Navigating the Practicalities of Achieving Diversity in Arbitration

Animesh Bordoloi
{"title":"Navigating the Practicalities of Achieving Diversity in Arbitration","authors":"Animesh Bordoloi","doi":"10.52028/rbadr.v4i8.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Available literature highlights that though most countries had their own form of private dispute settlement, similar to an unorganized form of arbitration, the development of modern international commercial arbitration, as it exists today, dates back to several concrete steps taken in the twentieth century by Western countries. Decades later, this Western influence continues to be highly pervasive, and is one of the important contributing factors for practitioners from such regions enjoying the greatest number of appointments as arbitrators. This has led to serious debates revolving around diversity and inclusivity in arbitral tribunals. Through this research paper, the authors attempt to examine the various factors that affect these ideas of ‘inclusivity’ as well as ‘diversity’, and how these ideas are consistent or inconsistent with the fundamental principles underlying arbitration. The paper discusses various initiatives that have been undertaken to increase all forms of diversity – of nationality, race, gender, culture, and so on- and then evaluates the effectiveness of the same. It also analyzes the idea of ‘familiarity’ in appointment of arbitrators, including the idea of an arbitrator’s previous experience, and if at all it would be fair to ask parties to give up on their autonomy while pushing for diversity in the tribunal. The research is premised on the hypothesis that there exists an inherent tension between these ideas. Given that most legislations recognize the autonomy of contracting parties are extremely essential, any initiative seeking to increase diversity might turn out to be a complex one. The authors also discuss, as a case study, the structure of the Indian judicial system, which in the absence of any definite setup has struggled to create and sustain diversity, particularly from the gender vantage. The paper concludes by discussing plausible solutions, structures and stakeholders, which if identified, as well as regulated efficiently, can play a significant role in pushing for such changes.","PeriodicalId":101933,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i8.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Available literature highlights that though most countries had their own form of private dispute settlement, similar to an unorganized form of arbitration, the development of modern international commercial arbitration, as it exists today, dates back to several concrete steps taken in the twentieth century by Western countries. Decades later, this Western influence continues to be highly pervasive, and is one of the important contributing factors for practitioners from such regions enjoying the greatest number of appointments as arbitrators. This has led to serious debates revolving around diversity and inclusivity in arbitral tribunals. Through this research paper, the authors attempt to examine the various factors that affect these ideas of ‘inclusivity’ as well as ‘diversity’, and how these ideas are consistent or inconsistent with the fundamental principles underlying arbitration. The paper discusses various initiatives that have been undertaken to increase all forms of diversity – of nationality, race, gender, culture, and so on- and then evaluates the effectiveness of the same. It also analyzes the idea of ‘familiarity’ in appointment of arbitrators, including the idea of an arbitrator’s previous experience, and if at all it would be fair to ask parties to give up on their autonomy while pushing for diversity in the tribunal. The research is premised on the hypothesis that there exists an inherent tension between these ideas. Given that most legislations recognize the autonomy of contracting parties are extremely essential, any initiative seeking to increase diversity might turn out to be a complex one. The authors also discuss, as a case study, the structure of the Indian judicial system, which in the absence of any definite setup has struggled to create and sustain diversity, particularly from the gender vantage. The paper concludes by discussing plausible solutions, structures and stakeholders, which if identified, as well as regulated efficiently, can play a significant role in pushing for such changes.
导航实现仲裁多样性的实用性
现有文献强调,虽然大多数国家都有自己的私人争端解决形式,类似于无组织的仲裁形式,但现代国际商事仲裁的发展,就像它今天存在的那样,可以追溯到西方国家在20世纪采取的几个具体步骤。几十年后,这种西方的影响仍然非常普遍,这是这些地区的从业人员享有最多的仲裁员任命的重要因素之一。这引发了围绕仲裁法庭多样性和包容性的严肃辩论。通过这篇研究论文,作者试图研究影响这些“包容性”和“多样性”概念的各种因素,以及这些概念如何与仲裁的基本原则一致或不一致。本文讨论了为增加各种形式的多样性- -国籍、种族、性别、文化等等- -而采取的各种主动行动,然后评估了这些行动的有效性。它还分析了任命仲裁员时的“熟悉度”概念,包括仲裁员以前的经验,以及在推动仲裁庭多元化的同时,要求各方放弃自主权是否公平。这项研究的前提假设是,这些观点之间存在着内在的张力。鉴于大多数立法承认缔约各方的自主权是极其重要的,任何寻求增加多样性的倡议都可能是一项复杂的倡议。作者还讨论了印度司法系统的结构,作为一个案例研究,在没有任何明确设置的情况下,印度司法系统一直在努力创造和维持多样性,特别是从性别优势出发。本文最后讨论了可行的解决方案、结构和利益相关者,如果确定并有效监管,它们可以在推动此类变革方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书