Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database

Mary A. Burke, Riley Sullivan, K. Carman, H. Wen, J. Wharam, Hao Yu
{"title":"Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database","authors":"Mary A. Burke, Riley Sullivan, K. Carman, H. Wen, J. Wharam, Hao Yu","doi":"10.29412/RES.WP.2021.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses the all-payer claims database (APCD) for Rhode Island to study three questions about the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD): (1) Does MAT reduce the risk of opioid overdose; (2) are there systematic differences in the uptake of MAT by observable patient-level characteristics; and (3) how successful were federal policy changes implemented in 2016 that sought to promote increased use of buprenorphine, one of three medication options within MAT? Regarding the first question, we find that MAT as practiced in Rhode Island is associated with a reduced risk of repeated opioid overdose among patients who had an initial nonfatal opioid overdose, consistent with the strong endorsement of MAT by public health officials. Concerning the second, we find that factors such as age, gender, health insurance payer, and the poverty rate in one’s residential Zip code are associated with significant differences in the chance of receiving methadone and/or buprenorphine, suggesting that certain groups may face unwarranted disparities in access to MAT. About the third question, we find that a 2016 federal rule change enabled at least some experienced Rhode Island buprenorphine prescribers to reach more patients, and a separate 2016 policy aimed at recruiting new buprenorphine prescribers was also found to be effective. However, the data also suggest that many more patients in the state could be treated with buprenorphine if prescribers took full advantage of their prescribing limits.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29412/RES.WP.2021.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper uses the all-payer claims database (APCD) for Rhode Island to study three questions about the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD): (1) Does MAT reduce the risk of opioid overdose; (2) are there systematic differences in the uptake of MAT by observable patient-level characteristics; and (3) how successful were federal policy changes implemented in 2016 that sought to promote increased use of buprenorphine, one of three medication options within MAT? Regarding the first question, we find that MAT as practiced in Rhode Island is associated with a reduced risk of repeated opioid overdose among patients who had an initial nonfatal opioid overdose, consistent with the strong endorsement of MAT by public health officials. Concerning the second, we find that factors such as age, gender, health insurance payer, and the poverty rate in one’s residential Zip code are associated with significant differences in the chance of receiving methadone and/or buprenorphine, suggesting that certain groups may face unwarranted disparities in access to MAT. About the third question, we find that a 2016 federal rule change enabled at least some experienced Rhode Island buprenorphine prescribers to reach more patients, and a separate 2016 policy aimed at recruiting new buprenorphine prescribers was also found to be effective. However, the data also suggest that many more patients in the state could be treated with buprenorphine if prescribers took full advantage of their prescribing limits.
谁接受药物辅助治疗阿片类药物使用障碍,它是否降低过量风险?证据来自罗德岛全付款人索赔数据库
本文利用罗德岛州的全付款人索赔数据库(APCD)研究了阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)使用药物辅助治疗(MAT)的三个问题:(1)MAT是否降低了阿片类药物过量的风险;(2)可观察到的患者水平特征是否存在MAT摄取的系统性差异;(3) 2016年实施的旨在促进丁丙诺啡(MAT中的三种药物选择之一)增加使用的联邦政策变化有多成功?关于第一个问题,我们发现罗德岛州实施的MAT与最初非致命性阿片类药物过量患者重复阿片类药物过量的风险降低有关,这与公共卫生官员对MAT的强烈支持一致。关于第二个问题,我们发现年龄、性别、医疗保险支付款人和居住邮政编码的贫困率等因素与接受美沙酮和/或丁丙诺啡的机会的显着差异相关,这表明某些群体在获得MAT方面可能面临不必要的差异。关于第三个问题,我们发现2016年联邦规则的变化使至少一些经验丰富的罗德岛州丁丙诺啡处方者能够接触到更多的患者。2016年另一项旨在招募新的丁丙诺啡处方者的政策也被发现是有效的。然而,数据也表明,如果开处方者充分利用他们的处方限制,该州更多的患者可以用丁丙诺啡治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信