System Perturbation: Conflict in the Age of Globalisation

B. Hayes, Thomas P. M. Barnett
{"title":"System Perturbation: Conflict in the Age of Globalisation","authors":"B. Hayes, Thomas P. M. Barnett","doi":"10.1163/9789004495364_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Aperiodically, the international system reorders itself normally in the aftermath of a major conflict. This reordering is accompanied by the implementation of new rule sets in an attempt to firewall states from the causes of the conflict. Policy makers have openly enquired whether the end of the Cold War and the birth of the information age requires a new firebreak and the implementation of a new set of rules. Because \"great power war\" has been the proximate cause of past restructuring, great power war has been the ordering principle for international (and national) rules and institutions. Recent events indicate that a new ordering principle is required (one in which great power war is but one possible outcome). In helping America's Defense Department think through the future of international security, the authors have proposed that \"system perturbation\" be examined as the new ordering principle. The best way to describe this ordering principle is to examine what happened on and after September 11th. The attacks of 9/11 were not acts perpetrated by a nation-state using traditional methods of warfare. Yet their effect was momentous, like a giant stone dropped in a calm pond. The initial vertical shock was spectacular, but the resulting horizontal ripples had longer-lasting effects that went well beyond the security field. This paper examines the underlying precepts of system perturbation and potential triggers that could lead to great power conflict. It argues that these triggers will likely foment in places where globalization is actively resisted and by individuals who will use information age tools to oppose globalization's spread and content. They argue that great powers are less likely to confront one another than they are to cooperate to eliminate super-empowered individuals (or groups) trying to disrupt the global economy. This paper examines the effects of the 9/11 perturbation on security, environment, technology, culture, health, and economics.","PeriodicalId":384069,"journal":{"name":"War and Virtual War","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War and Virtual War","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495364_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract : Aperiodically, the international system reorders itself normally in the aftermath of a major conflict. This reordering is accompanied by the implementation of new rule sets in an attempt to firewall states from the causes of the conflict. Policy makers have openly enquired whether the end of the Cold War and the birth of the information age requires a new firebreak and the implementation of a new set of rules. Because "great power war" has been the proximate cause of past restructuring, great power war has been the ordering principle for international (and national) rules and institutions. Recent events indicate that a new ordering principle is required (one in which great power war is but one possible outcome). In helping America's Defense Department think through the future of international security, the authors have proposed that "system perturbation" be examined as the new ordering principle. The best way to describe this ordering principle is to examine what happened on and after September 11th. The attacks of 9/11 were not acts perpetrated by a nation-state using traditional methods of warfare. Yet their effect was momentous, like a giant stone dropped in a calm pond. The initial vertical shock was spectacular, but the resulting horizontal ripples had longer-lasting effects that went well beyond the security field. This paper examines the underlying precepts of system perturbation and potential triggers that could lead to great power conflict. It argues that these triggers will likely foment in places where globalization is actively resisted and by individuals who will use information age tools to oppose globalization's spread and content. They argue that great powers are less likely to confront one another than they are to cooperate to eliminate super-empowered individuals (or groups) trying to disrupt the global economy. This paper examines the effects of the 9/11 perturbation on security, environment, technology, culture, health, and economics.
系统扰动:全球化时代的冲突
摘要:国际体系通常会在重大冲突之后进行非周期性的自我调整。这种重新排序伴随着新规则集的实现,试图将国家与冲突的原因隔离开来。政策制定者已经公开询问,冷战的结束和信息时代的诞生是否需要一个新的防火墙和一套新规则的实施。由于“大国战争”是过去重构的直接原因,大国战争一直是国际(和国家)规则和制度的秩序原则。最近的事件表明,需要一种新的秩序原则(大国战争只是其中一种可能的结果)。为了帮助美国国防部思考国际安全的未来,作者们建议将“系统扰动”作为新的秩序原则加以研究。描述这一排序原则的最佳方式是考察9月11日当天及之后发生的事情。9/11恐怖袭击并不是由一个民族国家使用传统的战争方法实施的。然而,它们的影响是巨大的,就像一块巨石掉进了平静的池塘。最初的垂直冲击是惊人的,但由此产生的水平涟漪具有更持久的影响,远远超出了安全领域。本文考察了系统扰动的基本规律和可能导致大国冲突的潜在触发因素。它认为,这些触发因素可能会在那些全球化受到积极抵制的地方,以及那些将使用信息时代工具反对全球化传播和内容的个人那里被煽动。他们认为,大国之间不太可能相互对抗,而更可能合作消灭试图扰乱全球经济的超级强大个人(或团体)。本文考察了9/11事件对安全、环境、技术、文化、健康和经济的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信