Estimating cardiac output from arterial blood pressurewaveforms: a critical evaluation using the MIMIC II database

J. Sun, A. Reisner, M. Saeed, R. Mark
{"title":"Estimating cardiac output from arterial blood pressurewaveforms: a critical evaluation using the MIMIC II database","authors":"J. Sun, A. Reisner, M. Saeed, R. Mark","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2005.1588095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac output (CO) estimation using arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveforms has been an active area of physiology research over the past century. However, the effectiveness of the estimators has not been extensively studied in a clinical setting. In this paper, we evaluate 11 well-known CO estimators using clinical radial ABP waveforms from the multi-parameter intelligent monitoring for intensive care II (MIMIC II) database, using thermodilution CO (TCO) as reference for comparison. We compare estimations to 988 TCO measurements in 84 patients, totaling 165 hours of ABP waveforms sampled at 125 Hz. As a necessary step for producing absolute CO estimates, we also present 3 methods of calibrating the estimators, each tailored towards a different use model. The results show that the standard deviation of error between TCO and the best CO estimators is approximately 1 L/min for absolute CO estimates. For relative estimates without calibration, the best CO estimator has 18% error at 1 standard deviation","PeriodicalId":239491,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Cardiology, 2005","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Cardiology, 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2005.1588095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) estimation using arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveforms has been an active area of physiology research over the past century. However, the effectiveness of the estimators has not been extensively studied in a clinical setting. In this paper, we evaluate 11 well-known CO estimators using clinical radial ABP waveforms from the multi-parameter intelligent monitoring for intensive care II (MIMIC II) database, using thermodilution CO (TCO) as reference for comparison. We compare estimations to 988 TCO measurements in 84 patients, totaling 165 hours of ABP waveforms sampled at 125 Hz. As a necessary step for producing absolute CO estimates, we also present 3 methods of calibrating the estimators, each tailored towards a different use model. The results show that the standard deviation of error between TCO and the best CO estimators is approximately 1 L/min for absolute CO estimates. For relative estimates without calibration, the best CO estimator has 18% error at 1 standard deviation
从动脉血压波形估计心输出量:使用MIMIC II数据库的关键评估
在过去的一个世纪里,利用动脉血压(ABP)波形估算心输出量(CO)一直是生理学研究的一个活跃领域。然而,评估器的有效性尚未在临床环境中得到广泛研究。本文采用多参数重症监护智能监测II (MIMIC II)数据库中的临床径向ABP波形评估了11个知名的CO估计器,并以热分解CO (TCO)作为参考进行了比较。我们比较了84例患者的988个TCO测量值,总计165小时的125 Hz采样ABP波形。作为产生绝对CO估计值的必要步骤,我们还提出了3种校准估计值的方法,每种方法都针对不同的使用模型进行了定制。结果表明,对于绝对CO估计值,TCO与最佳CO估计值之间的误差标准差约为1 L/min。对于没有校准的相对估计,最好的CO估计器在1个标准差处有18%的误差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信