Rural Households’ Multidimensional Poverty and Its Determinants in Konso Woreda, SNNP Region, Ethiopia

Kayranto Kasho
{"title":"Rural Households’ Multidimensional Poverty and Its Determinants in Konso Woreda, SNNP Region, Ethiopia","authors":"Kayranto Kasho","doi":"10.59122/1344a74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eradicating poverty in all its forms is one of global society's sustainable development goals. This requires creative and rigorous efforts to measure and reduce multidimensional poverty in a way that ensures no one is left behind. Despite a couple of efforts made to measure multidimensional aspects of welfare at the national level, limited studies have been done in rural parts of the country, where most poverty researches focused in unidimensional poverty. Hence, this study quantified the extent and examined the determinants of rural household multidimensional poverty status using the Alkire-Foster method and the ordered logistic regression model, respectively. Crosssectional data set was collected from 397 randomly selected households using structured questionnaire. Living standards indicators contribute the most to multidimensional poverty, while empowerment contributes the least. The study revealed that multidimensional poverty headcount, intensity, and the index were found to be 80.35 percent, 55.97 percent, and 44.8 percent, respectively. Among the sampled households, 2.2 percent of households were non-poor, 17.8 percent were vulnerable, 52.6 percent were moderately poor, and 27.4 percent were severely poor. According to the ordered logit model, the probability of a household being in multidimensional poverty was determined negatively by sex(male), expenditure, family size, land size, and employment level, while age and distance to the nearest health center are positively influencing it. Hence, promoting family planning, diversifying income sources and viable labor-intensive rural employment opportunities, provision of improved energy sources, electricity, clean water, and a road network would reduce a multifaceted rural poverty. \nKeywords: Deprivation Score; Konso; Multidimensional Poverty Index; Ordered Logit Model             ","PeriodicalId":247662,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59122/1344a74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eradicating poverty in all its forms is one of global society's sustainable development goals. This requires creative and rigorous efforts to measure and reduce multidimensional poverty in a way that ensures no one is left behind. Despite a couple of efforts made to measure multidimensional aspects of welfare at the national level, limited studies have been done in rural parts of the country, where most poverty researches focused in unidimensional poverty. Hence, this study quantified the extent and examined the determinants of rural household multidimensional poverty status using the Alkire-Foster method and the ordered logistic regression model, respectively. Crosssectional data set was collected from 397 randomly selected households using structured questionnaire. Living standards indicators contribute the most to multidimensional poverty, while empowerment contributes the least. The study revealed that multidimensional poverty headcount, intensity, and the index were found to be 80.35 percent, 55.97 percent, and 44.8 percent, respectively. Among the sampled households, 2.2 percent of households were non-poor, 17.8 percent were vulnerable, 52.6 percent were moderately poor, and 27.4 percent were severely poor. According to the ordered logit model, the probability of a household being in multidimensional poverty was determined negatively by sex(male), expenditure, family size, land size, and employment level, while age and distance to the nearest health center are positively influencing it. Hence, promoting family planning, diversifying income sources and viable labor-intensive rural employment opportunities, provision of improved energy sources, electricity, clean water, and a road network would reduce a multifaceted rural poverty. Keywords: Deprivation Score; Konso; Multidimensional Poverty Index; Ordered Logit Model             
埃塞俄比亚SNNP地区Konso Woreda农村家庭多维贫困及其决定因素
消除一切形式的贫困是全球社会的可持续发展目标之一。这需要创造性和严格的努力,以确保不让任何一个人掉队的方式衡量和减少多维贫困。尽管在国家一级为衡量福利的多层面方面作出了一些努力,但在该国农村地区进行的研究有限,那里的大多数贫穷研究集中在单一层面的贫穷。因此,本研究分别采用Alkire-Foster方法和有序逻辑回归模型对农户多维贫困状况的程度进行量化,并考察其影响因素。采用结构化问卷法对随机抽取的397户家庭进行横断面数据采集。生活水平指标对多维贫困的影响最大,而赋权对多维贫困的影响最小。该研究显示,多维贫困人数、贫困强度和贫困指数分别为80.35%、55.97%和44.8%。在抽样家庭中,非贫困家庭占2.2%,弱势家庭占17.8%,中等贫困家庭占52.6%,严重贫困家庭占27.4%。根据有序logit模型,家庭处于多维贫困的概率受性别(男性)、支出、家庭规模、土地面积和就业水平的负向影响,而年龄和距离最近的保健中心的距离对其有正向影响。因此,促进计划生育、使收入来源和可行的劳动密集型农村就业机会多样化、提供改良的能源、电力、清洁水和公路网将减少多方面的农村贫困。关键词:剥夺评分;Konso;多维贫困指数;有序Logit模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信