{"title":"Charles Olson's 'The Kingfishers' and Quantum Physics","authors":"Dominic Hand","doi":"10.1093/camqtly/bfz028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Through close readings of both published and draft versions of Charles Olson's 'The Kingfishers', this essay highlights Olson's exploitation of possibilities presented by post-WWII quantum physics and associated science, including in terms of feedback, mutability and reversible time. Qualifying historicist readings, the essay traces the influence of quantum physics on the poem's conceptualisations, metaphorical framework, and phonetic patterning. It then discusses why Olson excised this level of signification from the published version, stresses his pragmatic desire to use science as a means of extending and transforming poetic practice, and argues that he challenged culture-science binarisms more fundamentally than many contemporaries.","PeriodicalId":374258,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract:Through close readings of both published and draft versions of Charles Olson's 'The Kingfishers', this essay highlights Olson's exploitation of possibilities presented by post-WWII quantum physics and associated science, including in terms of feedback, mutability and reversible time. Qualifying historicist readings, the essay traces the influence of quantum physics on the poem's conceptualisations, metaphorical framework, and phonetic patterning. It then discusses why Olson excised this level of signification from the published version, stresses his pragmatic desire to use science as a means of extending and transforming poetic practice, and argues that he challenged culture-science binarisms more fundamentally than many contemporaries.