Surgeons’ Survey of the Aging Face With a Focus on the Aging Nose

Elise L. Ehland, Husain Ali Khan
{"title":"Surgeons’ Survey of the Aging Face With a Focus on the Aging Nose","authors":"Elise L. Ehland, Husain Ali Khan","doi":"10.1177/07488068221111665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate how facial cosmetic surgeons rank different areas of the aging face by comparing those areas for the greatest impact on surgical rejuvenation. It was hypothesized that the nose would be ranked lower than most other areas of the aging face. Fifty surveys were included in this study and were completed by surgeons from the following specialties: oral and maxillofacial surgery, oculoplastic surgery, otolaryngology, general surgery, plastic surgery, dermatology, and obstetrics/gynecology. The 12 ranked areas of the face (from 1 to 12) were skin, hair/hairline, brows, periorbital area, nose, ears, cheeks, midface/nasolabial area, dentition, perioral area, lower face/chin/jowls, and neck. Each of these areas of the face was also rated based on the surgeons’ assessment of the level of importance when evaluating and treating the aging face on a 5-level scale, ranging from level 1 (not important) to level 5 (very important). The average rank for the nose was 9.30. The highest average ranking was the periorbital region with 2.74 and the lowest average ranking was the ears at 11.02. The surgeons’ ratings of the nose were 0% for level 1 (not important), 20% for level 2 (slightly important), 30% for level 3 (somewhat important), 26% for level 4 (important), and 16% for level 5 (very important). The average level rating of the nose was 3.413 (somewhat important). In comparison, the highest average rating was for the periorbital region at 4.837 (very important) and the lowest average rating was the ears at 2.957 (somewhat important). Using a significance level of P < .05, the nose is both ranked and rated as less important than 7 out of 11 other areas of the face: the periorbital area, the lower face, the skin, the neck, the midface, the perioral area, and the cheeks. The difference between the ranking and rating of the nose and that of the brows, dentition, hairline, and the ears was not considered significant. This study confirmed the hypothesis that when comparing the areas of the aging face that would have the most effect on surgical facial rejuvenation, the nose was ranked lower than most other areas of the face except the ears. The nose undergoes multiple anatomical changes with age that affect both appearance and nasal function. Therefore, the rhinoplasty for the aging nose should not be overlooked as an important contributor to facial rejuvenation and a potential to improve nasal function. The nose is most often considered of lower importance compared with other areas of the face by facial cosmetic surgeons when evaluated for impact on surgical facial rejuvenation.","PeriodicalId":297650,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221111665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how facial cosmetic surgeons rank different areas of the aging face by comparing those areas for the greatest impact on surgical rejuvenation. It was hypothesized that the nose would be ranked lower than most other areas of the aging face. Fifty surveys were included in this study and were completed by surgeons from the following specialties: oral and maxillofacial surgery, oculoplastic surgery, otolaryngology, general surgery, plastic surgery, dermatology, and obstetrics/gynecology. The 12 ranked areas of the face (from 1 to 12) were skin, hair/hairline, brows, periorbital area, nose, ears, cheeks, midface/nasolabial area, dentition, perioral area, lower face/chin/jowls, and neck. Each of these areas of the face was also rated based on the surgeons’ assessment of the level of importance when evaluating and treating the aging face on a 5-level scale, ranging from level 1 (not important) to level 5 (very important). The average rank for the nose was 9.30. The highest average ranking was the periorbital region with 2.74 and the lowest average ranking was the ears at 11.02. The surgeons’ ratings of the nose were 0% for level 1 (not important), 20% for level 2 (slightly important), 30% for level 3 (somewhat important), 26% for level 4 (important), and 16% for level 5 (very important). The average level rating of the nose was 3.413 (somewhat important). In comparison, the highest average rating was for the periorbital region at 4.837 (very important) and the lowest average rating was the ears at 2.957 (somewhat important). Using a significance level of P < .05, the nose is both ranked and rated as less important than 7 out of 11 other areas of the face: the periorbital area, the lower face, the skin, the neck, the midface, the perioral area, and the cheeks. The difference between the ranking and rating of the nose and that of the brows, dentition, hairline, and the ears was not considered significant. This study confirmed the hypothesis that when comparing the areas of the aging face that would have the most effect on surgical facial rejuvenation, the nose was ranked lower than most other areas of the face except the ears. The nose undergoes multiple anatomical changes with age that affect both appearance and nasal function. Therefore, the rhinoplasty for the aging nose should not be overlooked as an important contributor to facial rejuvenation and a potential to improve nasal function. The nose is most often considered of lower importance compared with other areas of the face by facial cosmetic surgeons when evaluated for impact on surgical facial rejuvenation.
外科医生对面部老化的调查,重点是鼻子老化
本研究的目的是评估面部整形外科医生如何通过比较那些对手术恢复活力影响最大的区域来对衰老面部的不同区域进行排名。据推测,鼻子的排名将低于衰老脸部的大多数其他部位。本研究包括50份调查,由下列专业的外科医生完成:口腔颌面外科、眼整形外科、耳鼻喉科、普外科、整形外科、皮肤科和妇产科。面部的12个区域(从1到12)依次为皮肤、头发/发际线、眉毛、眶周区、鼻子、耳朵、脸颊、脸中/鼻唇区、牙列、口周区、脸下/下巴/下巴和颈部。在评估和治疗衰老面部时,根据外科医生对重要性的评估,对面部的每一个区域进行了5个等级的评估,从1级(不重要)到5级(非常重要)。鼻子的平均排名是9.30。平均评分最高的是眶周,为2.74,最低的是耳朵,为11.02。外科医生对鼻子的评分1级为0%(不重要),2级为20%(略重要),3级为30%(有些重要),4级为26%(重要),5级为16%(非常重要)。鼻子的平均水平评级为3.413(有些重要)。相比之下,平均评分最高的是眶周区域,为4.837(非常重要),平均评分最低的是耳朵,为2.957(比较重要)。使用P < 0.05的显著性水平,鼻子的重要性在11个面部区域中排名和评级都低于7个:眶周区域、下脸、皮肤、颈部、中脸、口周区域和脸颊。鼻子与眉毛、牙列、发际线和耳朵的排名和评级之间的差异不被认为是显著的。这项研究证实了一个假设,即当比较面部衰老的区域对手术面部年轻化的影响最大时,鼻子的排名低于除耳朵以外的大多数其他面部区域。随着年龄的增长,鼻子经历了多种解剖变化,影响了鼻子的外观和功能。因此,鼻整形术作为面部年轻化和改善鼻功能的重要手段,不应被忽视。在评估面部整形手术对面部年轻化的影响时,与面部其他部位相比,鼻子通常被认为是最不重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信