E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law

Hafizh Daffa Setiawan, Dennis Wye Keen Khon
{"title":"E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law","authors":"Hafizh Daffa Setiawan, Dennis Wye Keen Khon","doi":"10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of electronic information electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence and is a continuation of the evidence in the applicable Procedural Law in Indonesia, that electronic information and/or electronic documents use electronic systems with the provisions of Law Number 19 of 2016 which amends Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE. The writing focuses on highlighting two legal issues related to the submission of electronic evidence in the e-court evidentiary system, namely regarding the problems faced in efforts to legitimize electronic evidence in proving a case and a proportional mechanism facing the problem of the legitimacy of electronic evidence The complete discussion of electronic courts which includes the evidentiary stage has not taken place due to various obstacles,  among others, regulation, availability of supporting facilities and human resources (HR). The study of this legal issue is important in order to optimize the work of electronic justice, so that the modernization of the judicial system is carried out more quickly with an IT approach, if only to realize the vision of the Supreme Court and ensure better access to justice in the future. As a result of this study, it was concluded that the validation process of electronic evidence in electronic evidence is an important stage that cannot be excluded in determining the validity of electronic evidence and the importance of strict digital judicial procedures in the process of validating electronic evidence.","PeriodicalId":156893,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.68232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of electronic information electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence and is a continuation of the evidence in the applicable Procedural Law in Indonesia, that electronic information and/or electronic documents use electronic systems with the provisions of Law Number 19 of 2016 which amends Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE. The writing focuses on highlighting two legal issues related to the submission of electronic evidence in the e-court evidentiary system, namely regarding the problems faced in efforts to legitimize electronic evidence in proving a case and a proportional mechanism facing the problem of the legitimacy of electronic evidence The complete discussion of electronic courts which includes the evidentiary stage has not taken place due to various obstacles,  among others, regulation, availability of supporting facilities and human resources (HR). The study of this legal issue is important in order to optimize the work of electronic justice, so that the modernization of the judicial system is carried out more quickly with an IT approach, if only to realize the vision of the Supreme Court and ensure better access to justice in the future. As a result of this study, it was concluded that the validation process of electronic evidence in electronic evidence is an important stage that cannot be excluded in determining the validity of electronic evidence and the importance of strict digital judicial procedures in the process of validating electronic evidence.
电子法院范式转换:国家行政诉讼法中电子证据合法性机制问题
电子信息和/或电子文件的存在已被认定为有效证据,是印度尼西亚适用的诉讼法中证据的延续,电子信息和/或电子文件使用电子系统,符合2016年第19号法律的规定,该法律修订了2008年第11号法律关于ITE的规定。本文着重强调了电子法庭证据制度中电子证据提交的两个相关法律问题,即电子证据举证合法化面临的问题和电子证据合法性问题面临的比例机制问题。由于各种障碍,包括监管,对包括证据阶段在内的电子法庭尚未进行完整的讨论。辅助设施和人力资源(HR)的可用性。这一法律问题的研究对于优化电子司法工作,使司法系统的现代化以信息技术的方式更快地进行具有重要意义,如果只是为了实现最高法院的愿景,并确保未来更好地获得司法公正。通过本研究得出结论:电子证据中的电子证据验证过程是确定电子证据有效性中不可排除的重要阶段,严格的数字司法程序在电子证据验证过程中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信