Whoops... did I use the wrong concept to predict e-commerce trust? Modeling the risk-related effects of trust versus distrust concepts

Harrison McKnight, Chuck Kacmar, V. Choudhury
{"title":"Whoops... did I use the wrong concept to predict e-commerce trust? Modeling the risk-related effects of trust versus distrust concepts","authors":"Harrison McKnight, Chuck Kacmar, V. Choudhury","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant work has been initiated on trust in e-commerce settings, but little research has addressed distrust. Because of its connection to the insecurities that are found in risky situations, disposition to distrust is particularly suited to addressing issues of high risk, while disposition to trust is better suited for low risk issues. High risk issues include: a) perceptions that the Web is risky; and b) a willingness to depend on a specific unknown Web vendor in light of that risk. This theoretical position serves as the basis of a model of what causes consumers to initially decide to trust/distrust the Web and to explore and trust a Web site. The model includes three dispositions to trust constructs and one disposition to distrust construct. As proposed, the study found that disposition to trust predicted the low risk Web constructs, while disposition to distrust predicted the high risk Web constructs. This suggests that disposition to distrust has greater potential for predicting high-risk outcome constructs in e-commerce. This article contributes by showing how various aspects of disposition to trust/distrust affect consumer Web perceptions in different ways, depending on their level of risk. For e-commerce research, the findings of this article suggest that perhaps scholars have been studying a less effective factor for addressing risk - disposition to trust - instead of what may be a more effective factor - disposition to distrust.","PeriodicalId":159242,"journal":{"name":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

Significant work has been initiated on trust in e-commerce settings, but little research has addressed distrust. Because of its connection to the insecurities that are found in risky situations, disposition to distrust is particularly suited to addressing issues of high risk, while disposition to trust is better suited for low risk issues. High risk issues include: a) perceptions that the Web is risky; and b) a willingness to depend on a specific unknown Web vendor in light of that risk. This theoretical position serves as the basis of a model of what causes consumers to initially decide to trust/distrust the Web and to explore and trust a Web site. The model includes three dispositions to trust constructs and one disposition to distrust construct. As proposed, the study found that disposition to trust predicted the low risk Web constructs, while disposition to distrust predicted the high risk Web constructs. This suggests that disposition to distrust has greater potential for predicting high-risk outcome constructs in e-commerce. This article contributes by showing how various aspects of disposition to trust/distrust affect consumer Web perceptions in different ways, depending on their level of risk. For e-commerce research, the findings of this article suggest that perhaps scholars have been studying a less effective factor for addressing risk - disposition to trust - instead of what may be a more effective factor - disposition to distrust.
哎呀……我是否使用了错误的概念来预测电子商务信任?对信任与不信任概念的风险相关影响进行建模
在电子商务环境中的信任方面已经开展了大量工作,但很少有研究解决不信任问题。由于它与风险情境中的不安全感有关,不信任倾向特别适合处理高风险问题,而信任倾向更适合处理低风险问题。高风险问题包括:a)认为网络是有风险的;b)考虑到该风险,是否愿意依赖某个特定的未知Web供应商。这一理论立场可以作为一个模型的基础,说明是什么导致消费者最初决定信任/不信任Web,以及探索和信任Web站点。该模型包括三个信任倾向和一个不信任倾向。研究发现,信任倾向可以预测低风险的网络结构,而不信任倾向可以预测高风险的网络结构。这表明不信任倾向在预测电子商务中的高风险结果构建方面具有更大的潜力。本文通过展示信任/不信任倾向的各个方面如何以不同的方式影响消费者的Web感知,这取决于他们的风险水平。对于电子商务研究,本文的发现表明,也许学者们一直在研究解决风险的一个不太有效的因素——信任倾向——而不是一个可能更有效的因素——不信任倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信