ml/100 mg /min (p < 0.001),大小1.51 cm vs 1.29 cm (p = 0.059)。BF鉴别炎性淋巴结转移的敏感性为84.4%,特异性为67.6%,AUC为0.826,临界值为88.89 ml/100 mg /min,高于PS和PLNs大小(p < 0.001)。结论T1期胃癌转移性与炎性pln的sct灌注参数值存在差异。BF值可能是转移性pln最可靠的诊断指标,有助于临床医生在T1胃癌患者中选择治疗方式或管理方案。知识进展:pi提供了LNs血管化的信息。在T1胃癌患者中,BF值可能是鉴别转移性和炎性LNs更有效的标志物,而不是PS或LNs的大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信