Evaluación dE la fiabilidad dEntro y EntrE los EvaluadorEs y intEr-técnicas para los trEs instrumEntos quE midEn la ExtEnsibilidad dE los músculos isquiotibialEs
Cristina Maria Boldrini, Flávia Tomé, Juliana Moesch, Juliana Schmatz Mallmann, L. Oliveira, Natália Roberti, Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini
{"title":"Evaluación dE la fiabilidad dEntro y EntrE los EvaluadorEs y intEr-técnicas para los trEs instrumEntos quE midEn la ExtEnsibilidad dE los músculos isquiotibialEs","authors":"Cristina Maria Boldrini, Flávia Tomé, Juliana Moesch, Juliana Schmatz Mallmann, L. Oliveira, Natália Roberti, Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini","doi":"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : The measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in therapeutic evaluations. It was evaluated the reliability intra and inter-valuators and inter-techniques, for three tools that measured the extensibility of the hamstring. Materials and Methods : The sample was composed of university students (n=20 /22.6 ± 1.5 years). It was measured the extensibility of hamstring muscles of the right lower limb, and for this, ROM of the knee was examined by means of three tools: universal goniometer (UG), fixed goniometer (FG) and board goniometry (BO). There were six valuators in all, two by instrument (valuators A and B). The reliability was obtained by the index of correlation interclasses (ICC). Results : The intra-valuators reliability was heterogeneous, being: absent (FGA); moderate (UGB); high (UGA and BOB) and very high (FGB and BOA). The inter-valuators reliability was low for the FG and high for the other tools; while the inter-technique was high between UG and BO, but moderate when involving the FG. Discussion : It was observed that UG and BO are more reliable than FG and, in the clinical practice, allows an examiner to choose the tool that it is more accessible to him.","PeriodicalId":164994,"journal":{"name":"Fitness & Performance Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fitness & Performance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction : The measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in therapeutic evaluations. It was evaluated the reliability intra and inter-valuators and inter-techniques, for three tools that measured the extensibility of the hamstring. Materials and Methods : The sample was composed of university students (n=20 /22.6 ± 1.5 years). It was measured the extensibility of hamstring muscles of the right lower limb, and for this, ROM of the knee was examined by means of three tools: universal goniometer (UG), fixed goniometer (FG) and board goniometry (BO). There were six valuators in all, two by instrument (valuators A and B). The reliability was obtained by the index of correlation interclasses (ICC). Results : The intra-valuators reliability was heterogeneous, being: absent (FGA); moderate (UGB); high (UGA and BOB) and very high (FGB and BOA). The inter-valuators reliability was low for the FG and high for the other tools; while the inter-technique was high between UG and BO, but moderate when involving the FG. Discussion : It was observed that UG and BO are more reliable than FG and, in the clinical practice, allows an examiner to choose the tool that it is more accessible to him.