European standardization policy

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1995-09-01 DOI:10.1145/226191.226210
D. Wood
{"title":"European standardization policy","authors":"D. Wood","doi":"10.1145/226191.226210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"■ A workshop on Information and Communication Technology Standardization Policy was held by the European Commission in November 1994. The European Union has a policy requiring European and international standards in public procurements. There is growing realization in the Commission that many formal standards are not successful in the marketplace, and that de facto standards from consortia often provide a cheaper alternative for open systems. The workshop resulted in a series of recommendations that can be expected to lead to changes in European policy on standardization over the next year. There were many parallels between the workshop and the U.S. Federal Internetworking Requirements Panel (FIRP), which in 1994 recommended changes to U.S. Government Open System Interconnection Profile (GOSIP) policy. he workshop was motivated primarily by recommendations made to the European Council in June of 1994 on “Europe and the Global Information Society.” The recommendations are contained in the “Bangemann Report,” which was prepared by a group of prominent persons and chaired by Commissioner Martin Bangemann [Bangemann 1994]. The report sets out a vision for Europe in the Global Information Infrastructure, and in many ways is analogous to the Clinton/Gore February 1993 paper on technology for America’s economic growth [Clinton and Gore 1993] and the National Information Infrastructure (NII) Agenda for Action of September 1993 [IITF 1993]. The report, which does not favor more public money, urges the European Union to put its faith in market mechanisms, to deregulate, and to encourage a competitive market for information services. It also proposes an action plan involving ten key applications. The report makes some critical observations concerning standards: “Standards institutes have an honorable record in producing European standards, but the standardization process as it stands today raises a number of concerns about fitness for purpose, lack of interoperability, and priority setting that is not sufficiently market driven.” In line with its overall vision and on the basis of its assessment of the current organization and output, “the Bangemann Group recommends a review of the European standardization process in order to increase its speed and responsiveness to markets.”","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/226191.226210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

■ A workshop on Information and Communication Technology Standardization Policy was held by the European Commission in November 1994. The European Union has a policy requiring European and international standards in public procurements. There is growing realization in the Commission that many formal standards are not successful in the marketplace, and that de facto standards from consortia often provide a cheaper alternative for open systems. The workshop resulted in a series of recommendations that can be expected to lead to changes in European policy on standardization over the next year. There were many parallels between the workshop and the U.S. Federal Internetworking Requirements Panel (FIRP), which in 1994 recommended changes to U.S. Government Open System Interconnection Profile (GOSIP) policy. he workshop was motivated primarily by recommendations made to the European Council in June of 1994 on “Europe and the Global Information Society.” The recommendations are contained in the “Bangemann Report,” which was prepared by a group of prominent persons and chaired by Commissioner Martin Bangemann [Bangemann 1994]. The report sets out a vision for Europe in the Global Information Infrastructure, and in many ways is analogous to the Clinton/Gore February 1993 paper on technology for America’s economic growth [Clinton and Gore 1993] and the National Information Infrastructure (NII) Agenda for Action of September 1993 [IITF 1993]. The report, which does not favor more public money, urges the European Union to put its faith in market mechanisms, to deregulate, and to encourage a competitive market for information services. It also proposes an action plan involving ten key applications. The report makes some critical observations concerning standards: “Standards institutes have an honorable record in producing European standards, but the standardization process as it stands today raises a number of concerns about fitness for purpose, lack of interoperability, and priority setting that is not sufficiently market driven.” In line with its overall vision and on the basis of its assessment of the current organization and output, “the Bangemann Group recommends a review of the European standardization process in order to increase its speed and responsiveness to markets.”
欧洲标准化政策
■欧洲联盟委员会于1994年11月举办了一次关于信息和通信技术标准化政策的讲习班。欧洲联盟有一项政策,要求在公共采购方面达到欧洲和国际标准。委员会越来越多地认识到,许多正式的标准在市场上并不成功,而来自联盟的事实上的标准通常为开放系统提供更便宜的替代方案。该研讨会提出了一系列建议,预计将导致明年欧洲标准化政策的变化。研讨会和美国联邦互联网需求小组(FIRP)之间有许多相似之处,FIRP在1994年建议修改美国政府开放系统互连概要(GOSIP)政策。该研讨会的主要动机是1994年6月向欧洲理事会提出的关于“欧洲和全球信息社会”的建议。这些建议载于“Bangemann报告”,该报告由一组知名人士编写,由Martin Bangemann专员担任主席[Bangemann 1994]。报告提出了欧洲在全球信息基础设施中的远景,在许多方面类似于1993年2月克林顿/戈尔关于技术促进美国经济增长的论文[克林顿和戈尔1993年]和1993年9月国家信息基础设施(NII)行动议程[IITF 1993]。这份报告不赞成增加公共资金,它敦促欧盟相信市场机制,放松管制,鼓励信息服务市场的竞争。它还提出了一项涉及十个关键应用的行动计划。该报告提出了一些关于标准的批评意见:“标准协会在制定欧洲标准方面有着良好的记录,但是今天的标准化过程引起了许多关于目的适用性的担忧,缺乏互操作性,以及优先级设置没有充分的市场驱动。”根据其总体愿景和对当前组织和产出的评估,“班格曼集团建议对欧洲标准化进程进行审查,以提高其速度和对市场的响应能力。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信