Protesting Retrospectively: Oral Memories and Social Practices of Migrants from the Areas of Artificial Water Reservoirs in Soviet Ukraine

Iryna Koval-Fuchylo
{"title":"Protesting Retrospectively: Oral Memories and Social Practices of Migrants from the Areas of Artificial Water Reservoirs in Soviet Ukraine","authors":"Iryna Koval-Fuchylo","doi":"10.17161/folklorica.v25i1.18332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between the 1920s and the 1980s, Soviet Ukraine saw six large hydroelectric power plants constructed on the Dnipro River and one on the Dnister River. (1) The projects necessitated the creation of artificial water reservoirs, resulting in the destruction of a large number of old villages. The residents of these places were forcibly resettled. In the 1960s and 1970s, a time period that constitutes the main focus of this paper, the only form of protest to forcible resettlement was defiance: according to the state plan, while people were required to demolish their houses and build new ones in a specially designated place, many did not. Any other form of protest was dangerous in a totalitarian state. The weakening and further collapse of the Soviet regime altered the political climate, and Ukraine has since witnessed numerous expressions of discontent in the forms of strikes, rallies, collective statements, etc. These experiences led to a rethinking of the Soviet past and a search for protest where it previously had not existed. The present article focuses on narratives and social events that serve as creative responses to the forcible resettlement. It shows that these forms of protest have emerged as a result of changing perceptions of the feasibility of hydropower and an understanding of the losses caused by the flooding of forests, pastures, and farmlands. The present case study illustrates that protests, typically associated with immediate response to political events, can sometimes form retrospectively, and can be directly shaped by the processes of the formation and traditionalization of memory.","PeriodicalId":359705,"journal":{"name":"FOLKLORICA - Journal of the Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Folklore Association","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FOLKLORICA - Journal of the Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Folklore Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/folklorica.v25i1.18332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between the 1920s and the 1980s, Soviet Ukraine saw six large hydroelectric power plants constructed on the Dnipro River and one on the Dnister River. (1) The projects necessitated the creation of artificial water reservoirs, resulting in the destruction of a large number of old villages. The residents of these places were forcibly resettled. In the 1960s and 1970s, a time period that constitutes the main focus of this paper, the only form of protest to forcible resettlement was defiance: according to the state plan, while people were required to demolish their houses and build new ones in a specially designated place, many did not. Any other form of protest was dangerous in a totalitarian state. The weakening and further collapse of the Soviet regime altered the political climate, and Ukraine has since witnessed numerous expressions of discontent in the forms of strikes, rallies, collective statements, etc. These experiences led to a rethinking of the Soviet past and a search for protest where it previously had not existed. The present article focuses on narratives and social events that serve as creative responses to the forcible resettlement. It shows that these forms of protest have emerged as a result of changing perceptions of the feasibility of hydropower and an understanding of the losses caused by the flooding of forests, pastures, and farmlands. The present case study illustrates that protests, typically associated with immediate response to political events, can sometimes form retrospectively, and can be directly shaped by the processes of the formation and traditionalization of memory.
回顾抗议:来自苏联乌克兰人工水库地区移民的口头记忆和社会实践
在20世纪20年代到80年代之间,苏联乌克兰在第聂伯罗河上建造了六座大型水力发电厂,在第聂斯特河上建造了一座水电站。这些工程需要修建人工水库,导致大量老村庄遭到破坏。这些地方的居民被强行重新安置。在20世纪60年代和70年代,这段时间构成了本文的主要焦点,对强制安置的唯一抗议形式是反抗:根据国家计划,虽然人们被要求拆除他们的房屋并在一个特别指定的地方建造新的房屋,但许多人没有这样做。在一个极权主义国家,任何其他形式的抗议都是危险的。苏联政权的削弱和进一步崩溃改变了政治气候,乌克兰从此见证了无数以罢工、集会、集体声明等形式表达不满的行为。这些经历导致了对苏联历史的重新思考,并在以前不存在的地方寻求抗议。本文的重点是叙事和社会事件,作为创造性的反应,对强制重新安置。研究表明,这些抗议形式的出现是由于人们对水电可行性的看法发生了变化,以及对森林、牧场和农田被洪水淹没所造成的损失的理解。本案例研究表明,抗议活动通常与对政治事件的即时反应有关,有时可以追溯形成,并可以直接受到记忆形成和传统化过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信