Imaging Study & Surgical Perspective Of Cochlear Implantees

M. D. Hossain, M. K. Arefin, M. B. Hossain, Iftekharul Alam, A. Asaduzzaman, Syed Zoherul Alam
{"title":"Imaging Study & Surgical Perspective Of Cochlear Implantees","authors":"M. D. Hossain, M. K. Arefin, M. B. Hossain, Iftekharul Alam, A. Asaduzzaman, Syed Zoherul Alam","doi":"10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A cross-sectional prospective clinical study was done to evaluate the inner ear anomalies in candidates undergoing cochlear implantation.\nMaterials and Methods: Study was carried out over a period of 07 years (Jan 2013 to Dec 2019) at Cochlear Implant Centre, Combined Military Hospital Dhaka. A total 206 deaf candidates, both pre and post lingual, were included in convenient sampling method.\nResult: The sample consisted of 206 candidates, of whom 117 (56.80%) were female and 89 (43.20%) were male. All candidates had severe to profound bilateral deafness. 182 (88.35%) of them were pre and 24 (11.65%) were in post lingual group. All patients diagnosed audiologically as profound deafness underwent HRCT scan of temporal bone with 3D reconstruction of cochlea and MRI of internal auditory canal & brain. Radiological examination revealed that 36 (17.47%) candidates had ear anomalies. Mondini deformity 14 (06.80%), cochlear ossification 11 (5.34%), large vestibular aqueduct 04 (1.94%), high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%) and anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%) were noted. During intervention, 42 (20.39%) candidates had anomalous intra operative findings. Among them CSF gusher 19 (9.23%), ossification of basal turn 12 (5.83%), isolated rotated Cochlea 02 (0.97%), high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%), anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%), and very high facial nerve 02 (0.97%) were observed. During surgery, electrode insertion difficulty due to high CSF gusher was experienced in19 (9.23%) cases, full length of electrode insertion was not possible due to ossified basal turn 12 (5.83%), difficult to find out round window membrane due to rotated cochlea 02 (0.97%), prevented direct visualization of the round window due to high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%), difficult to approach round window due to very high facial nerve 02 (0.97%). and approach to round window membrane was compromised due to anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%). Most of these difficulties were effectively managed during surgery.\nConclusions: This study highlights the importance of preoperative radiological scanning in the assessment of patients undergoing cochlear implantation. It provides vital information on cochlear status and in ruling out non cochlear causes where cochlear implantation is not feasible. Detection of anatomical abnormalities with appropriate evaluation, specially imaging should be mandatory in every patient undergoing cochlear implantation.\nJ Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 167-175","PeriodicalId":320976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","volume":"69 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A cross-sectional prospective clinical study was done to evaluate the inner ear anomalies in candidates undergoing cochlear implantation. Materials and Methods: Study was carried out over a period of 07 years (Jan 2013 to Dec 2019) at Cochlear Implant Centre, Combined Military Hospital Dhaka. A total 206 deaf candidates, both pre and post lingual, were included in convenient sampling method. Result: The sample consisted of 206 candidates, of whom 117 (56.80%) were female and 89 (43.20%) were male. All candidates had severe to profound bilateral deafness. 182 (88.35%) of them were pre and 24 (11.65%) were in post lingual group. All patients diagnosed audiologically as profound deafness underwent HRCT scan of temporal bone with 3D reconstruction of cochlea and MRI of internal auditory canal & brain. Radiological examination revealed that 36 (17.47%) candidates had ear anomalies. Mondini deformity 14 (06.80%), cochlear ossification 11 (5.34%), large vestibular aqueduct 04 (1.94%), high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%) and anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%) were noted. During intervention, 42 (20.39%) candidates had anomalous intra operative findings. Among them CSF gusher 19 (9.23%), ossification of basal turn 12 (5.83%), isolated rotated Cochlea 02 (0.97%), high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%), anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%), and very high facial nerve 02 (0.97%) were observed. During surgery, electrode insertion difficulty due to high CSF gusher was experienced in19 (9.23%) cases, full length of electrode insertion was not possible due to ossified basal turn 12 (5.83%), difficult to find out round window membrane due to rotated cochlea 02 (0.97%), prevented direct visualization of the round window due to high jugular bulb 04 (1.94%), difficult to approach round window due to very high facial nerve 02 (0.97%). and approach to round window membrane was compromised due to anteriorly placed sigmoid sinus 03 (1.45%). Most of these difficulties were effectively managed during surgery. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of preoperative radiological scanning in the assessment of patients undergoing cochlear implantation. It provides vital information on cochlear status and in ruling out non cochlear causes where cochlear implantation is not feasible. Detection of anatomical abnormalities with appropriate evaluation, specially imaging should be mandatory in every patient undergoing cochlear implantation. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 167-175
人工耳蜗植入的影像学研究与手术透视
摘要:本研究为评估人工耳蜗植入患者的内耳异常,进行了一项横断面前瞻性临床研究。材料和方法:研究于2013年1月至2019年12月在达卡联合军事医院人工耳蜗中心进行,为期07年。采用方便抽样法,对206名聋人进行了语言前和语言后的测试。结果:样本共206人,其中女性117人(56.80%),男性89人(43.20%)。所有的候选人都有严重到深度的双侧耳聋。其中语前组182例(88.35%),语后组24例(11.65%)。所有听力诊断为深度耳聋的患者均行颞骨HRCT扫描、耳蜗三维重建、内耳道及脑MRI检查。影像学检查显示36例(17.47%)患者耳部异常。Mondini畸形14例(06.80%),耳蜗骨化11例(5.34%),大前庭导水管04例(1.94%),高颈静脉球04例(1.94%),乙状窦前置03例(1.45%)。干预期间,42例(20.39%)患者出现术中异常。其中脑脊液喷涌19例(9.23%)、基底转骨化12例(5.83%)、孤立旋转耳蜗02例(0.97%)、颈静脉高球04例(1.94%)、乙状窦前置03例(1.45%)、面神经高位02例(0.97%)。术中因脑脊液高喷涌导致电极插入困难19例(9.23%),基底转12骨化导致电极无法全长插入(5.83%),耳蜗旋转导致圆窗膜难以发现(0.97%),颈静脉球高导致圆窗无法直接可见(1.94%),面神经高度高导致圆窗难以接近(0.97%)。乙状结肠窦前位导致圆窗膜入路受损(1.45%)。这些困难大多在手术中得到了有效的处理。结论:本研究强调了术前放射学扫描在评估人工耳蜗植入术患者中的重要性。它提供了重要的信息,在耳蜗状态和排除非耳蜗原因,人工耳蜗植入是不可行的。对每位接受人工耳蜗植入术的患者,解剖异常的检测和适当的评估,特别是影像学检查都是必须的。达卡医学院,2021;30(2): 167-175
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信