EFFECTS OF SUBSTITUTION OF BASAL FEED WITH FERMENTED NON CONVENTIONAL FEED IN RATION ON PHYSICAL QUALITY OF BROILER MEAT

Sandra Dwi Pangestika, Elis Dihansih, A. Anggraeni
{"title":"EFFECTS OF SUBSTITUTION OF BASAL FEED WITH FERMENTED NON CONVENTIONAL FEED IN RATION ON PHYSICAL QUALITY OF BROILER MEAT","authors":"Sandra Dwi Pangestika, Elis Dihansih, A. Anggraeni","doi":"10.30997/JPNU.V4I2.1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demand for broiler meat for fulfilling people’s need for animal protein is increasing as it is nutritious and cheap in price. This study was aimed at assessing the effects of substitution of basal feed with fermented non conventional feed in ration on physical quality of broiler meat. The study was conducted from May to June 2017 at the Animal Laboratory of Djuanda University, Bogor. Proximate analysis on palm kernel cake, coconut cake, tofu waste product, and dried cassava was conducted at the laboratory of the Research Center of Biological Resources and Biotechnology, Bogor Agricultural University. Twenty-four of broiler chickens were used. A completely randomized design with 6 treatments and 4 replicates was used. Treatments consisted of 100% basal ration (R0, control), 90% basal ration + 10% non conventional feed (R1), 75% basal ration + 25% non conventional feed (R2), 60% basal ration + 40% non conventional feed (R3), 45% basal ration + 55% non conventional feed (R4), and 30% basal ration + 70% non conventional feed (R5). Results showed that water holding capacity, water content, and tenderness of meat were significantly different (P<0.05) but pH and cooking loss were not (P>0.05). Key words: broiler chicken, non conventional feed, meat physical quality","PeriodicalId":339013,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30997/JPNU.V4I2.1541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demand for broiler meat for fulfilling people’s need for animal protein is increasing as it is nutritious and cheap in price. This study was aimed at assessing the effects of substitution of basal feed with fermented non conventional feed in ration on physical quality of broiler meat. The study was conducted from May to June 2017 at the Animal Laboratory of Djuanda University, Bogor. Proximate analysis on palm kernel cake, coconut cake, tofu waste product, and dried cassava was conducted at the laboratory of the Research Center of Biological Resources and Biotechnology, Bogor Agricultural University. Twenty-four of broiler chickens were used. A completely randomized design with 6 treatments and 4 replicates was used. Treatments consisted of 100% basal ration (R0, control), 90% basal ration + 10% non conventional feed (R1), 75% basal ration + 25% non conventional feed (R2), 60% basal ration + 40% non conventional feed (R3), 45% basal ration + 55% non conventional feed (R4), and 30% basal ration + 70% non conventional feed (R5). Results showed that water holding capacity, water content, and tenderness of meat were significantly different (P<0.05) but pH and cooking loss were not (P>0.05). Key words: broiler chicken, non conventional feed, meat physical quality
发酵非常规饲料替代日粮基础饲料对肉鸡肉品质的影响
由于肉鸡营养丰富,价格便宜,满足人们对动物蛋白的需求,肉鸡的需求正在增加。本试验旨在评价在日粮中以发酵非常规饲料替代基础饲料对肉鸡肉品质的影响。该研究于2017年5月至6月在茂物大安达大学动物实验室进行。在茂物农业大学生物资源与生物技术研究中心实验室对棕榈仁饼、椰子饼、豆腐废料和干木薯进行了近似分析。选用24只肉鸡。试验采用完全随机设计,6个处理,4个重复。对照组为100%基础日粮(R0)、90%基础日粮+ 10%非常规饲料(R1)、75%基础日粮+ 25%非常规饲料(R2)、60%基础日粮+ 40%非常规饲料(R3)、45%基础日粮+ 55%非常规饲料(R4)和30%基础日粮+ 70%非常规饲料(R5)。结果表明,不同处理的肉的保水能力、含水量和嫩度均有显著差异(P0.05)。关键词:肉鸡,非常规饲料,肉质物理品质
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信